Yibo Bai1, Mengmeng Shang2, Mengya Xu1, Anyi Wu1, Luning Sun3, Lanyan Zheng1. 1. Department of Pathogen Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China. 2. Department of Scientific Research, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (East), Beijing, China. 3. Department of Pathophysiology, College of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Abstract
Catabolic control protein (CcpA) is linked to complex carbohydrate utilization and virulence factor in many bacteria species, influences the transcription of target genes by many mechanisms. To characterize the activity and regulatory mechanisms of CcpA in Streptococcus sanguinis, here, we analyzed the transcriptome of Streptococcus sanguinis SK36 and its CcpA-null derivative (ΔCcpA) using RNA-seq. Compared to the regulon of CcpA in SK36 in the RegPrecise database, we found that only minority of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) contained putative catabolite response element (cre) in their regulatory regions, indicating that many genes could have been affected indirectly by the loss of CcpA and analyzing the sequence of the promoter region using prediction tools is not a desirable method to recognize potential target genes of global regulator CcpA. Gene ontology and pathway analysis of DEGs revealed that CcpA exerts an influence predominantly involved in carbon catabolite metabolism and some amino acid catabolite pathways, which has been linked to expression of virulence genes in many pathogens and coordinately regulate the disease progression in vivo studies. However, in some scenarios, differences observed at the transcript level could not reflect the real differences at the protein level. Therefore, to confirm the differences in phenotype and virulence of SK36 and ΔCcpA, we characterized the role of CcpA in the regulation of biofilm development, EPS production and the virulence of Streptococcus sanguinis. Results showed CcpA inactivation impaired biofilm and EPS formation, and CcpA also involved in virulence in rabbit infective endocarditis model. These findings will undoubtedly contribute to investigate the mechanistic links between the global regulator CcpA and the virulence of Streptococcus sanguinis, further broaden our understanding of the relationship between basic metabolic processes and virulence.
Catabolic control protein (CcpA) is linked to complex carbohydrate utilization and virulence factor in many bacteria species, influences the transcription of target genes by many mechanisms. To characterize the activity and regulatory mechanisms of CcpA in Streptococcus sanguinis, here, we analyzed the transcriptome of Streptococcus sanguinisSK36 and its CcpA-null derivative (ΔCcpA) using RNA-seq. Compared to the regulon of CcpA in SK36 in the RegPrecise database, we found that only minority of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) contained putative catabolite response element (cre) in their regulatory regions, indicating that many genes could have been affected indirectly by the loss of CcpA and analyzing the sequence of the promoter region using prediction tools is not a desirable method to recognize potential target genes of global regulator CcpA. Gene ontology and pathway analysis of DEGs revealed that CcpA exerts an influence predominantly involved in carbon catabolite metabolism and some amino acid catabolite pathways, which has been linked to expression of virulence genes in many pathogens and coordinately regulate the disease progression in vivo studies. However, in some scenarios, differences observed at the transcript level could not reflect the real differences at the protein level. Therefore, to confirm the differences in phenotype and virulence of SK36 and ΔCcpA, we characterized the role of CcpA in the regulation of biofilm development, EPS production and the virulence of Streptococcus sanguinis. Results showed CcpA inactivation impaired biofilm and EPS formation, and CcpA also involved in virulence in rabbit infective endocarditis model. These findings will undoubtedly contribute to investigate the mechanistic links between the global regulator CcpA and the virulence of Streptococcus sanguinis, further broaden our understanding of the relationship between basic metabolic processes and virulence.
