Literature DB >> 31871611

Clinicopathological study and outcomes of primary extranodal lymphoma.

Nichapa Nanthakwang1, Ekarat Rattarittamrong1, Thanawat Rattanathammethee1, Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha1, Adisak Tantiworawit1, Lalita Norrasethada1, Charin Ya-In2.   

Abstract

Lymphoma can present with either lymphadenopathy or extranodal involvement. There are limited clinicopathological data pertaining to the occurrence of primary extranodal lymphoma (pENL) in Thailand. This was a retrospective study conducted at Chiang-Mai University Hospital from 2012 to 2016. Patients 18 years of age and over and with a diagnosis of pENL were enrolled onto study. Data related to clinical presentations, histology, stage, treatment and response were collected. There were 104 pENL patients with a median age of 63 years included. The most common presentation was gastrointestinal symptoms (41%), followed by ear, nose, and throat symptoms (35%). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common morphological subtype (60%), followed by marginal zone lymphoma (15%). The majority of patients presented with stage II disease (55%). The five-year overall survival rate was 71%. The factors associated with mortality were hemoglobin <7 g/dL, B-symptoms and LDH above upper normal limits. This study illustrated that lymphoma can present at various extranodal sites. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common presentations and DLBCL was the most common subtype of pENL. ©Copyright: the Author(s), 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Extranodal lymphoma; Lymphoma; Marginal zone lymphoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 31871611      PMCID: PMC6902274          DOI: 10.4081/hr.2019.8227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Rep        ISSN: 2038-8322


Introduction

Lymphoma is the most common hematologic malignancy and ranks as the seventh most common form of cancer.[1] The majority of cases are non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in particular B-cell lymphoma.[2] In the World Cancer Report 2014 the estimated incidence of NHL was 6.0 and 4.1 per 100,000 in males and females, respectively.[3] Although a common presentation of lymphoma is lymphadenopathy,[4] some patients present with symptoms of extranodal involvement including the gastrointestinal (GI), neurological, and dermatological systems which may lead to a delay in diagnosis and treatment.[5] A review of relevant literature resulted in the collection of data from various countries about epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathological results, and treatment outcomes related to extranodal lymphoma. The population-based NHL registry from the Netherlands showed 34% (389/1168) of NHL patients were classified as primary extranodal NHL (pENL) defined by presentation in other tissues and organs than the lymph nodes, including Waldeyer’s ring, spleen or bone marrow, without or with only minor lymph node involvement. The prevalence decreased to 20% if patients with disseminated disease presenting in an extranodal site were excluded.[6] A study of 6382 lymphoma patients from Southwest China reported that at diagnosis 53.5% of all NHL cases presented in extranodal sites since Waldeyer’s ring was also included in extranodal sites in this study.[7] A Dutch study showed that the GI tract was the most common site of pENL (45.7%)[6] whereas it was the second most common site in the Chinese study after Waldeyer’s ring (22.3% and 23.7% and respectively).[7] Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common histological subtype of pENL in both studies, accounting for 50% and 42.2%, respectively.[6,7] However, the second most common subtypes differed in the two studies, with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) being second in the Dutch study and extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL) in the Chinese study.[6,7] In addition, other studies from Kuwait[8] and India[9] showed follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma of mucosal associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) respectively accounted for the second highest prevalence after DLBCL. Investigation into treatment outcomes of pENL, showed no difference in complete response (CR) rates, and overall survival (OS) of pENL and primary nodal NHL in the Netherlands study.[6] In contrast, the OS of a high-grade lymphoma subgroup of pENL was significantly lower than the nodal high-grade NHL in the study carried out in Kuwait.[8] Since the epidemiology, clinical presentations, pathology, and outcomes of pENL differed across studies the primary objective of this study was to gather data regarding clinicopathological features and treatment responses of pENL in Chiang Mai University Hospital in Thailand. The secondary objective was to determine the OS and factors that influence the OS in patients with pENL.

