| Literature DB >> 31867546 |
Hongzhi Lu1, Chenchen Li2, Huihui Wang1, Xiaomeng Wang1, Shoufang Xu1.
Abstract
A method for green synthesis of sulfur,Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31867546 PMCID: PMC6921638 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Scheme 1Schematic Representation of S,N/CDs Preparation and Fluorescence Sensing of Ag+ in Water and Living Cells
Figure 1TEM images (A), particle size distribution (B), XRD pattern (C), and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra (D) of prepared S,N/CDs. Inset are the HRTEM images of S,N/CDs.
Figure 2(A) XPS spectra of the S,N/CDs and the higher solution peaks for C 1s (B), N 1s (C), and S 2p (D).
Figure 3(A) UV–vis absorption, photoluminescence excitation, and excitation-dependent emission spectra of the S,N/CDs in an aqueous solution; (B) FL intensity response (F/F0) of S,N/CDs toward various metal ions (Ag+, 50 μM; Na+ and K+, 1 mM; Co2+, Zn2+, Cr3+, Cd2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Al3+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Pb2+, Hg2+, and Cu2+, 500 μM).
Figure 4FL emission spectra of the S,N/CDs upon the addition of various concentrations of Ag+ from 0 to 50 μM (A); relationship between F0/F and the concentration of Ag+, where F0 and F are FL intensities of the S,N/CDs at 430 nm in the absence and presence of Ag+, respectively (B); and FL intensity response (F/F0) of S,N/CDs toward various metal ions (500 μM) and the subsequent addition of 20 μM Ag+ (aFe3+: 500 μM Fe3+; bFe3+: 500 μM Fe3+ + 1 mM ascorbic acid) (C). Lifetime data of S,N/CDs with Ag+ (λex = 350 nm; λem = 430 nm) (D); UV–vis absorption of S,N/CDs with different concentrations of Ag+ (inset are the images of S,N/CDs solution with different concentrations of Ag+ under sunlight) (E); and relationship between A450/A270 and the concentration of Ag+, where A450 and A270 are the absorbances of S,N/CDs at 450 and 270 nm; the inset picture is the S,N/CDs solution with different concentrations of Ag+ under sunlight (F).
Recoveries and RSDs for Detection of Ag+ in Spiked Samples by S,N/CDs Fluorescence Systems and AAS (n = 3)
| found
(μM) | recovery (%) + RSD (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | added (μM) | S,N/CDs | AAS | S,N-CDs | AAS |
| river water | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 98.0 ± 2.9 | 98.0 ± 4.3 |
| 1.00 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 102.0 ± 3.1 | 99.0 ± 4.2 | |
| 10.00 | 9.86 | 9.82 | 98.6 ± 3.7 | 98.2 ± 2.4 | |
| tap water | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 96.0 ± 3.5 | 104 ± 3.0 |
| 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 96.0 ± 4.1 | 102 ± 4.8 | |
| 10.00 | 9.91 | 9.86 | 99.1 ± 3.9 | 98.6 ± 4.3 | |
Figure 5Cellular cytotoxicity of the S,N/CDs.
Figure 6Confocal laser fluorescence microscope (CLFM) images of 4T1 cells. The scale bar is 20 μm. A1 is labeled with 200 μg mL–1 S,N/CDs (405 nm excitation) and B1 is stained with LysoTracker Deep Red (635 nm excitation). A2 is labeled with 200 μg mL–1 S,N/CDs only and A3–A4 are labeled with 200 μg mL–1 S,N/CDs combined with 1 and 10 μM Ag+, respectively. B2–B4 are stained by Cell Mask Orange plasma membrane stain and with an excitation wavelength at 561 nm. C1–C4 are bright field images. D1–D4 are overlay images.