| Literature DB >> 31871643 |
Tuija Maliniemi1,2, Konsta Happonen3, Risto Virtanen2,4,5.
Abstract
Experimental evidence shows that site fertility is a key modulator underlying plant community changes under climate change. Communities on fertile sites, with species having fast dynamics, have been found to react more strongly to climate change than communities on infertile sites with slow dynamics. However, it is still unclear whether this generally applies to high-latitude plant communities in natural environments at broad spatial scales. We tested a hypothesis that vegetation of fertile sites experiences greater changes over several decades and thus would be more responsive under contemporary climate change compared to infertile sites that are expected to show more resistance. We resurveyed understorey communities (vascular plants, bryophytes, and lichens) of four infertile and four fertile forest sites along a latitudinal bioclimatic gradient. Sites had remained outside direct human disturbance. We analyzed the magnitude of temporal community turnover, changes in the abundances of plant morphological groups and strategy classes, and changes in species diversity. In agreement with our hypothesis, temporal turnover of communities was consistently greater on fertile sites compared to infertile sites. However, our results suggest that the larger turnover of fertile communities is not primarily related to the direct effects of climatic warming. Furthermore, community changes in both fertile and infertile sites showed remarkable variation in terms of shares of plant functional groups and strategy classes and measures of species diversity. This further emphasizes the essential role of baseline environmental conditions and nonclimatic drivers underlying vegetation changes. Our results show that site fertility is a key determinant of the overall rate of high-latitude vegetation changes but the composition of plant communities in different ecological contexts is variously impacted by nonclimatic drivers over time.Entities:
Keywords: community stability; dynamic macroecology; long‐term research; plant community; plant strategies; site fertility; vegetation resurvey
Year: 2019 PMID: 31871643 PMCID: PMC6912880 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Information on resurveyed forest vegetation datasets
| Sub region | Latitude/Longitude | Forest type | Soil type | Plot | Plot size (m) | Mean pH (range) | Years from original sampling | Data (published) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| shrub lr. | field lr. | |||||||
| MB | 64°N, 28°E | Herb‐rich | Mold | 8 | 5 × 5 | 5 × 5 | 4.9 (4.0–5.4) | 43–45 (1968–1970) | Kaakinen ( |
| 64°N, 28°E | Heath | Podzol | 9 | 10 × 10 | 1 × 1 | 3.9 (3.4–4.4) | 33–34 (1980–1981) | Leinonen ( | |
| NBs | 66°N, 30°E | Herb‐rich | Mold | 10 | 5 × 5 | 5 × 5 | 5.5 (4.0–6.0) | 42–43 (1971–1972) | Kaakinen ( |
| 66°N, 29°E | Heath | Podzol | 10 | 30 × 30 | 1 × 1 | 3.7 (3.5–3.8) | 34–35 (1979–1980) | Mikkonen‐Keränen ( | |
| NBm | 68°N, 24°E | Herb‐rich | Mold | 10 | 5 × 5 | 5 × 5 | 4.8 (4.3–5.2) | 39 (1975) | Kaakinen (unpubl.) |
| 68°N, 27°E | Heath | Podzol | 10 | 25 × 25 | 1 × 1 | 3.7 (3.4–4.1) | 34 (1980) | Lyytikäinen ( | |
| NBn | 69°N, 21°E | Herb‐rich | Mold | 10 | 10 × 10 | 10 × 10 | 5.4 (4.8–6.0) | 54–57 (1957–1960) | Hämet‐Ahti ( |
| 69°N, 21°E | Heath | Podzol | 11 | 10 × 10 | 10 × 10 | 4.2 (3.8–4.6) | 54–57 (1957–1960) | Hämet‐Ahti ( | |
Subregion (MB = middle boreal, NBs = northern boreal/southern part, NBm = northern boreal/middle part, NBn = northern boreal/northern part), forest type (herb‐rich = fertile, heath = infertile), soil type (specified in original survey and resurvey), number of resurveyed vegetation plots, plot sizes used in cover estimations for shrub layer species (shrub lr.) and for field and ground layer species (field lr.), average soil pH (based on our own analyses of soil samples collected during resurvey), years from the original sampling and the original data.
Partly paludified, peat‐like soil in the resurvey.
Averaged from five 1 × 1 m vegetation grids.
Averaged from two to four 1 × 1 m grids.
Averaged from four 1 × 1 m grids.
Figure 1Simulated Morisita–Horn turnover from a Bayesian regression model for fertile and infertile sites with 95% credible intervals. The observed means of each subregion during the original survey and resurvey are indicated as gray‐scale lines. Turnover is Morisita–Horn dissimilarity index (1‐Morisita–Horn index) that was calculated for each pair of original and resurveyed vegetation plot
Figure 2Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination grouped by original and resurveyed communities on fertile and infertile sites in subregions middle boreal zone (MB), northern boreal zone/southern part (NBs), northern boreal zone/middle part (NBm), and northern boreal zone/northern part (NBn). Labels within the confidence ellipses show the locations of group centroids
Figure 3Observed mean change in the absolute % ‐cover of morphological plant groups in (a) fertile and (b) infertile sites and (c) plants assigned into plant strategy classes (C, competitors; CR, competitive ruderals; R, ruderals; SR, stress‐tolerant ruderals; S, stress‐tolerators; CS, competitive stress‐tolerators; CSR, generalists) in fertile and (d) infertile sites in each subregion. Error bars represent bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. Plant group and strategy class covers (%) in original survey and resurvey are shown in Appendix S3
Figure 4Posterior simulations of main strategy class (C, S, and R) proportions for fertile and infertile sites with 95% credible intervals. The observed means of each subregion during the original survey and resurvey are indicated as gray‐scale lines
Figure 5Simulated (a) vascular plant species diversity and (b) bryophyte species diversity for fertile and infertile sites with 95% credible intervals. Diversity measures are effective numbers of Simpson diversity. The observed means of each subregion during the original survey and resurvey are indicated as gray‐scale lines (specific values in Appendix S10c)
Beta diversity, as a community turnover rate with standard error inside brackets, within studied communities in the original survey (β old) and resurvey (β new) on fertile and infertile sites in each subregion
| Subregion | Fertile sites | Infertile sites | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Δ |
|
| Δ | |
| MB | 0.198 (0.012) | 0.283 (0.021) | 0.085 | 0.091 (0.006) | 0.130 (0.013) | 0.039 |
| NBs | 0.093 (0.007) | 0.078 (0.005) | −0.015 | 0.073 (0.007) | 0.064 (0.005) | −0.009 |
| NBm | 0.078 (0.006) | 0.131 (0.008) | 0.053 | 0.083 (0.006) | 0.040 (0.006) | −0.043 |
| NBn | 0.147 (0.009) | 0.156 (0.008) | 0.009 | 0.029 (0.002) | 0.054 (0.005) | 0.025 |
Rates range from zero (no turnover between sample plots of a site) to one (complete turnover between samples). Difference between old and new turnover value (Δβ) indicates whether community compositions show signs toward heterogenization or homogenization.