| Literature DB >> 31871802 |
Maho Miyagi1, Keiko Mekaru1, Sugiko Oishi1, Chiaki Urasoe1, Kozue Akamine1, Yoichi Aoki1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Re-adhesion rates following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis have remained high. Accordingly, we present a case involving temporary placement of an intrauterine silicone plate to prevent re-adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in a 36-year-old woman with Asherman syndrome.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31871802 PMCID: PMC6906858 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5420837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 2090-6692
Figure 1Hysteroscopic examination.
Figure 2Transabdominal ultrasound was used to measure the balloon size.
Figure 3The silicone plate (200 × 150 mm silicone sheet with a thickness of 0.5 mm; Koken Co., Ltd. Bunkyo ward, Tokyo, Japan) was molded into an inverted triangle, comparable to the shape of the uterine cavity.
Figure 4Hysteroscopic (a) and transabdominal ultrasound (b) findings for the intrauterine placement of the silicone plate.
Figure 5Hysteroscopic findings following silicone plate removal.
Studies investigating the role of an intrauterine devicefoley catheter, and uterine balloon in preventing intrauterine adhesion formation after hysteroscopic surgery.
| Study design | Devices | Recurrence rate |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gan et al. (2017) [ | Prospective randomized | Foley catheter + freeze-dried amnion graft | 28% (11/40) | 0.24 |
| Foley catheter only | 40%(16/40) | |||
| Wang et al. (2016) [ | Prospective randomized | Amniotic scaffold balloon | 21% (6/29) | 0.25 |
| Foley catheter only | 36% (10/28) | |||
| Xiao et al. (2015) [ | Prospective randomized | Auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel + foley catheter | 13% (7/55) | 0.0006 |
| Foley catheter only | 38% (21/56) | |||
| Lin et al. (2015) [ | Prospective randomized | Heart-shaped balloon | 30% (25/82) | NS |
| Intrauterine device | 35% (28/80) |