Infective endocarditis (IE) caused by microorganisms has long been regarded as dependent upon biofilms (Costerton et al., 1999; Douglas, 2003; Parsek and Singh, 2003; Xu et al., 2003). Streptococcus sanguinis was recognized as one of the most common causes of endocarditis, alongside Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus bovis (Vogkou et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2018). It was well-known that biofilm formation is tightly interconnected with EPS production and the degree of exposure of S. sanguinis surface adhesion molecules for the initial colonization (Flemming and Wingender, 2010). Although various factors related to the virulence of S. sanguinis have been identified, the regulatory mechanisms of colonization and biofilm development are still elusive.Catabolic control protein (CcpA) is linked to complex carbohydrate utilization and virulence factor production in many bacteria species in response to changes in overall energy levels and amount of carbohydrate as the global regulator of carbon catabolite repression (CCR) (Abranches et al., 2008; Willenborg et al., 2014). For example, CcpA has been reported to influence the expression of diverse virulence factors of S. aureus, Streptococcus mutans, and Enterococcus faecium in response to various kinds and concentrations of carbohydrate (Somarajan et al., 2014; Bischoff et al., 2017; Bauer et al., 2018). In Streptococcus suis, CcpA was found to be indispensable for capsule production in glucose-affluent conditions and virulence-associated gene expression (Willenborg et al., 2011). In Streptococcus pneumoniae, capsule expression was also regulated by RegM/CcpA (Giammarinaro and Paton, 2002). Earlier studies have shown that glucan-producing S. sanguinis was found to be more difficultly cleaned from the circulation than glucan-negative mutants (Parker and Ball, 1976; Ramirez-Ronda, 1978). Pioneering work by Bin Zhu and his coworkers reported that insoluble glucan is the major component of S. sanguinis biofilms (Zhu et al., 2017). Skov Sorensen and his coworkers demonstrated that these polysaccharides are similar to S. pneumoniacapsular polysaccharide (CPS) in genetic and antigenic aspect, even they are the equivalent of capsular polysaccharides of pneumococci (Skov Sorensen et al., 2016). Considering that CcpA is widely conserved, and the overall CPS structural similarity that exists between viridans group suggests a common biosynthetic pathway for these molecules (Xu et al., 2003; Yang et al., 2009; Skov Sorensen et al., 2016), which prompted us to characterize the role CcpA plays in the biofilm development, EPS production and virulence of S. sanguinis and further to identify potential targets of global regulator CcpA regulated that contribute to cause IE.It is well-known that CcpA exerts its regulatory role by binding to a typical consensus site called catabolite response element (cre) in the promotor regions (Weickert and Chambliss, 1990). Recently, a novel mode of regulation of the S. aureusCcpA mediated by Stk1 protein phosphorylation was found (Leiba et al., 2012), and the study by Chen et al. (2019) reported that the pilin genes cluster of S. sanguinisSK36 occurred in a CcpA-dependent manner, although a typical cre is absent in the target region (SSA_2318). Furthermore, some researchers have reported the distinct regulatory role of CcpA in S. sanguinis, may involve in the key metabolic pathways through specific metabolic product (Redanz et al., 2018). All these suggested that there may be other unknown regulation model exists. Consequently, analyzing the sequence of the promoter region using the prediction tools is not a desirable method to recognize the CcpA regulated target genes.In this study, we analyzed the whole transcriptome of wild-type S. sanguinisSK36 and its CcpA-null derivative (ΔCcpA) using high throughput sequencing technologies (RNA-seq). We not only revealed the potential target genes of CcpA in S. sanguinis and showed that some amino acid catabolic pathways are regulated by CcpA in S. sanguinis, we also characterize the role of CcpA in the regulation of EPS production, biofilm formation and the virulence of S. sanguinis. We found that CcpA inactivation impaired EPS production and biofilm formation in vitro, and CcpA also involved in virulence in a rabbit IE model. These findings will undoubtedly contribute to investigate the mechanistic links between the global regulator CcpA and the virulence of S. sanguinis, further broaden our understanding of the relationship between basic metabolic processes and virulence.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions
S. sanguinis strains were obtained from Zheng et al. (2011), including SK36, the CcpA mutant (ΔCcpA), and the complement of the ΔCcpA (CcpA+). We grew strains as static cultures at 37°C in brain heart infusion (BHI; Difco, Sparks, MD) or on BHI agar plates in an anaerobic chamber (90% N2, 5% CO2, 5% H2). All the strains grew well and reached the same plateau though CcpA mutant showed a decreased growth. So, we collected the cells at the mid-exponential phase (A 600 = 0.5).When required for selection, antibiotics were added to the medium as follows: spectinomycin at 500 μg/ml and erythromycin at 2 μg/ml for S. sanguinis.
