Literature DB >> 31869523

The prevalence of self-declared sensitive skin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

W Chen1, R Dai2, L Li3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sensitive skin is a common cutaneous condition that affects many people. The exact prevalence of sensitive skin remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES: We aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literatures to determine the global self-declared prevalence of sensitive skin.
METHODS: A systematic review of studies reporting the prevalence of sensitive skin was conducted searching electronic database of PubMed. Data were extracted and proportion meta-analyses were carried out to obtain the pooled prevalence.
RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included representing general population in 18 countries with 51 783 individuals. The pooled proportion of individuals with self-reported sensitive skin to some degrees was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) 62%-81%] in the general population and 40% (95% CI 32%-47%) among individuals having very or moderately sensitive skin. Sensitive skin affected both women (45%, 95% CI 36%-55%) and men (33%, 95% CI 24%-42%), and women tended to be a risk factor with the development of sensitive skin compared to men (Risk Ratio=1.741, 95% CI 1.38-2.20). The corresponding estimates for prevalence were 38% (95% CI 25%-51%) among America, 35% (95% CI 32%-37%) among South America, 44% (95% CI 39%-50%) among Europe, and 31% (95% CI 16%-45%) among Asia, respectively. The pooled proportion of self-diagnosed facial sensitive skin to some degree was 64% (95% CI 49%-76%). For subjects responded as having very or moderately facial sensitive skin, the pooled proportion was 34% (95% CI 21%-46%).
CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis based on published data showed that the global prevalence of self-declared sensitive skin to some degrees was 71% in the adult population, and 40% among individuals having very or moderately sensitive skin. However, the prevalence of sensitive skin was dependent on the diagnostic method and the prevalence might be over-estimated in the questionnaire-based epidemiological studies.
© 2019 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31869523     DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  4 in total

1.  Proposal for Cut-off Scores for Sensitive Skin on Sensitive Scale-10 in a Group of Adult Women.

Authors:  Cécile Legeas; Laurent Misery; Joachim W Fluhr; Alain-Claude Roudot; Anne-Sophie Ficheux; Emilie Brenaut
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Marine Ingredients for Sensitive Skin: Market Overview.

Authors:  Marta Salvador Ferreira; Diana I S P Resende; José M Sousa Lobo; Emília Sousa; Isabel F Almeida
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.118

3.  Questionnaire and Lactic Acid Sting Test Play Different Role on the Assessment of Sensitive Skin: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Yao Pan; Xue Ma; Yanqing Song; Jinfeng Zhao; Shiyu Yan
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-14

4.  Analysis of the Bacterial Flora of Sensitive Facial Skin Among Women in Guangzhou.

Authors:  Zhifen Qiao; Shiyi Huang; Fang Leng; Yu Bei; Yingzhi Chen; Minjie Chen; Yunfeng Hu; Yadong Huang; Qi Xiang
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-06-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.