Materials and Methods

Study overview

This was a retrospective study conducted in Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. Patients aged >18 years who were diagnosed with lymphoma according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification[10] by hematopathologists and had a pENL defined by presentation in extranodal organs (organs other than the lymph nodes, Waldeyer’s ring, and spleen)[11] without or with only minor lymph node involvement were enrolled. Patients with lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma were excluded. Staging of lymphoma was done by clinical evaluation, computed tomography (CT) scans and bone marrow biopsy as in the standard recommendations and classified according to the modified Ann Arbor staging.[11] Treatment of lymphomas were based on Thai national guidelines. [12] Rituximab was given only in patients who indicated B-cell NHL who could access reimbursement by the government or self-pay during this period. The demographic data (age, sex), clinical signs and symptoms at presentation (GI tract, earnose- throat [ENT], hematological, nervous system, skin, urology, gynecology), stage of cancer, International Prognostic Index (IPI),[13] pathological results, complete blood count (CBC) results, treatment modalities (chemotherapy, radiation therapy [RT], and surgery), response according to Lugano Classification[11] (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], and progressive disease [PD]), and survival outcomes were obtained from the medical records. This study was approved by the Institutional Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

Data concerning clinical presentations, laboratory, histology, stage, IPI, treatment, and causes of death were presented as descriptive analysis. Dichotomous variables were presented as percentage or ratio. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (range). Overall survival was defined as the time from diagnosis to death from any cause or the last follow-up was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier Method. Factors affecting OS were analyzed by univariate and multivariable methods using Cox proportional hazard model. SPSS version 23.0 was used for data analysis.

Results

Clinical manifestations

There were 104 patients with pENL enrolled onto this study with 57 of the patients being male (54.8%) as shown in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 63 years (range 32-93). The majority of patients (41.3%) had GI tract involvement followed by ENT (34.6%), skin (6.7%), and CNS (3.8%). B-symptoms presented in 46.2% of patients. Mean hemoglobin was 12±1.9 g/dL and mean LDH was 167±88 U/L (normal range 135-225) with 17 patients (16.3%) having an LDH above the normal upper limit. Thirteen patients (12.3%) had bulky disease (tumor more than 10 cm).[11] The majority of patients presented with early stages of the disease (stage I 20.2% and stage II 54.8%) and low to low-intermediate IPI (20.2%, 58.7%, and 20.2% had score 0, 1, and 2, respectively).
Table 1.

Patient characteristics (N=104).

Characteristics
Age (years)Age, Median (range)63 (32-93)
Sex, N (%)Male57 (54.8)
Primary site, N (%)Gastrointestinal tract43 (41.3)
Ear nose throat36 (34.6)
Skin7 (6.7)
Central nervous system4 (3.8)
Eye3 (2.9)
Urological3 (2.9)
Gynecological1(1)
Hematological1(1)
Other6 (5.8)
B symptomsPresent48 (46.2)
Histology 
B-cell, N (%)DLBCL62 (59.6)
MALT16 (15.4)
MALT with large cell transformation9 (8.7)
Burkitt’s lymphoma2 (1.9)
FL1(1)
T-cell, N (%)PTCL NOS12 (11.5)
ENKTL1(1)
Hodgkin, N (%) 1(1)
CBC Mean ± SDHemoglobin (g/dL)12 ± 1.9
WBC (cell/mm³)7341 ± 3210
Platelet (cell/.mm³)315288 ± 124658
LDH, N(%)Above upper normal limits17 (16.3)
Stage, N (%)I21 (20.2)
II57 (54.8)
IV26 (25.0)
Tumor bulk, N (%) 13 (12.5)
IPI, N (%)021 (20.2)
161 (58.7)
221 (20.2)
31 (0.9)
40 (0)
50 (0)
Bone marrow involvement, N (%)11 (10.6)

DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MALT: marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; PTCL NOS: peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified; ENKTL: extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type; FL: follicular lymphoma; CBC: complete blood count; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; IPI: International Prognostic Index.

Regarding clinical presentations in patients with GI tract involvement, abdominal pain was the most common symptom (33 patients, 76%) followed by GI hemorrhage and abdominal mass. The stomach was the most common site of involvement (55%). In the case of ENT presentation, epistaxis and nasal congestion were the most common symptoms (7 patients each, 19%) and the nasal cavity was the most common site of tissue diagnosis (36%). Other ENT patients presented with a sore throat, mass in oral cavity (tongue, gum, and palate), thyroid mass, and hoarseness of voice.

