| Literature DB >> 31871658 |
Ming Wang1,2, Chuanhua Wang1,2, Raozhen Jia3.
Abstract
Excessive nitrogen (N) deposition can impact lichen diversity in forest ecosystems, and this is a particular situation in China. Here, we examined the N uptake, assimilation, and the impact of excessive N deposition on the symbiotic balance of dominant epiphytic lichens in the subtropical forests in the Mts. Shennongjia of central China. The results show that lichen species took up, assimilated and utilized more ammonium than nitrate in a species-specific way, following the increase of N availability. The photobiont of the lichens decreased with the increase of N concentration following an initial increase, while the mycobiont response to the N addition was not apparent. Considerable variation in response to excessive N deposition exists among the lichen species. Usnea longissima could regulate its N uptake, resulting in a stable photobiont-mycobiont ratio among N treatments. In contrast, the photobiont-mycobiont ratio of other four lichens increased initially but decreased when N concentration exceeded a certain level, and N stress may have broken the balance between photobiont and mycobiont of these lichens. Our results suggest that most epiphytic lichens in subtropical forest of central China could uptake and assimilate more ammonium than nitrate and that the balance between photobiont and mycobiont of many epiphytic lichens might change with the increasing N deposition load, which could impact the lichen diversity of this forest ecosystem.Entities:
Keywords: ammonium; chlorophyll; ergosterol; lichen; nitrate
Year: 2019 PMID: 31871658 PMCID: PMC6912883 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5803
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Nitrogen contents in the lichens, and nitrogen taken by the lichens treated with different levels of N addition
| Lichen species | Total nitrogen (%) | 15N percent (%) | Uptake of N‐NH4 + (mg g−1 min−1) | Uptake of N‐NO3 − (mg g−1 min−1) | N‐NH4 +/N‐NO3 − |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.3241 ± 0.0185c | 0.3602 ± 0.0001a | 0.3611 ± 0.0426c | 0.0050 ± 0.0006a | 71.62 |
|
| 0.9980 ± 0.0449b | 0.3615 ± 0.0001b | 0.3074 ± 0.0533bc | 0.0065 ± 0.0014ab | 46.94 |
|
| 0.9001 ± 0.1098ab | 0.3621 ± 0.0005b | 0.1512 ± 0.0121a | 0.0057 ± 0.0020ab | 26.68 |
|
| 0.8478 ± 0.0729ab | 0.3610 ± 0.0002ab | 0.1880 ± 0.0497ab | 0.0200 ± 0.0072c | 9.38 |
|
| 0.7902 ± 0.1590a | 0.3611 ± 0.0013ab | 0.5269 ± 0.2084d | 0.0119 ± 0.0071b | 44.43 |
Data in columns are the mean ± SD (n = 4). Different letters in the columns denote significant differences between species.
Figure 1Differentiation of nitrogen taken by the epiphytic lichens under nitrogen stress. White bars 15NH4 + uptake; gray bars 15NO3 − uptake; (1) Usnea longissima; (2) Usnea luridorufa; (3) Ramalina calicaris var. japonica; (4) Usnea dasopoga; (5) Usnea betulina. Lower and uppercase letters on the bars indicated significant differences between NH4 + or NO3 − addition treatments, respectively
The influence of nitrogen addition to the ratio of chlorophyll and ergosterol in the lichens
| N addition (mM/L) | Lichen species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0.00 | 6.15 ± 0.58a | 1.84 ± 0.20a | 1.47 ± 0.01a | 1.62 ± 0.03a | 1.55 ± 0.01a |
| 0.05 | 4.33 ± 0.81a | 1.84 ± 0.08a | 1.97 ± 0.21a | 1.49 ± 0.15a | 2.11 ± 0.14ab |
| 0.10 | 5.92 ± 0.45a | 2.69 ± 0.17b | 1.72 ± 0.06a | 2.08 ± 0.25b | 2.97 ± 0.22c |
| 0.20 | 6.45 ± 0.28a | 3.14 ± 0.26b | 2.94 ± 0.26b | Not available | 2.92 ± 0.25c |
| 0.40 | 6.20 ± 1.34a | 2.57 ± 0.30b | 1.75 ± 0.12a | 2.37 ± 0.12b | 2.39 ± 0.32bc |
Data in columns are the mean ± SD (n = 4). The lowercase letters in the columns denote significant differences between species.
Figure 2Response of the photobiont and mycobiont of five epiphytic lichen species to nitrogen stress. White bars 15NH4 + uptake; gray bars 15NO3 − uptake; (1) Usnea longissima; (2) Usnea luridorufa; (3) Ramalina calicaris var. japonica; (4) Usnea dasopoga; (5) Usnea betulina. Lower and uppercase letters on the bars of the lichens indicated significant differences between NH4 + or NO3 − addition treatments, respectively