| Literature DB >> 31867790 |
Yilong Wang1,2,3, Xiaohu An1,2,3, Xiaoqing Zhang4, Jianhui Liu4, Jianwei Wang1,2,3, Zeyong Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is a common complication in elderly patients after surgeries involving anesthesia, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Lithium is a conventional treatment for bipolar disorder, which exerts a neuroprotective role in various diseases by inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) in the brain and spinal cord. However, it is not known whether lithium chloride (LiCl) can protect against cognitive dysfunction induced by sevoflurane (SEV) anesthesia. Here, we examined the effects of LiCl on SEV-induced cognitive dysfunction in rats and on SEV-induced neuron apoptosis. We report that anesthesia with SEV significantly impaired memory performance, induced oxidative stress and hippocampal neuron apoptosis, and stimulated GSK-3β activity. Treatment with LiCl ameliorated SEV-induced cognitive disorder in rats by inhibiting the GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway. In addition, LiCl reduced hippocampal neuron apoptosis and oxidative stress induced by SEV anesthesia. These results suggest that LiCl may have potential for development into a therapeutic agent for treatment of SEV anesthesia-induced cognitive dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: anesthesia; apoptosis; cognitive deficits; glycogen synthase kinase-3β; lithium chloride; sevoflurane
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31867790 PMCID: PMC6996326 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12779
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.792
Figure 1LiCl improves SEV‐induced memory impairment in rats. (A) Experimental time course. (B, C) After removing the platform on the sixth day, we counted the number of platform crossings (B) and the time spent in the target quadrant (C) within 90 s in the MWM test. (D) The latency for rat to enter a target hole in the training courses on the fifth day in BM test. (E) The percent of time spent in the target in the BM test. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; n = 12; one‐way ANOVA, F (2, 33) = 58.72; *P < 0.05 compared with control group; # P < 0.05 compared with SEV group.
Figure 2LiCl inhibits oxidative stress induced by SEV in rat hippocampus. (A) Quantification data of ROS level in the hippocampus. (B) SOD1 activity was determined by SOD1 activity colorimetric assay kit. (C) CAT activity was determined by CAT‐specific activity assay kit. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; n = 8; one‐way ANOVA, F(2, 21) = 48.92; **P < 0.01 versus control group; # P < 0.05 versus SEV group.
Figure 3LiCl reduces apoptosis induced by SEV in rat hippocampus. (A) In each group, photomicrographs presenting TUNEL‐positive cells in rat hippocampus. (B) A chart for TUNEL‐positive cells/total number of cells ratio in different groups, and five aspects were viewed in every rat. Scale bar: 40 μm. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; n = 3; one‐way ANOVA, F (2, 6) = 55.24; **P < 0.01 compared with control group; # P < 0.05 compared with SEV group.
Figure 4LiCl decreases SEV‐induced apoptosis‐rated proteins expression in rat hippocampus. (A–D) Immunoblots (A) and quantitative measurement of Bcl2 (B), BAX (C) and cleaved caspase‐3 (D) in rat hippocampus. Data are demonstrated as mean ± SEM; n = 3; one‐way ANOVA, F (2, 6) = 19.27; **P < 0.01 compared with control group; # P < 0.05 compared with SEV group.
Figure 5LiCl inhibits the activation of GSK‐3β/β‐catenin signal pathway in rat hippocampus. (A–D) Western blots results (A) and quantitative measurement of GSK‐3β (B), β‐catenin (C) and JNK (D) in rat hippocampus. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; n = 3; one‐way ANOVA, F (2, 6) = 31.33; **P < 0.01 compared with control group; # P < 0.05 compared with SEV group.