Pathological aspect

DLBCL was the most common morphological subtype (62 patients, 59.6%), followed by marginal zone lymphoma of MALT (24% with 8.7% having large cell transformation), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) (11.2%). A biopsy was carried out in the affected organs in all patients. The association of histological subtypes and organ involvement is described in Table 2.
Table 2.

Histological subtypes of primary extranodal lymphoma according to organ involvement.

Primary organNo. (%)Histological subtype
Gastrointestinal tract43 (41.3)
    Stomach24 (23.1)15 DLBCL, 6 MALT, 3 MALT with large cell
    Small bowel11 (10.6)5 DLBCL, 3 MALT, 1 MALT with large cell, 1 PTCL NOS, 1 Hodgkin
    Large bowel4 (3.8)2 DLBCL, 1 MALT, 1 PTCL NOS
    Mesenteric mass4 (3.8)3 DLBCL, 1 Burkitt
Ear nose throat36 (34.6)
    Nasal cavity13 (12.5)6 DLBCL, 4 PTCL NOS, 2 MALT, 1 ENKTL
    Nasopharynx6 (5.8)6 DLBCL
    Thyroid5 (4.8)3 MALT with large cell, 2 DLBCL
    Tongue5 (4.8)3 DLBCL, 2 PTCL NOS
    Parotid gland2 (1.9)1 DLBCL, 1 PTCL NOS
    Supraglottic mass1 (0.9)1 PTCL NOS
    Gum1 (0.9)1 DLBCL
    Maxillary sinus1 (0.9)1 DLBCL
    Submandibular salivary gland1 (0.9)1 FL
    Soft palate1 (0.9)1 DLBCL
Skin7 (6.7)3 DLBCL, 2 PTCL NOS, 1 MALT, 1 MALT with large cell
CNS (Brain)4 (3.8)4 DLBCL
Eye (Orbit)3 (2.9)3 MALT
Urological (Testis)3 (2.9)3 DLBCL
Gynecological (Pelvic mass)1 (0.9)1 Burkitt
Hematological (Bone marrow)1 (0.9)1 DLBCL
Other6 (5.8)
    Bone4 (3.8)4 DLBCL
    Breast2 (1.9)1 DLBCL, 1 MALT with large cell

DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MALT: marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; MALT with large cell: marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue with large cell transformation; PTCL NOS: peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified; ENKTL: extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type; FL: follicular lymphoma.

Treatment and outcomes

About half of the patients received chemotherapy alone (56 patients, 53.8%), followed by chemotherapy and surgery (24 patients, 23.1%), chemotherapy and RT (16 patients, 15.4%), RT alone (4 patients, 3.8%), combined chemotherapy, RT, and surgery (2 patients, 1.9%), surgery alone (1 patient, 0.96%), and palliative care (1 patient, 0.96%). In the majority of the patients there was a measurable response with an overall response rate (ORR) of 91.3% (95 patients) with a CR rate of 78.8% (83 patients), and a PR rate of 12.5% (13 patients). Eight patients (7.7%) had PD and 1 patient (0.96%) had SD. A relapse in the disease occurred in 17 patients (16.3%) Patient characteristics (N=104). DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MALT: marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; PTCL NOS: peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified; ENKTL: extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type; FL: follicular lymphoma; CBC: complete blood count; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; IPI: International Prognostic Index. With the median follow-up time of 163 months (range 0-351 months), seven patients (6.7%; 3 DLBCL and 4 PTCL) had died, the most common cause of death being progression of the disease (4 patients; 57.1%). Other causes included heart failure, myocardial infarction, and septic shock (1 patient in each case; 14.2%). The five-year survival rate was 71% and the median overall survival was 131 months (range 0-351 months) (Figure 1). Table 3 shows the survival of pENL patients related to the primary site. Patients with the primary cancer being ENT and GI tract lymphoma had a 5- year OS of 71% and 92%, respectively, whereas almost all patients with other primary sites had a 100% survival at 5 years. According to histological subtypes, pENL with DLBCL had a 5-year OS of 95% and the corresponding figure for PTCL was 56%. Associated factors of mortality from the multivariable analysis were anemia (Hb < 7 g/dL) (P=0.003) (95% CI 2.70-36.76), presence of B-symptoms (P=0.047) (95% CI 1.90-6.40), and LDH above upper normal limits (P=0.013) (95% CI 2.55-11.41). Other factors including age, primary site, histological subtype, stage, IPI, tumor bulk, and bone marrow involvement were not significantly associated with OS (Table 4).
Figure 1.

Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing overall survival in patients with primary extranodal lymphoma.

Table 3.

Five-year overall survival of patients related to the primary site.

Primary siteNumber (N = 104)Death (N = 7)5-year OS (%)
Gastrointestinal tract44292
Ear nose throat36371
Skin70100
Central nervous system40100
Eye30100
Urological30100
Gynecological10100
Hematological110
Other61*83

*Primary site in the bone (humerus).

Table 4.

Association of factors with mortality in patients with primary extranodal lymphoma.

Factors95% CIP-value
Age0.50-2.430.373
Primary site0.82 – 2.990.254
Presence of B-symptom1.90 – 6.400.047
Histology0.42 – 1.450.153
Low hemoglobin (<7 g/dL)2.70 – 36.760.003
LDH above upper normal limit2.55 – 11.410.013
Stage (III, IV)0.17 – 2.280.352
Bulky mass0.28 – 2.550.592
IPI (>2)0.26 – 1.520.263
Bone marrow involvement0.49 – 2.100.554
Relapse0.70 – 1.900.321

LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; IPI: International Prognostic Index.

Discussion and Conclusions

This study demonstrates variations in the presentation, histology, and treatment outcomes of pENL. The prevalence of pENL was not studied but a recent study by the Thai Lymphoma Study Group (TLSG) that collected data from 4056 patients in 13 major hospitals in Thailand showed that 49.6% had undergone diagnostic tissue biopsy from sites other than the lymph nodes and bone marrow but the percentage of pENL was not described.[14] As a result, the prevalence of pENL in Thailand might be less than 50%. Kaplan–Meier survival curve showing overall survival in patients with primary extranodal lymphoma. Histological subtypes of primary extranodal lymphoma according to organ involvement. DLBCL: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MALT: marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue; MALT with large cell: marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue with large cell transformation; PTCL NOS: peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified; ENKTL: extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type; FL: follicular lymphoma. The most common organ involved with pENL was found to be the GI tract which accounted for about 40% and more than half of these patients had gastric involvement. This finding corresponded with other studies from the Netherlands (GI tract involvement of 45.7%),[6] Greece (50.3%),[15] Kuwait (43%),[8] Taiwan (47.2%),[16] and Japan (30.4%).[17] Although bone marrow was the most common site of diagnosis of lymphoid neoplasms in Korea which included plasma cell myeloma and precursor lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, the GI tract was also the subsequent most common extranodal organ involved (30.4% and 18.3% of all lymphoid neoplasms, respectively). [18] In contrast, the central nervous system (CNS) constituted the most common extranodal site in an Indian study (29.7%), ahead of the GI tract (25%) even there was no human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related CNS lymphoma in this cohort.[9] The author suggested that it might have been identified more efficiently due to improvements in neuroimaging and stereotactic brain biopsy techniques. The result that the stomach was the most common organ in the GI tract involved in the lymphoma was consistent across many studies.[6,8,9,15-17] The other site in which pENL was most commonly found were those associated with ENT. These comprised approximately 35% in our study. In a study in Southwest China, nose, sinuses, and Waldeyer’s ring (including the tonsils, palate, nasopharynx, pharynx and base of tongue) were the sites most frequently involved in pENL (44.1% compared with the GI tract, 22.3%).[7] ENKTL[7,19] and orbital adnexal MALT lymphoma[14] had a higher prevalence in East Asia, which could be explained by the higher proportion of ENT involvement (23.2-44.1%)[7,16,17] in these countries as well as in this study compared with Western countries (11%-22.6%).[6,15] Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common histological subtype of pENL found in the current study (59.6%), a similar finding to all other cited studies (40-71%).[6-9,15,17] MALT lymphoma was the second most prevalent (15.4%) as it was in the studies from India (13.2%),[9] Greece (10.7%),[15] Korea (31.1%),[18] and in a human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 nonendemic area in Japan (13.3%).[17] The corresponding figures were different among various countries including the Netherlands (CLL/SLL, 11%),[6] Kuwait (FL, 32%),[8] and China (ENKTL, 26.2%).