RNA Isolation and Sequencing
RNA was isolated using the KANGWEI Ultrapure RNA Kit (CWBIO, China) and the isolated RNA was subjected to DNase I (Promega, Beijing, China) treatment and purified with the TIANGEN RNAclean kit (TIANGEN, China). The clean RNA samples were aliquoted into two tubes and frozed at −80°C for further RT-PCR or RNA-Seq processing. The Ribo-Zero TM Magnetic Kit (Gram-Positive Bacteria) was used to remove ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and enrich the mRNA to compensate for the low-input samples. The average RNA Integrity number (RIN) was 8, and the average RNA yield was 100 ng/μl. The library preparation, sequencing, and initial quality check were performed by Berry Genomics Corporation, Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, China (http://www.berrygenomics.com/tech-services/illumina). Samples were then sequenced using the Illumina HiseqTM 2500 Next Generation Sequencer at Berry Genomics Corporation, China. Three independent experiments of each group were performed and sequenced. The resulting sequences were then aligned to the reference genome of strain SK36 (GenBank Accession: NC_009009) in order to create a transcriptome map using EDGE-pro. Gene quantification was calculated by the reads per kilobase per million mapped reads method (RPKM), using RSEM (V1.2.15) software.
Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) Analysis
Differences in gene expression profiles were performed using EdgeR statistics including a Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Each group had three biological replicates. False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05 and |log2RPKM ratios (ΔCcpA/WT)|>1 were taken as the thresholds to ascertain the significance of differences in gene expression. To further investigate the DEGs, these DEGs were clustered and presented as heat maps.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)
SSA-1575, SSA-2379, SSA-0016, and SSA-0391, randomly selected DEGs, were performed qRT-PCR to validate the results of RNA-seq. cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg of RNA using the SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) followed the manufacturer's recommendation. The primer sequences are listed in Table 1. The gyrA gene was used as reference gene for calculation of the relative target gene expression using the 2−ΔΔCt method. All qPCR results are presented as ratios of the ΔCcpA/wild type levels relative to gyrA transcripts. The experiments were repeated three times independently, and three replicates were involved in each sample. Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism (version 5.0) software using Student's t-test (P-value below 0.05 was considered statistical significance).
Table 1
List of the primer sequences used in qPCR analysis.
Gene
Forward primer (5′-3′)
Reverse primer (5′-3′)
gyrA
GCCGTGAGCGAATTGTCGTAAC
CGAACAGCAGTGATACCGTCAATG
Com C
TGAAAATCTATTCTTTTCAAATTGC
CAATCCCATGGATTTGGAAT
Com D
GCGTTTGCG TCAAAAAGAAT
ACAACTTGATTGGAAGGCGTTC
Com X
CAAGAAAGCCAAAAGCGAAA
TCGCTTCTCTGAAGGCAACT
SpxB
AATTCGGCGGCTCAATCG
AAGGATAGCAAGGAATGGAGTG
List of the primer sequences used in qPCR analysis.
Gene Ontology (GO) and Pathway Analysis
To characterize the GO terms, including molecular functions, biological processes, cellular components, and functional pathways of DEGs, significantly enriched GO terms was analyzed by a hypergeometric test, based on “GO Term Finder” (Boyle et al., 2004; Lang et al., 2015). All the DEGs were mapped to the terms in KO (KEGG Orthology) identifier (Kanehisa et al., 2012; Zeng et al., 2013) using KOBAS 2.0 to identify which pathways the significant DEGs belonged to.
Biofilm Development and Quantification
Biofilm formation was measured as reported previously (Zheng et al., 2012), however, some procedures were modified. Briefly, SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+ overnight grown cultures were diluted 1:60 in fresh BHI media supplemented with 0.2% sucrose and inoculated into microtiter plates(96-well cell culture plates; Thermo Fisher scientific), then anaerobically grown as static cultures for 48 h at 37°C to form biofilms. After removing the residual medium and air-drying the microtiter dish, the residual cells were resuspended in the well with 90% ethanol and then transferred to a new-flat bottomed microtiter dish with 100 mL of ethanol where it was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader. Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism (version 5.0) software. Statistical significance was indicated when the P-value was below 0.05.
Detection of EPS-Producing Phenotype of the Strains by the Congo Red Agar (CRA) Plate Test
CRA was prepared by adding 0.8 g of Congo red and 50 g of sucrose to 1 L of brain heart infusion agar as described previously (Mathur et al., 2006; Zheng et al., 2012). SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+ overnight cultures grown in BHI medium were streaked on CRA plates and anaerobically cultured for 21 h. Then, plates were scanned with an HP scanner or photographed with a digital camera. The interaction of the direct dye Congo red with intact β-D-glucans (one molecule of Congo red is bound to six D-glucose residues of the D-glucan chain) provides the basis for a rapid and sensitive assay system for detection of EPS production of bacteria (Ogawa and Hatano, 1978).
