| Literature DB >> 31871480 |
Li-Wan Zhang1, Qing Guo1, Rui Fang1, Li Lin2, Bin-Hua Ye2, Kai-Lin Zheng2, Min Lin3, Zhao-Yang Yang4, Ji-Qian Fang1,5, Can-Dong Li4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine- (TCM-) guided dietary interventions in improving yang-qi deficiency and yin-blood deficiency TCM syndromes according to the principles of TCM syndrome differentiation theory in male youths undergoing drug detoxification during the rehabilitation period who stayed in a compulsory isolation detoxification center.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31871480 PMCID: PMC6913165 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3870316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flow of participants through the trial.
TCM-guided diet menu for male youth undergoing drug detoxification with yang-qi deficiency and yin-blood deficiency.
| Warms yang and invigorates qi diet | Steamed duck of Sijun, Miqin of Huaishan. Solid lean broth, black rice dangshen porridge, red Qitian Qiji, Shenqi beef soup, fried walnut with leek, Huangqi yam porridge, dangshen cooked rabbit meat, Angelica ginger and mutton soup, Chinese yam porridge, Guiqi stewed chicken, Chinese yam eel soup, lotus seed stewed pork belly, millet jujube porridge, Chinese yam steamed carrot, crucian carp stewed tofu, lotus seed and lily yam porridge, Angelica Duzhong mutton soup, steamed chicken, Astragalus steamed carp, Astragalus steamed carp and carp fish soup, reinforcing deficiency and reinforcing qi congee |
|
| |
| Nourishing yin and blood diet |
|
Diagnostic criteria of syndrome elements.
| Diagnostic criteria of disease location syndrome elements | Diagnostic criteria of disease venereal syndrome elements | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Integral of disease location syndrome elements ≥100 | Integral of disease venereal syndrome elements ≥100 | The severity of symptoms is moderate |
| Quantitative diagnostic value multiplied by 1.5 for severe symptoms | ||
| Quantitative diagnostic value multiplied by 0.7 for mild symptoms | ||
| Grade | Contribution integral of differentiation elements | |
| Level 0 | Integral < 70 | No pathological changes |
| Level 1 | 70 ≤ Integral < 100 | Mild pathological changes |
| Level 2 | 100 ≤ Integral < 150 | Moderate pathological changes |
| Level 3 | Integral ≥ 150 | Severe pathological changes |
Demographic characteristics of the two groups at baseline.
| Index | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Age | 22.10 ± 2.63 | 21.88 ± 2.90 | 0.442 | 0.660 |
|
| 1.068 | 0.301 | ||
| Han | 61 (98.4) | 58 (95.1) | ||
| Ethnic minority | 1 (1.6) | 3 (4.9) | ||
|
| 1.432 | 0.698 | ||
| Worker | 6 (9.7) | 3 (4.9) | ||
| Farmer | 2 (3.2) | 2 (3.3) | ||
| Self-employed | 9 (14.5) | 12 (19.7) | ||
| Other | 45 (72.6) | 44 (72.1) | ||
|
| 0.359 | 0.549 | ||
| Unmarried | 61 (98.4) | 59 (96.7) | ||
| Married | 1 (1.6) | 2 (3.3) | ||
|
| 2.877 | 0.237 | ||
| Elementary school | 21 (33.9) | 14 (23.0) | ||
| Secondary school | 35 (56.5) | 36 (59.0) | ||
| Junior high school or secondary specialized school and above | 6 (9.7) | 11 (18.0) | ||
|
| 0.002 | 0.999 | ||
| Low (<10000 RMB) | 11 (17.7) | 11 (18.0) | ||
| Medium (10000∼30000 RMB) | 48 (77.4) | 47 (77.0) | ||
| High (>30000 RMB) | 3 (4.8) | 3 (4.9) | ||
|
| 4.615 | 0.329 | ||
| Self-pay | 34 (54.8) | 28 (45.9) | ||
| Medical insurance for urban workers | 20 (32.3) | 27 (44.3) | ||
| Rural cooperative medical service | 1 (1.6) | 3 (4.9) | ||
| Commercial medical insurance | 1 (1.6) | 1 (1.6) | ||
| Missing | 6 (9.7) | 2 (3.3) |
Drug abuse characteristics of the two groups at baseline.
