| Literature DB >> 31873816 |
Alain Manrique1,2, David Dudoignon3, Stéphanie Brun4,5, Catherine N'Ganoa3, Emmanuelle Cassol4,5, Damien Legallois6, Yoan Lavie-Badie7, Denis Agostini3, Olivier Lairez4,5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to compare different methods for semi-quantitative analysis of cardiac retention of bone tracers in patients with cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR).Entities:
Keywords: Bone scintigraphy; CZT SPECT; Cardiac amyloidosis; Planar imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 31873816 PMCID: PMC6928186 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-019-0584-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res ISSN: 2191-219X Impact factor: 3.138
Patients characteristics
| Age | 81 ± 6 |
| Gender, male, | 57 (85) |
| NYHA class, | |
| 0–I | 17 (25) |
| II | 18 (27) |
| III | 20 (30) |
| IV | 12 (18) |
| Echocardiography | |
| Septal thickness, mm | 17 ± 4 |
| LVEF, % | 47 ± 14 |
| Perugini classification, | |
| Grade 1 | 3 (5) |
| Grade 2 | 28 (42) |
| Grade 3 | 36 (53) |
| Heart-to-background ratio | |
| Whole-body | 2.05 ± 0.64 |
| SPECT anterior projection | 1.97 ± 0.61 |
| SPECT LAO projection | 2.06 ± 0.64 |
| SPECT 3D | 4.06 ± 1.77 |
| CZT SPECT | |
| LV EDV, ml | 148 ± 55 |
| LV ESV, ml | 93 ± 50 |
| LV EF, % | 41 ± 15 |
| Right ventricular uptake, | 20 (30) |
Heart-to-background uptake ratio according to the Perugini grade
| Heart-to-background ratio | Perugini 1 | Perugini 2 | Perugini 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole-body | 1.45 ± 0.04* | 1.65 ± 0.22†/‡ | 2.42 ± 0.67‡ |
| SPECT anterior projection | 1.51 ± 0.36†† | 1.63 ± 0.24†/‡ | 2.27 ± 0.67‡ |
| SPECT LAO projection | 1.24 ± 0.06* | 1.77 ± 0.29†/‡ | 2.35 ± 0.70‡ |
| SPECT 3D | 1.96 ± 0.88* | 3.07 ± 0.63† | 5.01 ± 1.85 |
*p < 0.01. † p < 0.0001 and ††p < 0.05 vs. Perugini grade 3. ‡p < 0.0001 vs. SPECT 3D
Regression analysis and Pearson’s correlation between each individual method for heart-to-background (H:B) uptake ratio
| Regression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WB-H:B | Ant-H:B | 0.89 | < 0.0001 | |
| WB-H:B | LAO-H:B | 0.82 | < 0.0001 | |
| WB-H:B | 3D-H:B | 0.82 | < 0.0001 | |
| Ant-H:B | LAO-H:B | 0.78 | < 0.0001 | |
| Ant-H:B | 3D-H:B | 0.80 | < 0.0001 | |
| LAO-H:B | 3D-H:B | 0.74 | < 0.0001 |
Fig. 1Bland-Altman analysis showing (1) a high agreement between all planar methods for the measurement of the heart-to-background (H:B) uptake ratio (a-c) and (2) an underestimation of the high H:B uptake ratio using planar methods as shown by the increased difference between 3D-H:B and planar H:B ratios for high H:B ratio values (d–f). WB, whole-body H:B; Ant, anterior planogram H:B; LAO, left anterior oblique planogram H:B
Fig. 2Correlation of the heart-to-background (H:B) uptake ratio to the septal wall thickness. WB, whole-body H:B; Ant, anterior planogram H:B; LAO, left anterior oblique planogram H:B
Heart-to-background uptake ratio according to the right ventricular (RV) uptake
| Heart-to-background ratio | No RV uptake | Positive RV uptake | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole-body | 1.78 ± 0.41 | 2.17 ± 0.69 | < 0.01 |
| SPECT anterior projection | 1.77 ± 0.31 | 2.03 ± 0.65 | ns |
| SPECT LAO projection | 1.95 ± 0.56 | 2.08 ± 0.68 | < 0.05 |
| SPECT 3D | 3.46 ± 1.18 | 4.21 ± 1.82 | < 0.05 |