Rabbit Model of IE
In this study, to study the role of global regulator CcpA in the virulence of S. sanguinis, we used the rabbit endocarditis model. The experiment was performed using a modification of transaortic catheterization models of endocarditis as previously described (Fan et al., 2012) and was reviewed and approved by the IACUC of the China Medical University Laboratory Animal Center. Adult Rex rabbits (2–3 kg; obtained from China Medical University Laboratory Animal Center) were used. Twenty-four hours after the positioning of the catheter, a total of 44 rabbits were assigned randomly to the following treatment groups: A, SK36 (n = 12); B, ΔCcpA (n = 12); C, CcpA+(n = 12); D, control (n = 8). Viable S. sanguinis (~109 CFU) or PBS was injected intravenously via the marginal ear vein. SK36, ΔCcpA, or CcpA+ strains were collected at cell densities (A600 = 0.63) and then washed and resuspended with PBS to the desired cell density as inoculated organisms. Twenty-four hours after injection, 200 μl of arterial blood was extracted from the ear of each animal to be quantitatively cultured in duplicate on BHI plates to determine the number of bacteria present in the blood. Three days after injection, the animals were euthanized. At autopsy, the proper positioning of the catheter was verified. Vegetations were excised, weighed, and homogenized in PBS before being quantitatively cultured in duplicate on BHI plates after serial dilutions in BHI broth. After 24 h incubation at 37°C, the colonies growing on BHI plates were expressed as log10 CFU. Bacterial load from vegetations was expressed by its mean value standard error (SE), and comparisons between groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The correlation between CFU and vegetation mass were assessed using Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
Results
Reads Obtaining and Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) Analysis
In this report, we characterized the transcriptional profile of ΔCcpA mutant by analyzing the RNA-Seq data. After performing quality control, we obtained an average of over 20 million clean reads from each group (n = 3). The first group (ΔCcpA) was composed of 7.4, 6.8, and 7.0 million reads and the second group (SK36 WT) contained 7.1, 6.9, and 7.5 million reads. Overall, 76–82% of reads were mapped to the SK36 genome by using EDGE-pro. The saturation curves showed that the sequencing became saturated and the gene coverage indicated adequate sequencing depth (Figures S1–S3 in Supplementary File 1). Data were deposited with the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at the National Center for Biotechnology Institute (accession PRJNA564466). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis using EdgeR statistics revealed that the deletion of CcpA in S. sanguinis significantly down-regulated 85 unigenes expression and up-regulated 84 unigenes expression of identified 897 unigenes (Supplementary File 2) compared to wild type SK36 (Table 2), according to the standard of a significant difference in expression levels. When compared the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to the regulon of CcpA in S. sanguinisSK36 in the RegPrecise database (http://regprecise.lbl.gov, a web resource for collection, visualization and analysis of transcriptional regulons reconstructed by comparative genomics, Supplementary File 3), as a result, 29 of the 84 up-regulated DEGs, and 5 of the 85 down-regulation of DEGs were in the list of the regulon of CcpA (Table 2). To further investigate the nature of the DEGs, we performed Hierarchical clustering analysis and heatmap of the 173 DEGs with the smallest q-values using a Pearson correlation distance metric. The triplicates were analyzed in each group (Figure 1A).
Table 2
The DEGs of ΔCcpA mutant.