| Index | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.256 | 0.869 | ||
| 1 year | 2 (3.2) | 3 (4.9) | ||
| 2 years | 7 (11.3) | 8 (13.1) | ||
| 3 years | 18 (29.0) | 20 (32.8) | ||
| 4–6 years | 28 (45.2) | 26 (42.6) | ||
| 7–15 years | 7 (11.3) | 4 (6.6) | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 23.741 | 0.254 | ||
| Methamphetamine | 62 | 60 | ||
| Ecstasy | 16 | 7 | ||
| Ketamine (K powder) | 37 | 36 | ||
| Heroin (yellow peel/white powder) | 1 | 2 | ||
| Opium | 1 | 0 | ||
| Cocaine | 0 | 1 | ||
| Marijuana | 12 | 11 | ||
| Ephedrine | 4 | 4 | ||
| Pethidine | 0 | 1 | ||
| Morphine | 1 | 0 | ||
| Methadone | 1 | 0 | ||
| Somedon | 1 | 0 | ||
| Tramadol | 0 | 1 | ||
| GHB | 0 | 2 | ||
| Other | 0 | 1 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 31.611 | 0.386 | ||
| Smoke gun suction | 42 | 37 | ||
| Ironing suction | 24 | 32 | ||
| Nasal suction | 19 | 23 | ||
| Pipe suction | 20 | 26 | ||
| Cigarette smoking | 5 | 8 | ||
| Oral administration | 3 | 6 | ||
| Dissolve in beverage | 3 | 6 | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 1.859 | 0.602 | ||
| 0.1–0.5 g | 21 (33.9) | 20 (32.8) | ||
| 0.5–1.0 g | 26 (41.9) | 32 (52.5) | ||
| 1.0–2.0 g | 10 (16.1) | 8 (13.1) | ||
| 2 g or more | 3 (4.8) | 1 (1.6) | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 6.801 | 0.079 | ||
| 1 time | 57 (91.9) | 56 (91.8) | ||
| 2 times | 0 (0.0) | 4 (6.6) | ||
| 3 times | 4 (6.5) | 1 (1.6) | ||
| 4 times | 1 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | ||
Score changes in yang deficiency syndrome elements in the two groups.
| Indicators | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline value | 251.37 ± 112.39 | 224.52 ± 112.81 | 1.322 | 0.189 |
| Postintervention | 239.71 ± 121.46 | 281.23 ± 149.28 | −1.693 | 0.093 |
| Postintervention difference (post-pre) | −13.95 (−76.95, 52.36) | 40.70 (−22.80, 139.75) | −3.059 | 0.003 |
| Improvement (%) | 4.63 | −25.26 | ||
| Intragroup | 0.923 (0.359) | −3.075 (0.003) |
Intragroup t (P) represents the statistics and P value of pairing t-test compared with that before treatment. Mann–Whitney U test was adopted.
Changes in qi deficiency syndrome element scores in the two groups.
| Indicators | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline value | 264.41 ± 106.65 | 227.77 ± 99.88 | 1.966 | 0.052 |
| Postintervention | 235.29 ± 115.47 | 264.68 ± 137.56 | −1.284 | 0.202 |
| Postintervention difference (post-pre) | −28.85 (−77.30, 37.50) | 20.90 (−29.90, 108.15) | −3.303 | 0.003 |
| Improvement (%) | 11.01 | −16.20 | ||
| Intragroup | 2.690 (0.009) | −2.196 (0.032) |
Intragroup t (P) represents the statistics and P value of paired t-test compared with that before treatment. Mann–Whitney U test is adopted.
