Mu A1, Tak Shun Fung1, Lisa M Francomacaro1, Thao Huynh1, Tommi Kotila2, Zdenek Svindrych1, Henry N Higgs3. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755. 2. HiLIFE Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland. 3. Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755; henry.higgs@dartmouth.edu.
Abstract
INF2 is a formin protein that accelerates actin polymerization. A common mechanism for formin regulation is autoinhibition, through interaction between the N-terminal diaphanous inhibitory domain (DID) and C-terminal diaphanous autoregulatory domain (DAD). We recently showed that INF2 uses a variant of this mechanism that we term "facilitated autoinhibition," whereby a complex consisting of cyclase-associated protein (CAP) bound to lysine-acetylated actin (KAc-actin) is required for INF2 inhibition, in a manner requiring INF2-DID. Deacetylation of actin in the CAP/KAc-actin complex activates INF2. Here we use lysine-to-glutamine mutations as acetylmimetics to map the relevant lysines on actin for INF2 regulation, focusing on K50, K61, and K328. Biochemically, K50Q- and K61Q-actin, when bound to CAP2, inhibit full-length INF2 but not INF2 lacking DID. When not bound to CAP, these mutant actins polymerize similarly to WT-actin in the presence or absence of INF2, suggesting that the effect of the mutation is directly on INF2 regulation. In U2OS cells, K50Q- and K61Q-actin inhibit INF2-mediated actin polymerization when expressed at low levels. Direct-binding studies show that the CAP WH2 domain binds INF2-DID with submicromolar affinity but has weak affinity for actin monomers, while INF2-DAD binds CAP/K50Q-actin 5-fold better than CAP/WT-actin. Actin in complex with full-length CAP2 is predominately ATP-bound. These interactions suggest an inhibition model whereby CAP/KAc-actin serves as a bridge between INF2 DID and DAD. In U2OS cells, INF2 is 90-fold and 5-fold less abundant than CAP1 and CAP2, respectively, suggesting that there is sufficient CAP for full INF2 inhibition.
INF2 is a formin protein that accelerates actin polymerization. A common mechanism for formin regulation is autoinhibition, through interaction between the N-terminal diaphanous inhibitory domain (DID) and C-terminal diaphanous autoregulatory domain (DAD). We recently showed that n class="Gene">INF2 uses a variant of this mechanism that we term "facilitated autoinhibition," whereby a complex consisting of cyclase-associated protein (CAP) bound to lysine-acetylated actin (KAc-actin) is required for INF2 inhibition, in a manner requiring INF2-DID. Deacetylation of actin in the CAP/KAc-actin complex activates INF2. Here we use lysine-to-glutamine mutations as acetylmimetics to map the relevant lysines on actin for INF2 regulation, focusing on K50, K61, and K328. Biochemically, K50Q- and K61Q-actin, when bound to CAP2, inhibit full-length INF2 but not INF2 lacking DID. When not bound to CAP, these mutant actins polymerize similarly to WT-actin in the presence or absence of INF2, suggesting that the effect of the mutation is directly on INF2 regulation. In U2OS cells, K50Q- and K61Q-actin inhibit INF2-mediated actin polymerization when expressed at low levels. Direct-binding studies show that the CAP WH2 domain binds INF2-DID with submicromolar affinity but has weak affinity for actin monomers, while INF2-DAD binds CAP/K50Q-actin 5-fold better than CAP/WT-actin. Actin in complex with full-length CAP2 is predominately ATP-bound. These interactions suggest an inhibition model whereby CAP/KAc-actin serves as a bridge between INF2 DID and DAD. In U2OS cells, INF2 is 90-fold and 5-fold less abundant than CAP1 and CAP2, respectively, suggesting that there is sufficient CAP for full INF2 inhibition.
Authors: Xiaowei Shao; Qingsen Li; Alex Mogilner; Alexander D Bershadsky; G V Shivashankar Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Meera C Viswanathan; Anna C Blice-Baum; William Schmidt; D Brian Foster; Anthony Cammarato Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Ronen Schneider; Konstantin Deutsch; Gregory J Hoeprich; Jonathan Marquez; Tobias Hermle; Daniela A Braun; Steve Seltzsam; Thomas M Kitzler; Youying Mao; Florian Buerger; Amar J Majmundar; Ana C Onuchic-Whitford; Caroline M Kolvenbach; Luca Schierbaum; Sophia Schneider; Abdul A Halawi; Makiko Nakayama; Nina Mann; Dervla M Connaughton; Verena Klämbt; Matias Wagner; Korbinian M Riedhammer; Lutz Renders; Yoshichika Katsura; Dean Thumkeo; Neveen A Soliman; Shrikant Mane; Richard P Lifton; Shirlee Shril; Mustafa K Khokha; Julia Hoefele; Bruce L Goode; Friedhelm Hildebrandt Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Rachel H Ceron; Peter J Carman; Grzegorz Rebowski; Malgorzata Boczkowska; Robert O Heuckeroth; Roberto Dominguez Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Frieda Kage; Miguel Vicente-Manzanares; Brennan C McEwan; Arminja N Kettenbach; Henry N Higgs Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Barbara Calabrese; Steven L Jones; Yoko Shiraishi-Yamaguchi; Michael Lingelbach; Uri Manor; Tatyana M Svitkina; Henry N Higgs; Andy Y Shih; Shelley Halpain Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-10-13 Impact factor: 17.694