Gene
Locus tag
FPKM(ctrl)
FPKM(case)
log2FoldChange
FDR
(1) Up-regulated DEGs
c185_g93
SSA_0778
32.64
2,011.40
5.79
0.00000
c43_g1
SSA_2020a
7.32
460.67
6.02
0.00000
c185_g109b,m
SSA_0779a
132.91
1,892.65
3.49
0.00000
c185_g52b,m
SSA_0776a
17.59
1,037.19
5.70
0.00000
c184_g184b,c,m
SSA_1615a
270.81
4,128.01
4.03
0.00000
c157_g1b,c,m
SSA_1588
21.48
142.36
2.52
0.00000
c184_g183
SSA_0393
79.26
764.76
2.85
0.00000
c246_g1b,c,m
SSA_1298a
487.48
4,096.15
2.99
0.00000
c184_g141b,c,m
SSA_1749a
448.60
2,713.78
2.43
0.00000
c185_g218b,m
SSA_0631
60.92
367.74
2.31
0.00000
c71_g1
SSA_1063
18.64
121.58
2.29
0.00000
c184_g82b,c,m
SSA_1918a
1,391.90
7,543.70
2.24
0.00000
c185_g62b,c,m
SSA_1259a
158.49
817.17
2.09
0.00000
c184_g294b,c,m
SSA_0391a
2,312.95
14,153.22
2.34
0.00000
c184_g18b,c,m
SSA_0300
67.70
371.66
2.21
0.00000
c183_g84b,c
SSA_1949a
132.20
609.00
2.11
0.00000
c183_g30m
SSA_0509
52.34
358.25
2.40
0.00000
c184_g19b,m
SSA_0572a
72.24
442.42
2.49
0.00000
c185_g150b,m
SSA_1261a
70.60
393.52
2.42
0.00000
c449_g1b,m
SSA_2078
69.32
291.42
1.77
0.00000
c185_g56
SSA_2352
20.18
246.58
3.06
0.00000
c185_g235b,m
SSA_1035
57.53
273.58
1.95
0.00000
c184_g71b,m
SSA_0077a
21.92
133.45
2.25
0.00000
c183_g25
SSA_0508
69.03
302.99
1.91
0.00000
c185_g234
SSA_1252
22.55
132.42
2.21
0.00000
c185_g254b,c,m
SSA_0192a
480.54
1,520.49
1.46
0.00000
c534_g1b,m
SSA_2083
1.19
10.18
2.52
0.00000
c185_g1b,c,m
SSA_1256
62.52
312.53
2.23
0.00000
c183_g13
SSA_1207
164.69
548.76
1.37
0.00000
c185_g28
SSA_1251
17.41
105.04
2.32
0.00000
c183_g77b,c,m
SSA_0342
2,740.47
9,026.47
1.69
0.00000
c184_g292b,c
SSA_0076a
29.15
148.31
1.92
0.00000
c184_g132c
SSA_0075a
25.22
154.85
2.10
0.00000
c185_g3b,c,m
SSA_1034
90.45
261.42
1.38
0.00000
c241_g1b,c,m
SSA_0068a
94.25
281.24
1.21
0.00001
c186_g1m
SSA_1012
330.19
900.52
1.16
0.00001
c386_g1b,c,m
SSA_1009a
51.41
151.27
1.28
0.00001
c154_g1b,c,m
SSA_0453a
98.37
273.16
1.17
0.00001
c184_g259
SSA_1750
29.82
99.50
1.59
0.00001
c184_g324c
SSA_1098a
196.99
699.14
1.69
0.00002
c184_g290b,c,m
SSA_0836
85.66
253.80
1.21
0.00002
c185_g121b,m
SSA_0637
43.18
200.86
1.63
0.00003
c184_g170b,c,m
SSA_0072a
32.86
179.23
1.71
0.00003
c185_g32b,c,m
SSA_1574
138.44
376.16
1.15
0.00004
c276_g1b,c,m
SSA_2084
1.56
9.42
2.72
0.00006
c184_g238
SSA_0607
53.38
181.86
1.75
0.00007
c184_g130
SSA_0394
629.76
1552.53
1.12
0.00009
c184_g185b,c
SSA_0833
61.53
173.14
1.20
0.00010
c184_g156b,c,m
SSA_1809a
504.45
1,583.03
1.28
0.00022
c185_g153b,c,m
SSA_1039
375.93
842.09
1.07
0.00023
c183_g35b,m
SSA_0512
101.31
296.07
1.05
0.00027
c184_g9b,m
SSA_2017
31.59
126.87
1.53
0.00028
c184_g102m
SSA_0831
44.88
122.92
1.20
0.00033
c184_g310b,c,m
SSA_0091
81.21
261.34
1.27
0.00035
c184_g3b,c,m
SSA_0834
51.54
146.79
1.14
0.00037
c185_g148c,m
SSA_2066
64.52
174.51
1.14
0.00037
c60_g1m
SSA_2106
3.00
15.43
2.04
0.00046
c184_g125b,c,m