[7] Thus, ENKTL in the current study (1%) and in the TLSG cohort (2.7%) did not have the same prevalence as in China and MALT lymphoma was less common than Korea. Compared with the recent large TLSG cohort from Thailand, DLBCL, FL, and MALT lymphoma accounted for the vast majority of lymphomas (58.1%, 5.6%, and 5.2%, respectively) including both nodal and extranodal lymphomas. This might be explained by FL usually presenting as a nodal disease in contrast to MALT lymphoma. [10] Other demographic data pertinent to pENL in the current study included a median age of 63 years with a slight male predominance (ratio 1.2: 1) which was comparable with the TLSG cohort (median age of 56 years with male to female ratio of 1.3: 1). However, pENL in Thai patients tended to occur at a younger age than it did in western countries which reported a median age of more than 65 years.[6,15] In addition a study from India showed the mean age of pENL patients to be 43 years, even lower than our current study, as well as less than nodal NHL (58 years).[9] No significant difference in the age of patients with pENL and nodal NHL was found in the Dutch study (65 and 67 years, respectively).[6] This was found to be the opposite in the Japanese study (pENL had higher mean age of 61 years, P<0.001).[17] The majority of pENL patients in this study presented as early stages of the disease (stage I-II) and had low to low-intermediate IPI. These findings are similar to other studies into pENL carried out in both Asian[8,9,16,17] and western countries. [6] Five-year overall survival of patients related to the primary site. *Primary site in the bone (humerus). Association of factors with mortality in patients with primary extranodal lymphoma. LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; IPI: International Prognostic Index. The differences in the epidemiology of pENL in each study may be due to both genetic and environmental factors. Genome-wide association studies have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms that related with specific subtypes of lymphoma in various populations,[20] but the data from Thailand is lacking. MALT lymphoma is well recognized as an infectious- related lymphoma. The higher proportion of ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma found in comparison with gastric MALT lymphoma in this study was similar to that found in a previous TLSG study.[14] The prevalence of Chlamydia psittacosis and Helicobacter pylori infection in each country may well affect the prevalence of MALT lymphoma in these two locations,[2,4] but the studies in Thailand about this aspect are still limited. Analysis of the treatment outcomes showed a favorable response rate (CR rate of 78.8%) leading to a five-year OS of 71% with a median OS of 131 months. This may be explained by the majority of patients being in early stages of the disease (75%) with low to low-intermediate IPI (99.1%). In the study there were variations in histological subtypes of pENL and modalities of treatment as well as inaccessibility to rituximab, [21] which could influence the interpretation and cause difficulties in making direct comparison to other studies into pENL and nodal lymphoma. In addition to this point, there were conflicting data regarding the OS of pENL and nodal lymphoma, [6,8,17] partially due to the different definition of pENL.[5] In this current study that had a relatively small number of patients, anemia, B-symptoms, and high LDH were associated with OS. These factors were also found to be the prognostic factors in some subtypes of lymphoma including DLBCL and MALT lymphoma. [11,13,22,23] The limitation of this study was related to the retrospective nature which might have led to incomplete data collection and selection bias. In addition, it represented information regarding pENL from a single institution with a limited number of patients. As a result, the subgroup analysis of outcomes according to histological subtypes and primary extranodal organs might be not accurately interpreted. Nevertheless, the current study provided real world data regarding pENL in Thailand. A larger prospective multi-center study comparing information about pENL with details about primary nodal lymphoma is warranted. In conclusion, lymphoma can have various extranodal presentations. The GI tract, in particular the stomach, was the most common location of pENL treated in Chiang Mai University Hospital. DLBCL was the most common subtype of pENL found followed by MALT lymphoma.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Familial predisposition and genetic risk factors for lymphoma.

