Xiao-Yan Sheng1, Yan Liang1, Xue-Yuan Yang2, Li-E Li3, Xia Ye3, Xia Zhao1, Yi-Min Cui4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, No. 6, Da Hong Luo Chang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China. 3. R&D, Yichang Humanwell Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Hubei, China. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, No. 6, Da Hong Luo Chang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. cui.pharm@pkufh.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of remimazolam besylate following single ascending dose (SAD) and continuous infusion in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: This was a randomized phase I study conducted in two parts. Part I was a double-blind, placebo- and midazolam-controlled, SAD study among healthy Chinese participants with a remimazolam dose of 0.025-0.4 mg/kg. Part II was an open-label, midazolam-controlled, continuous infusion study. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring and Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) score assessment were used to assess the PD properties. RESULTS: The half-life range of remimazolam was from 34.1 ± 8.1 to 59.8 ± 20.5 min in the SAD study. The sedation function was initially observed at the dose of 0.05 mg/kg remimazolam. Doses of ≥ 0.075 mg/kg exerted a peak sedation effect within 1-2 min after injection, resulting in a deeper and more rapid sedation. In the 2 h continuous infusion, remimazolam showed a deeper sedation and more rapid recovery than midazolam. For general anesthesia, an induction dosage of 0.2 mg/kg/min and a maintenance dosage of 1 mg/kg/h can achieve a satisfactory efficacy effect. CONCLUSIONS:Remimazolam was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese participants. Based on the phase I clinical study, we suggest that remimazolam besylate demonstrates greater sedation and quicker recovery from sedation than midazolam.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of remimazolam besylate following single ascending dose (SAD) and continuous infusion in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: This was a randomized phase I study conducted in two parts. Part I was a double-blind, placebo- and midazolam-controlled, SAD study among healthy Chinese participants with a remimazolam dose of 0.025-0.4 mg/kg. Part II was an open-label, midazolam-controlled, continuous infusion study. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring and Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) score assessment were used to assess the PD properties. RESULTS: The half-life range of remimazolam was from 34.1 ± 8.1 to 59.8 ± 20.5 min in the SAD study. The sedation function was initially observed at the dose of 0.05 mg/kg remimazolam. Doses of ≥ 0.075 mg/kg exerted a peak sedation effect within 1-2 min after injection, resulting in a deeper and more rapid sedation. In the 2 h continuous infusion, remimazolam showed a deeper sedation and more rapid recovery than midazolam. For general anesthesia, an induction dosage of 0.2 mg/kg/min and a maintenance dosage of 1 mg/kg/h can achieve a satisfactory efficacy effect. CONCLUSIONS:Remimazolam was safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese participants. Based on the phase I clinical study, we suggest that remimazolam besylate demonstrates greater sedation and quicker recovery from sedation than midazolam.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chinese subjects; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Remimazolam besylate
Authors: Erik Olofsen; René Mooren; Eveline van Dorp; Leon Aarts; Terry Smith; Jan den Hartigh; Albert Dahan; Elise Sarton Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: D A Chernik; D Gillings; H Laine; J Hendler; J M Silver; A B Davidson; E M Schwam; J L Siegel Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 1990-08 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Douglas K Rex; Raj Bhandari; Taddese Desta; Michael P DeMicco; Cynthia Schaeffer; Kyle Etzkorn; Charles F Barish; Ronald Pruitt; Brooks D Cash; Daniel Quirk; Felix Tiongco; Shelby Sullivan; David Bernstein Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Brian J Ulmer; Jonathan J Hansen; Christine A Overley; Michelle R Symms; Vidyasree Chadalawada; Suthat Liangpunsakul; Eloise Strahl; April M Mendel; Douglas K Rex Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Remco Vellinga; Beatrijs I Valk; Anthony R Absalom; Michel M R F Struys; Clemens R M Barends Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 4.964