| Literature DB >> 31870644 |
Rachelle Shafei1, Ione O C Woollacott1, Catherine J Mummery1, Martina Bocchetta1, Rita Guerreiro2, Jose Bras2, Jason D Warren1, Tammaryn Lashley3, Zane Jaunmuktane4, Jonathan D Rohrer5.
Abstract
MAPT mutations were the first discovered genetic cause of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in 1998. Since that time, over 60 MAPT mutations have been identified, usually causing behavioral variant FTD and/or parkinsonism clinically. We describe 2 novel MAPT mutations, D252V and G389_I392del, each presenting in a patient with behavioral variant FTD and associated language and cognitive deficits. Neuroimaging revealed asymmetrical left greater than right temporal lobe atrophy in the first case, and bifrontal atrophy in the second case. Disease duration was 8 years and 5 years, respectively. Postmortem examination in both patients revealed a 3-repeat predominant tauopathy, similar in appearance to Pick's disease. These 2 mutations add to the literature on genetic FTD, both presenting with similar clinical and imaging features to previously described cases, and pathologically showing a primary tauopathy similar to a number of other MAPT mutations.Entities:
Keywords: Frontotemporal dementia; MAPT; Tau
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31870644 PMCID: PMC7082764 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.11.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurobiol Aging ISSN: 0197-4580 Impact factor: 4.673
Figure 1Magnetic resonance imaging of case 1 (A) and case 2 (B) showing coronal volumetric T1 (case 1) and FLAIR (case 2) scans. Asymmetrical, left more than right, temporal greater than frontal atrophy is seen in case 1, whereas in case 2, there is relatively symmetrical bilateral frontal more than temporal lobe atrophy.
Fig. 2Macroscopic and microscopic pathology and schematic representation of case 1 (A1–A14) and case 2 (B1–B14). Prominent frontal lobe atrophy is seen on the medial surface in case 1 (A1) and on the convex lateral surface in case 2 (B1) (sharp, knife-edge frontal lobe atrophy with some sparing of the motor cortex in both cases is highlighted with white arrows). Frontal lobe atrophy is also evident on the coronal sections of both cases (A2, A3, B2, and B3). The anterior temporal lobe at the level of the anterior commissure (AC) shows particularly severe atrophy in case 1 (A2, white arrow), and comparably less severe medial atrophy with better preservation of the superior anterior temporal gyrus in case 2 (B2, white arrow). At the level of the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) in case 1, there is very severe atrophy of the hippocampus, parahippocampal and inferior temporal gyri, middle temporal gyrus (MTG), and superior temporal gyrus (STG), with better preservation of the Heschl's gyrus (HG) (A3). In case 2, there is prominent atrophy of the hippocampus, parahippocampal, inferior and middle temporal gyri, with much better preservation of the STG and HG (B3). The frontal horns of the lateral ventricles are severely dilated in both cases (A1, A2, A3, B2, and B3) and the temporal horn is severely dilated in case 1 (A3). Also, the 3rd ventricles are dilated in both cases (A3 and B3). In case 1, there is marked atrophy of the caudate nucleus (A2, green arrow) and in both cases, there is globus pallidus (A2 and B2) and mild thalamus atrophy (A3 and B3). In the midbrain at the level of the red nucleus (RN) in both cases, there is conspicuous atrophy of the frontopontine tracts (A4 and B4, red arrows,) and pallor of the substantia nigra, which shows rusty discoloration in case 1. Schematic representation of the extent of atrophy and tau pathology severity is demonstrated for case 1 (A5 and A6) and case 2 (B5 and B6, dark red represents the most severe pathology, amber scanty atrophy and tau pathology, and uncolored corresponds to areas with preserved cytoarchitecture and absent tau pathology). Very severe pan-cortical frontal lobe atrophy with rarefaction of the neuropil and prominent gliosis is confirmed in both cases (A7 and B7, corresponding regions highlighted as red squares in A1 and B1). In case 1, across the frontal lobe, in addition to Pick bodies (A8, blue arrow), there is widespread cortical astrocytic tau pathology, resembling ramified and tufted astrocytes (yellow arrow). Pick bodies show positive immunolabeling for 3R tau (A9, blue arrow) and a proportion of the astrocytic tau pathology is immunoreactive for 4R tau (A10, yellow arrow). In the frontal lobe of case 2, there is a dense meshwork of tau positive neuropil threads and frequent Pick bodies (B8, blue arrow). 3R tau immunostaining accentuates Pick bodies (B9, blue arrow) and also highlights occasional astrocytic tau pathology (yellow arrow), while immunostaining for 4R tau (B10) is negative. In case 1, there is severe atrophy of STG and better preserved cortical cytoarchitecture in HG (A11). In case 2, MTG shows severe atrophy, but the cytoarchitecture of STG is much better preserved (B11, corresponding macroscopic regions are highlighted with blue squares in A3 and B3). Density of hyper-phosphorylated tau pathology in the medial temporal lobes of both cases reflects the degree of cortical atrophy; in case 1, tau pathology extends into HG (A12), but in case 2, tau pathology is minimal in the superior aspect of the STG and in HG (B12). In case 1, there is a very severe atrophy of the dentate gyrus with tau-positive Pick bodies seen in the residual granule cells (A13 and A14, blue arrows). Granule cells of the dentate gyrus in case 2 are comparably better preserved, with numerous Pick bodies evident in the residual neurones (B13 and B14, blue arrows highlight representative inclusions). Scale bar: 300 μm in A11 and B11; 600 μm A12 and B12; 100 μm in A7, A8, B7, and B8; 50 μm in A9, A10, B9, and B10; and 30 μm in A13, A14, B13, and B14. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)