Change in the sum of scores of yang-qi deficiency syndrome elements in the two groups.
| Indicators | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline value | 515.78 ± 215.61 | 452.29 ± 210.08 | 1.654 | 0.101 |
| Postintervention | 475.00 ± 233.86 | 545.91 ± 284.95 | −1.510 | 0.134 |
| Postintervention difference (post-pre) | −38.05 (−131.48, 82.13) | 67.80 (−47.85, 244.90) | −3.225 | 0.003 |
| Improvement (%) | 7.91 | −20.70 | ||
| Intragroup | 1.785 (0.079) | −2.686 (0.009) |
Intragroup t (P) represents the statistics and P value of paired t-test compared with that before treatment. Mann–Whitney U test is adopted.
Score changes in yin deficiency syndrome elements in the two groups.
| Indicators | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline value | 239.92 ± 98.19 | 208.66 ± 88.60 | 1.852 | 0.066 |
| Postintervention | 201.57 ± 106.39 | 229.82 ± 122.63 | −1.365 | 0.175 |
| Postintervention difference (post-pre) | −36.85 (−82.70, 15.38) | 12.00 (−35.45, 80.15) | −3.538 | 0.001 |
| Improvement (%) | 15.98 | −10.14 | ||
| Intragroup | 4.034 (0.001) | −1.525 (0.133) |
Intragroup t (P) represents the statistics and P value of paired t-test compared with that before treatment. Mann–Whitney U test was adopted.
Score changes in blood deficiency syndrome elements in the two groups.
| Indicators | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline value | 233.19 ± 99.61 | 207.82 ± 85.15 | 1.517 | 0.132 |
| Postintervention | 205.98 ± 106.20 | 233.96 ± 119.73 | −1.372 | 0.173 |
| Postintervention difference (post-pre) | −22.40 (−72.23, 13.53) | 20.00 (−45.95, 79.50) | −3.173 | 0.005 |
| Improvement (%) | 11.67 | −12.58 | ||
| Intragroup | 2.888 (0.005) | −1.877 (0.065) |
Intragroup t (P) represents the statistics and P value of paired t-test compared with that before treatment. Mann–Whitney U test was adopted.
Change in the sum of scores of yin-blood deficiency syndrome elements in the two groups.
| Indicators | Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline value | 473.11 ± 194.16 | 416.49 ± 170.29 | 1.718 | 0.088 |
| Postintervention | 407.55 ± 209.53 | 463.78 ± 240.57 | −1.383 | 0.169 |
| Postintervention difference (post-pre) | −57.20 (−155.20, 21.93) | 23.50 (−76.40, 157.30) | −3.419 | 0.002 |
| Improvement (%) | 13.86 | −11.35 | ||
| Intragroup | 3.579 (0.001) | −1.723 (0.090) |
Intragroup t (P) represents the statistics and P value of paired t-test compared with that before treatment. Mann–Whitney U test was adopted.
The vital signs before and after the intervention in the two groups.
| Index | Baseline | After 3 months | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
| Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
| |
| Height (cm) | 169.80 ± 5.95 | 168.87 ± 6.39 | 0.646 (0.520) | 169.72 ± 5.97 | 168.81 ± 6.42 | 0.633 (0.529) |
| Weight (kg) | 70.26 ± 11.02 | 68.28 ± 8.68 | 0.861 (0.392) | 72.16 ± 11.73 | 69.14 ± 10.53 | 1.169 (0.246) |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 124.92 ± 11.20 | 128.61 ± 13.26 | −1.289 (0.201) | 124.94 ± 12.82 | 122.40 ± 12.04 | 0.882 (0.381) |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 76.08 ± 10.30 | 74.97 ± 8.25 | 0.513 (0.610) | 76.81 ± 9.41 | 74.55 ± 11.57 | 0.916 (0.363) |
| Pulse (times/points) | 70 ± 11 | 68 ± 10 | 0.741 (0.461) | 73 ± 14 | 73 ± 10 | 0.020 (0.984) |
Intragroup t (P) represents the statistics and P value of the paired t-test compared with that before treatment. Mann–Whitney U test was adopted.