| Literature DB >> 31867999 |
Chu Chen1,2,3, Qing Tang4,3, Wenjuan Zhang2,3, Huijun Yuan1, Ying Huai2, Kai Jiang1, Yilun Wu1, Heping Zhao1.
Abstract
At present, there is no consistent understanding of the effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescription in the prevention of the deep vein thrombosis (DVT), though TCM has been widely used in China. To evaluate the efficacy of TCM prescription combined with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing DVT after major orthopedics surgery. All the retrieved articles were evaluated using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, data were extracted and evaluated for inclusion in a randomized controlled trial. In this study, variables included relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Overall, 16 articles were included with 1538 patients, 768 in the combination group (combination of TCM prescription and LMWH) and 770 in the LMWH group. The results indicated that in the combination group, the incidence of DVT (RR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.50, P < .00001) and d-dimer levels (standardized mean difference: -1.19, 95% CI: -1.80 to -0.58, P = .0001) was significantly lower than that in the LMWH group. Furthermore, the combination treatment obviously decreased the concentration of fibrinogen (MD: -1.19, 95% CI: -2.13 to -0.25, P = .01). The combination of TCM prescription and LMWH could significantly reduce the incidence of DVT, suggesting that it may be a more effective prophylaxis measure for DVT after major orthopedics surgery.Entities:
Keywords: deep vein thrombosis; low-molecular-weight heparin; meta-analysis; orthopedics major operation; traditional Chinese medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31867999 PMCID: PMC7027088 DOI: 10.1177/1076029619890411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ISSN: 1076-0296 Impact factor: 2.389
The Basic Characteristics of Included Studies.
| Study | Surgical Type | Combination Group | Control Group | Outcome Indicators | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Size | DVT | Preventive Measures | Sample Size | DVT | Preventive Measures | |||
| Li W (2017)[ | THA | 33 | 1 | On the basis of the control group, Huoxue Tongluo plaster | 36 | 3 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/PLT/D-D/DVT |
| Li X (2015)[ | HFS | 30 | 2 | On the basis of the control group, Huoxue Tongluo recipe | 30 | 8 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/D-D /FIB/DVT |
| Sun Z (2017)[ | THA | 30 | 0 | On the basis of the control group, Huoxue Lingfang compound | 30 | 0 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/TT /FIB/D-D/DVT |
| Feng J (2014)[ | HFS | 22 | 0 | On the basis of the control group, Danshen Chuanqiong soup | 21 | 2 | Low-molecular-weight heparin | D-D/DVT |
| Han H (2015)[ | HFS | 42 | 2 | On the basis of the control group, complex blood soup with peach and red soup. | 42 | 6 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/TT /FIB/D-D/DVT |
| Zheng J (2018)[ | HFS | 70 | 2 | On the basis of the control group, Huoxue Tongmai recipe | 70 | 9 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/FIB /D-D/DVT |
| Wang X (2017)[ | HFS | 68 | 2 | On the basis of the control group, Xiao Shuan soup | 68 | 9 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | DVT/D-D |
| Tu Z (2015)[ | THR | 48 | 2 | On the basis of the control group, traditional Chinese medicine | 52 | 9 | Low-molecular-weight heparin | APTT/PT/D-D/DVT |
| Chen G (2015)[ | THR | 56 | 7 | On the basis of the control group, Yiqi huoxue Tongmai soup | 56 | 15 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/DVT |
| Tan L (2013)[ | THR | 102 | 3 | On the basis of the control group, Danggui Huoxue liquid | 104 | 7 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/FIB /DVT/D-D |
| Sun Q (2011)[ | HFS | 31 | 2 | On the basis of the control group, Ginkgo Bilobate injection | 31 | 5 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | APTT/PT/PLT/DVT |
| Zheng H (2017)[ | HFS | 71 | 0 | On the basis of the control group | 75 | 2 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | DVT/D-D/PT |
| Lou H (2017)[ | HFS | 37 | 2 | On the basis of the control group, Yiqi Tongmai recipe | 36 | 5 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | DVT/APTT/PT /FIB/TT/D-D |
| Chen J (2017)[ | THA | 52 | 4 | On the basis of the control group, Huoxue Fuyuan soup | 60 | 9 | Low-molecular-weight heparin sodium | DVT/APTT/PT/FIB |
| Li C (2015)[ | TKA | 61 | 3 | On the basis of the control group, Yiqi Huoxue Tongluo soup | 55 | 9 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | DVT/APTT/PT/FIB |
| Zhang J (2014)[ | THA | 20 | 0 | On the basis of the control group, Honghua Huangsesu | 20 | 2 | Low-molecular-weight heparin calcium | DVT/APTT/PT /PLI |
Abbreviations: APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; D-D, d-dimer; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; FIB, fibrinogen; HFS, hip fractures surgery; PT, prothrombin time; THA, total hip arthroplasty; TKA, total knee arthroplasty; THR, Total Hip Replacement operation; PLT, Platelets; TT, thrombin time.
