| Literature DB >> 31871639 |
Samantha Bird1, Erin Prewer2, Susan Kutz3,4, Lisa-Marie Leclerc5, Sibelle T Vilaça2,6, Christopher J Kyle1,2.
Abstract
The Canadian Arctic is an extreme environment with low floral and faunal diversity characterized by major seasonal shifts in temperature, moisture, and daylight. Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) are one of few large herbivores able to survive this harsh environment. Microbiome research of the gastrointestinal tract may hold clues as to how muskoxen exist in the Arctic, but also how this species may respond to rapid environmental changes. In this study, we investigated the effects of season (spring/summer/winter), year (2007-2016), and host genetic structure on population-level microbiome variation in muskoxen from the Canadian Arctic. We utilized 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize the fecal microbial communities of 78 male muskoxen encompassing two population genetic clusters. These clusters are defined by Arctic Mainland and Island populations, including the following: (a) two mainland sampling locations of the Northwest Territories and Nunavut and (b) four locations of Victoria Island. Between these geographic populations, we found that differences in the microbiome reflected host-associated genetic cluster with evidence of migration. Within populations, seasonality influenced bacterial diversity with no significant differences between years of sampling. We found evidence of pathogenic bacteria, with significantly higher presence in mainland samples. Our findings demonstrate the effects of seasonality and the role of host population-level structure in driving fecal microbiome differences in a large Arctic mammal.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Canadian Arctic; Ovibos moschatus; fecal microbiome; muskox; population structure
Year: 2019 PMID: 31871639 PMCID: PMC6912892 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Location, season, and year of collection for sampling sites analyzed in this study. The natural range of muskoxen is shown in light gray. Sample pattern denotes the season of collection (winter, summer, or spring), while year of sampling and sample size, in parenthesis, are indicated by the number next to the marker image. The arrow represents the hypothesized muskox migration route between Mainland and Victoria Island (Kutz et al., 2015)
Figure 2Taxonomic relative abundance plot of the bacterial orders from the merged sequencing run as classified by QIIME2. Samples are organized by year of collection
Figure 3Venn diagrams represent the number of shared ASVs from (a) nonrarefied data between Mainland and Victoria Island populations, and between (b) spring and (c) summer seasons. Putative migrant individuals were removed. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the percentage of total ASVs that were unique or shared between the two populations
Figure 4A comparison of alpha diversity metrics of nonrarefied data between Mainland and Victoria Island (top) and between all sampling regions (bottom). Mainland regions: Norman Wells, NWT (denoted Northwest Territories) and Kitikmeot Region, NU. Victoria Island regions: Ulukhaktok, NWT; Central Victoria Island, NU; Cambridge Bay, NU; North Victoria Island, NU
Figure 5Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plots of the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index matrix. Left: Plot for all samples analyzed in this study. Legend shows different sampling locations (represented by different symbols) and season (different colors). Right: Within‐site variation among the Victoria Island samples based on year of sampling (symbols) and season (colors). The percent of variation explained by each axis is shown in square brackets
Figure 6DAPC plots showing the number of clusters (K = 2) for fecal microbiome (a) and nuclear microsatellites (b). Each column represents a different individual, and colors represent the assigned population to each sample. Samples were grouped by population of origin (Victoria Island or Mainland). Putative migrant samples are identified by asterisks shown above the bars
Potential pathogens and their respective prevalence (%) in Mainland and Victoria island populations
| Genus and corresponding OTU IDs | BLAST | Query Cover % | Ident % | Likely pathogenic? | Prevalence % | # Samples Mainland (Season & Year) | # Samples Victoria Island (Season & Year) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mainland ( | Victoria Island ( | |||||||
| Arthrobacter; uncultured |
| 100 | 100 | Yes; Arthrobacter luteolus has prev. been isolated from human wounds1 | 31% | 40% | 10 (Spring, 2016) |
1 (Winter, 2009) 1 (May, 2013) 5 (Summer, 2013) 10 (Winter, 2014) |
| Enterrococcus; uncultured |
| 100 | 100 | Yes; prev. isolated from humans as the cause for bacteremia infections—considered alone to have low pathogenic potential2 | 0% | 2% | – | 1 (Summer, 2013) |
| Streptococcus; uncultured |
| 100 | 100 | Yes; associated with infection in humans3,4 | 3% | 0% | 1 (Spring, 2016) | – |
| Yersinia; uncultured |
| 100 | 100 | Yes; a human pathogen associated with abscess following trauma prev. isolated from environmental samples5 | 3% | 0% | 1 (Spring, 2016) | – |
| Mycoplasma; ambiguous taxa | Uncultured | 100 | 98 | Yes; prev. isolated from blood of bats and may be associated with hemotropic mycoplasma6 | 19%* | 0% |
1 (Summer, 2007) 5 (Spring, 2016) | ‐ |
| Escherichia‐Shigella; unknown |
| 100 | 100 | Yes, associated with infections of human wounds and diseases in animals7 | 66%* | 33% |
2 (Summer, 2007) 19 (Spring, 2016) |
1 (Winter, 2009) 2 (Winter, 2014) 3 (Summer, 2013) 8 (Spring, 2013) |
| Pseudomonas; ambiguous taxa |
| 100 | 100 | Yes; an opportunistic pathogen associated with bacteremia in humans8 | 38%* | 0% | 12 (Spring, 2016) | – |
|
| 100 | 100 | Yes; a plant pathogen9 | |||||
| Pseudomonas; uncultured |
| 100 | 100 | Yes; an opportunistic fish pathogen10 | 25%* | 0% | 8 (Spring, 2016) | – |
ASVs with a significant higher prevalence in the Mainland population are marked with an asterisk (*Fisher's exact test, p < .05).