Authors:  James R Cerhan; Susan L Slager
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Primary extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): the impact of alternative definitions tested in the Comprehensive Cancer Centre West population-based NHL registry.

Authors:  A D G Krol; S le Cessie; S Snijder; J C Kluin-Nelemans; P M Kluin; E M Noordijk
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Richard I Fisher; Sally F Barrington; Franco Cavalli; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; T Andrew Lister
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A MALT lymphoma prognostic index.

Authors:  Catherine Thieblemont; Luciano Cascione; Annarita Conconi; Barbara Kiesewetter; Markus Raderer; Gianluca Gaidano; Maurizio Martelli; Daniele Laszlo; Bertrand Coiffier; Armando Lopez Guillermo; Valter Torri; Franco Cavalli; Peter W Johnson; Emanuele Zucca
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  The clinicopathological analysis of 303 cases with malignant lymphoma classified according to the World Health Organization classification system in a single institute of Taiwan.

Authors:  Wei-Liang Chen; Wen-Chiuan Tsai; Tsu-Yi Chao; Lai-Fa Sheu; Jung-Mao Chou; Woei-Yau Kao; Yeu-Chin Chen; Ching-Liang Ho
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  Primary extra nodal non Hodgkin lymphoma: a 5 year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Somanath Padhi; Tara Roshni Paul; Sundaram Challa; Aruna K Prayaga; Senthil Rajappa; D Raghunadharao; Rajlaxmi Sarangi
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

7.  Extranodal lymphoma: a comparative study.

Authors:  Salem H AlShemmari; Reem M Ameen; Kamlesh P Sajnani
Journal:  Hematology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.269

8.  Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index.

Authors:  Philippe Solal-Céligny; Pascal Roy; Philippe Colombat; Josephine White; Jim O Armitage; Reyes Arranz-Saez; Wing Y Au; Monica Bellei; Pauline Brice; Dolores Caballero; Bertrand Coiffier; Eulogio Conde-Garcia; Chantal Doyen; Massimo Federico; Richard I Fisher; Javier F Garcia-Conde; Cesare Guglielmi; Anton Hagenbeek; Corinne Haïoun; Michael LeBlanc; Andrew T Lister; Armando Lopez-Guillermo; Peter McLaughlin; Noël Milpied; Pierre Morel; Nicolas Mounier; Stephen J Proctor; Ama Rohatiner; Paul Smith; Pierre Soubeyran; Hervé Tilly; Umberto Vitolo; Pier-Luigi Zinzani; Emanuele Zucca; Emili Montserrat
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Advances in the treatment of extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type.

Authors:  Motoko Yamaguchi; Ritsuro Suzuki; Masahiko Oguchi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Subtype distribution of lymphomas in Southwest China: analysis of 6,382 cases using WHO classification in a single institution.

Authors:  Qun-Pei Yang; Wen-Yan Zhang; Jian-Bo Yu; Sha Zhao; Huan Xu; Wei-Ya Wang; Cheng-Feng Bi; Zhuo Zuo; Xiao-Qing Wang; Juan Huang; Lin Dai; Wei-Ping Liu
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.644

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mean platelet volume and cardiac-surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Abinaya Ramakrishnan; Cynthia Zheng; Manuel L Fontes; Frederic W Lombard; Austin A Woolard; Yaping Shi; Matthew S Shotwell; Frederic T Billings; Mias Pretorius; Jonathan P Wanderer; Rushikesh Vyas; Tarek S Absi; Ashish S Shah; Miklos D Kertai
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  LASSO Model Better Predicted the Prognosis of DLBCL than Random Forest Model: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of HHLWG.

Authors:  Ziyuan Shen; Shuo Zhang; Yaxue Jiao; Yuye Shi; Hao Zhang; Fei Wang; Ling Wang; Taigang Zhu; Yuqing Miao; Wei Sang; Guoqi Cai; Working Group Huaihai Lymphoma
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.