Figure 1.Flow diagram of the literature search and selection process.
The Comparison of APTT (s) Between 2 Groups.
| Study | Combination Group | Control Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APTT (BD) | n | APTT (AD) | APTT (BD) | n | APTT (AD) | |
| Li W (2017)[ | 28.93 ± 2.84 | 30 | 32.39 ± 4.27 | 27.79 ± 3.77 | 30 | 29.96 ± 4.48 |
| Li X (2015)[ | 21.99 ± 3.29 | 30 | 31.71 ± 5.76 | 21.09 ± 2.26 | 30 | 28.77 ± 4.51 |
| Sun Z (2017)[ | 22.39 ± 2.35 | 30 | 19.41 ± 2.34 | 22.13 ± 2.13 | 30 | 18.13 ± 2.27 |
| Han H (2015)[ | 39.27 ± 5.31 | 42 | 41.68 ± 5.42 | 40.05 ± 5.26 | 42 | 41.25 ± 5.39 |
| Zheng J (2018)[ | 36.90 ± 2.10 | 70 | 38.30 ± 2.10 | 36.60 ± 2.30 | 70 | 37.50 ± 3.10 |
| Tu Z (2015)[ | 31.82 ± 5.57 | 48 | 30.82 ± 5.69 | 32.41 ± 4.72 | 52 | 33.51 ± 5.42 |
| Chen G (2015)[ | 22.41 ± 2.62 | 56 | 34.57 ± 2.42 | 22.39 ± 2.58 | 56 | 31.18 ± 2.43 |
| Tan L (2013)[ | 24.30 ± 1.90 | 102 | 38.40 ± 5.80 | 23.60 ± 1.90 | 104 | 21.40 ± 3.20 |
| Sun Q (2011)[ | 30.48 ± 1.56 | 31 | 35.69 ± 5.96 | 32.56 ± 4.86 | 31 | 30.48 ± 1.56 |
| Lou H (2017)[ | 42.60 ± 3.20 | 37 | 31.30 ± 3.40 | 43.70 ± 4.00 | 36 | 35.50 ± 3.30 |
| Chen J (2017)[ | 30.57 ± 2.60 | 49 | 32.77 ± 2.58 | 30.33 ± 2.60 | 49 | 36.90 ± 2.45 |
| Li C (2015)[ | 35.80 ± 7.22 | 61 | 34.49 ± 6.43 | 35.69 ± 7.14 | 55 | 33.92 ± 6.05 |
| Zhang J (2014)[ | 28.16 ± 2.89 | 20 | 35.69 ± 5.96 | 29.48 ± 0.96 | 20 | 30.48 ± 1.56 |
Abbreviation: APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; BD, before drug; AD, after drug.
The Comparison of PT (s) Between 2 Groups.
| Study | Combination Group | Control Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT (BD) | n | PT (AD) | PT (BD) | n | PT (BD) | |
| Li W (2017)[ | 12.69 ± 0.61 | 30 | 12.71 ± 0.61 | 12.92 ± 0.76 | 30 | 12.14 ± 0.85 |
| Li X (2015)[ | 10.61 ± 1.87 | 30 | 12.99 ± 0.72 | 10.22 ± 1.64 | 30 | 12.07 ± 1.03 |
| Sun Z (2017)[ | 13.61 ± 1.43 | 30 | 10.72 ± 1.71 | 13.53 ± 1.58 | 30 | 9.79 ± 1.60 |
| Han H (2015)[ | 12.85 ± 2.32 | 42 | 14.67 ± 2.83 | 12.93 ± 2.57 | 42 | 13.28 ± 2.91 |
| Zheng J (2018)[ | 12.20 ± 2.10 | 70 | 14.30 ± 2.10 | 11.50 ± 2.10 | 70 | 13.50 ± 3.10 |
| Tu Z (2015)[ | 14.15 ± 1.32 | 48 | 14.04 ± 1.09 | 14.22 ± 1.29 | 52 | 14.73 ± 1.07 |
| Chen G (2015)[ | 10.57 ± 0.42 | 56 | 18.59 ± 0.33 | 10.58 ± 0.43 | 56 | 13.46 ± 0.31 |
| Tan L (2013)[ | 10.90 ± 1.20 | 102 | 17.00 ± 4.30 | 11.40 ± 1.10 | 104 | 10.40 ± 3.10 |
| Sun Q (2011)[ | 11.48 ± 2.26 | 31 | 12.48 ± 1.75 | 11.76 ± 0.96 | 31 | 10.56 ± 1.19 |
| Zheng H (2017)[ | 11.70 ± 2.21 | 69 | 11.80 ± 1.67 | 11.90 ± 1.34 | 70 | 11.80 ± 1.24 |
| Lou H (2017)[ | 17.50 ± 4.20 | 37 | 11.60 ± 3.00 | 18.20 ± 4.90 | 36 | 14.40 ± 3.00 |
| Chen J (2017)[ | 11.40 ± 1.37 | 49 | 10.50 ± 1.33 | 11.56 ± 1.58 | 49 | 13.73 ± 1.64 |
| Li C (2015)[ | 14.23 ± 1.89 | 61 | 14.01 ± 1.72 | 14.21 ± 1.86 | 55 | 13.88 ± 1.64 |
| Zhang J (2014)[ | 9.91 ± 4.46 | 20 | 16.63 ± 2.79 | 10.70 ± 0.63 | 20 | 13.40 ± 2.62 |
Abbreviation: PT, prothrombin time.
