OBJECTIVE: To identify the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in re-evaluating masses with inconsistent Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) on mammography (MG) and conventional ultrasound (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 637 breast lesions were evaluated with MG, US, and CEUS within 6 months and assessed as BI-RADS MG and US. CEUS was used as an additional screening to rerate BI-RADS US according to a five-point system. Lesions were divided into consistent or inconsistent group on the basis of BI-RADS MG and US assessment. The performance of MG, US, and CEUS in the overall and inconsistent group as well as the clinicopathological differences between consistent and inconsistent group were compared using Z test, Mann-Whitney U test, and t-test. RESULTS: The respective AUCs of MG and US were 0.742, 0.843 for overall group and 0.412, 0.789 for inconsistent group. The corresponding values of rerated CEUS BI-RADS were 0.958 and 0.950, which were significantly prior to those of MG and US (p < 0.001). Younger age, negative lymph node status, and dense breast were significantly associated with inconsistent group. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of CEUS to re-evaluate lesions can improve the diagnostic efficacy comparing to MG or US alone especially when disagreement occurred.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in re-evaluating masses with inconsistent Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) on mammography (MG) and conventional ultrasound (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 637 breast lesions were evaluated with MG, US, and CEUS within 6 months and assessed as BI-RADS MG and US. CEUS was used as an additional screening to rerate BI-RADS US according to a five-point system. Lesions were divided into consistent or inconsistent group on the basis of BI-RADS MG and US assessment. The performance of MG, US, and CEUS in the overall and inconsistent group as well as the clinicopathological differences between consistent and inconsistent group were compared using Z test, Mann-Whitney U test, and t-test. RESULTS: The respective AUCs of MG and US were 0.742, 0.843 for overall group and 0.412, 0.789 for inconsistent group. The corresponding values of rerated CEUS BI-RADS were 0.958 and 0.950, which were significantly prior to those of MG and US (p < 0.001). Younger age, negative lymph node status, and dense breast were significantly associated with inconsistent group. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of CEUS to re-evaluate lesions can improve the diagnostic efficacy comparing to MG or US alone especially when disagreement occurred.
Entities:
Keywords:
Contrast enhanced ultrasound; conventional ultrasound; inconsistent BI-RADS zzm321990MG and BI-RADS US assessment
Authors: Eva Janu; Lucie Krikavova; Jirina Little; Karel Dvorak; Dagmar Brancikova; Eva Jandakova; Tomas Pavlik; Petra Kovalcikova; Tomas Kazda; Vlastimil Valek Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 1.930