| Literature DB >> 31870447 |
Alem Desta Wuneh1, Araya Abrha Medhanyie2, Afework Mulugeta Bezabih2, Lars Åke Persson3,4, Joanna Schellenberg3, Yemisrach Behailu Okwaraji3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the pro-poor health policies in Ethiopia, the utilization of maternal, neonatal, and child health services remains a challenge for the country. Health equity became central in the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals globally and is a priority for Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to assess equity in utilization of a range of maternal and child health services by applying absolute and relative equity indices.Entities:
Keywords: Child health services utilization; Concentration index; Ethiopia; Maternal health services utilization; Slope index of inequity; Wealth quintile; Wealth-based equity
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31870447 PMCID: PMC6929360 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-019-1111-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Percent of households (n = 5714) with specific durable assets and utilities by wealth quintile
| Assets and utilities | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership of durable assets | ||||||
| Wristwatch | 16 | 18 | 21 | 26 | 27 | 22 |
| Gold | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 25 | 8 |
| Mobile phone | 20 | 42 | 58 | 77 | 89 | 57 |
| Radio | 15 | 20 | 30 | 44 | 47 | 31 |
| Bed | 13 | 41 | 66 | 76 | 84 | 56 |
| Housing characteristics and utilities | ||||||
| Electricity | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 73 | 18 |
| Kerosene lamp | 17 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 9 | 13 |
| Solar energy | 52 | 47 | 41 | 38 | 27 | 41 |
| Electricity for cooking | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 3 |
| Iron roof | 26 | 54 | 75 | 88 | 97 | 68 |
| Improved toilet facility | 43 | 72 | 81 | 89 | 94 | 76 |
| Improved source of water | 30 | 54 | 73 | 86 | 95 | 68 |
| Ownership of house, land, and livestock | ||||||
| Own house | 100 | 100 | 99 | 94 | 65 | 92 |
| Own agriculture land | 96 | 91 | 87 | 77 | 40 | 78 |
| Own livestock | 81 | 72 | 69 | 54 | 25 | 60 |
Wealth-based inequities in utilization of selected maternal and child health services
| Type of child health services | No of subjects | Overall utilization | Q1 utilization | Q5 utilization | Difference (Q5-Q1; % points) | Slope index of inequity /SII (% points) | Ratio (Q5: Q1) | Concentration index/CIX (X100) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | % | % | % | % | SE | value | % | SE | P | ||
| Maternal health services | ||||||||||||
| Antenatal care (4 or more visits) | 714 | 30 | 20 | 44 | 24 | 22.0 | 5.8 | < 0.001 | 2.2 | 13.2 | 3.3 | < 0.001 |
| Skilled birth attendance | 714 | 48 | 29 | 71 | 42 | 46.0 | 5.4 | < 0.001 | 2.5 | 17.5 | 2.1 | < 0.001 |
| Postnatal care (within two days) | 714 | 12 | 8 | 18 | 10 | 9.0 | 4.2 | 0 .042 | 2.2 | 14.1 | 6.0 | 0.020 |
| Child health services | ||||||||||||
| BCG immunization | 567 | 66 | 69 | 65 | −4 | −9.5 | 6.8 | 0.163 | 0.94 | −2.4 | 1.7 | 0.170 |
| Polio 3 immunization | 567 | 64 | 66 | 63 | −3 | −6.1 | 6.9 | 0.380 | 0.95 | −1.8 | 1.8 | 0.338 |
| Pentavalent 3 immunization | 567 | 54 | 56 | 57 | −1 | − 1.7 | 7.2 | 0.810 | 1.02 | −0.3 | 2.2 | 0.911 |
| Measles immunization | 567 | 61 | 60 | 57 | −3 | −7.0 | 7.2 | 0.326 | 0.95 | −2.1 | 1.9 | 0.286 |
| Full immunization | 567 | 41 | 42 | 44 | −2 | −5.0 | 7.2 | 0.488 | 1.05 | −1.8 | 3.0 | 0.548 |
| Vitamin A supplementation | 924 | 57 | 60 | 57 | −3 | − 5.1 | 5.6 | 0.361 | 0.95 | −0.7 | 1.6 | 0.662 |
Immunization coverage was computed for children aged 12–23 months and vitamin A supplementation for 6–23 months old. CIX- concentration index, SII-slope index of inequity. SE-standard error, Q1-wealth quintile 1 (20% poorest), Q5-wealth quintile 5 (20% better-off), 95%CI- 95% confidence interval. “Difference” (Q5-Q1) is a measure of an absolute difference in utilization of the services between the better-off (Q5) and poorest (Q1); “Ratio” is a measure of relative inequity of Q5 divided by Q1. The SII is an estimate of absolute inequity that takes the whole population into account and interpreted as the percentage point difference. The CIX is an estimate of relative inequity which takes the whole population into account. For all equity indices, the results are presented in percentages.
Fig. 2Percent utilization of maternal, neonatal, and child health services in each wealth quintiles Note: Colored dots show the mean coverage in each wealth quintile. Q1 represents the20% poorest wealth quintile and Q5 the 20% better-off. The distance between quintiles 1 and 5 represents absolute inequity. The horizontal lines connect the better-off (gold) and poorest (black) quintiles. The longer the line between the two groups, the greater the absolute inequity
Fig. 1Concentration curve for selected maternal and child health services by wealth quintiles