The Comparison of D-D (μg/L) Between 2 Groups.
| Study | Combination Group | Control Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D-D (BD | n | D-D (AD) | D-D (BD) | n | D-D (AD) | |
| Li W (2017)[ | 0.35 ± 0.10 | 30 | 0.98 ± 0.55 | 0.98 ± 0.55 | 30 | 1.16 ± 0.40 |
| Li X (2015)[ | 1.54 ± 1.00 | 30 | 0.99 ± 0.51 | 1.63 ± 0.77 | 30 | 1.20 ± 0.43 |
| Sun Z (2017)[ | 0.21 ± 0.16 | 30 | 0.42 ± 0.28 | 0.24 ± 0.17 | 30 | 0.53 ± 0.24 |
| Feng J (2014)[ | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 22 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | 21 | 0.52 ± 0.03 |
| Han H (2015)[ | 4.80 ± 0.99 | 42 | 0.20 ± 0.50 | 0.49 ± 0.99 | 42 | 3.40 ± 0.53 |
| Zheng J (2018)[ | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 70 | 0.63 ± 0.11 | 0.36 ± 0.17 | 70 | 0.74 ± 0.12 |
| Wang X (2017)[ | 8.97 ± 3.06 | 68 | 7.28 ± 3.83 | 8.65 ± 2.72 | 68 | 7.11 ± 4.33 |
| Tu Z (2015)[ | 0.17 ± 0.16 | 48 | 0.18 ± 0.09 | 0.18 ± 0.11 | 52 | 0.22 ± 0.08 |
| Tan L (2013)[ | 3.60 ± 0.10 | 102 | 1.60 ± 4.40 | 3.30 ± 0.40 | 104 | 9.40 ± 2.40 |
| Zheng H (2017)[ | 75.2 ± 5.67 | 69 | 73.6 ± 7.42 | 0.50 ± 0.20 | 70 | 75.20 ± 7.63 |
| Lou H (2017)[ | 1.60 ± 0.40 | 37 | 74.90 ± 8.21 | 1.70 ± 0.40 | 36 | 0.80 ± 0.30 |
| Chen J (2017)[ | 0.72 ± 0.26 | 49 | 0.40 ± 0.12 | 0.63 ± 0.30 | 49 | 0.87 ± 0.12 |
Abbreviation: D-D, d-dimer.
The Comparison of FIB (g/L) Between 2 Groups.
| Study | Combination Group | Control Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIB (BD) | n | FIB (AD) | FIB (BD) | n | FIB (AD) | |
| Li X (2015)[ | 3.99 ± 1.08 | 30 | 3.13 ± 0.54 | 3.72 ± 0.85 | 30 | 3.21 ± 0.72 |
| Sun Z (2017)[ | 3.41 ± 0.68 | 30 | 3.12 ± 1.21 | 3.53 ± 0.71 | 30 | 3.95 ± 0.94 |
| Han H (2015)[ | 5.15 ± 1.81 | 42 | 3.82 ± 1.42 | 5.18 ± 1.76 | 42 | 4.16 ± 1.50 |
| Zheng J (2018)[ | 3.40 ± 0.30 | 70 | 4.20 ± 2.20 | 3.30 ± 0.70 | 70 | 5.50 ± 2.10 |
| Tan L (2013)[ | 4.80 ± 0.70 | 102 | 3.80 ± 4.20 | 4.20 ± 0.40 | 104 | 10.30 ± 2.60 |
| Lou H (2017)[ | 2.40 ± 0.50 | 37 | 3.60 ± 0.30 | 2.40 ± 0.50 | 36 | 3.20 ± 0.40 |
| Chen J (2017)[ | 3.09 ± 0.23 | 49 | 3.39 ± 0.56 | 3.10 ± 0.36 | 49 | 4.92 ± 0.44 |
| Li C (2015)[ | 4.94 ± 1.2 | 61 | 4.44 ± 1.02 | 4.91 ± 1.30 | 55 | 4.72 ± 1.15 |
Abbreviation: FIB, fibrinogen.
Figure 2.Forest plot that shows the comparison of the incidence of DVT between the combination group and the control group.
Figure 3.Funnel plot that shows the comparison of the incidence of DVT.
Figure 4.Forest plot that shows the comparison of the D-D between the combination group and the control group.
Figure 5.Forest plot that shows the comparison of the FIB between the combination group and the control group.
Figure 6.Forest plot that shows the comparison of the APTT between the combination group and the control group.
Figure 7.Forest plot that shows the comparison of the PT between the combination group and the control group.