SSA_0127
73.10
191.76
1.13
0.00054
c184_g248b,c,m
SSA_1752a
828.77
2,044.10
1.05
0.00073
c184_g281b,c,m
SSA_1913
11.03
75.75
2.43
0.00112
c192_g1b,c,m
SSA_0297
31.96
98.24
1.60
0.00124
c183_g53b,c,m
SSA_2175
16.52
52.95
1.31
0.00138
c185_g127b,m
SSA_0638
37.89
135.65
1.34
0.00144
c185_g242b,m
SSA_1575
150.63
397.53
1.27
0.00177
c183_g96b,c,m
SSA_0980
21.52
85.59
1.29
0.00293
c184_g57m
SSA_1053
28.13
84.64
1.40
0.00344
c184_g139
SSA_1746
473.11
1,073.63
1.00
0.00351
c184_g63b,c,m
SSA_1917a
27.34
82.31
1.08
0.00365
c185_g187b,c,m
SSA_0644
5,202.87
13,437.05
1.40
0.00384
c184_g89b,m
SSA_0090
88.75
240.77
1.01
0.00393
c183_g47b,c,m
SSA_2167
44.53
112.60
1.01
0.00551
c183_g108c,m
SSA_0318
22.74
75.52
1.03
0.00557
c134_g2b,c,m
SSA_1003a
1.83
5.63
1.10
0.00564
c314_g1b,m
SSA_2096
3.00
16.95
2.59
0.00568
c183_g45b,c,m
SSA_0502
32.48
78.56
1.02
0.00650
c185_g230
SSA_2060
33.36
101.01
1.27
0.00765
c183_g90b,c,m
SSA_0500
36.50
107.52
1.10
0.00768
c184_g5b,c,m
SSA_2230
43.68
123.43
1.03
0.00780
c184_g168
SSA_2018
25.70
75.28
1.21
0.00962
c185_g136
SSA_1614
69.83
152.95
1.00
0.01933
c183_g41
SSA_2177
14.39
37.66
1.34
0.02387
c185_g161
SSA_0667
10.25
27.86
1.33
0.03003
c525_g1b,c,m
SSA_1008a
31.73
70.29
1.17
0.03449
c185_g144b
SSA_1306
47.73
125.80
1.02
0.04701
(2) Down-regulated DEGs
c185_g162b
SSA_1576a
2,355.32
72.38
−5.27
0.00000
c182_g16
SSA_1889
1,449.35
52.64
−4.97
0.00000
c183_G109b,c
SSA_1950
2,214.11
206.75
−3.36
0.00000
c185_G146b,c
SSA_0650a
1,238.80
394.95
−1.96
0.00000
c184_g210
SSA_0094
1,330.37
327.41
−2.23
0.00000
c184_G204b,c
SSA_0760
74.75
6.52
−3.50
0.00000
c184_g309
SSA_1052
1,412.90
243.16
−2.55
0.00000
c184_G315b,c,m
SSA_0757
44.03
4.06
−3.35
0.00000
c184_G202b,c,m
SSA_0758
56.88
5.36
−3.40
0.00000
c185_g54c
SSA_1398
1,209.44
383.14
−2.00
0.00000
c28_g1c
SSA_2094
11,083.50
2,829.00
−2.22
0.00000
c184_g303c
SSA_0684
2,379.11
731.09
−1.82
0.00000
c183_g63b,c
SSA_2151
914.26
320.17
−1.63
0.00000
c185_g76b,c
SSA_0886a
21,601.58
4,635.68
−2.24
0.00000
c242_g1b,c,m
SSA_1567
495.17
111.10
−2.08
0.00000
c184_g60b,c
SSA_0687
1,880.60
618.04
−1.67
0.00000
c183_g121
SSA_0918
1,791.45
708.64
−1.61
0.00000
c307_g1
SSA_2379
375.43
153.25
−1.68
0.00000
c185_g39
SSA_2364
2,107.33
1,058.92
−1.35
0.00000
c185_g185
SSA_2371
215.79
93.91
−1.52
0.00001
c184_g230b,c
SSA_0759
35.82
2.48
−3.58
0.00001
c184_g222
SSA_2242
522.98
169.18
−1.70
0.00001
c185_g110b,c
SSA_0860
2,286.06
878.21
−1.48
0.00001
c185_g14
SSA_0848a
3,980.18
1,824.31
−1.29
0.00002
c185_g95
SSA_0195
93.96
32.03
−2.09
0.00002
c185_g65b,c,m
SSA_0753
3,079.98
1,410.53
−1.36
0.00002
c185_g189b,c
SSA_1265
20,414.68
8,368.19
−1.37
0.00003
c185_g259
SSA_0193
167.85
60.49
−1.76
0.00004
c185_g238
SSA_0682
3,591.24
1,442.97
−1.41
0.00005
c185_g225
SSA_0170
322.87
127.58
−1.39
0.00005
c185_g78b,c
SSA_1066
2,400.31
795.49
−1.54
0.00005
c184_g80b,c
SSA_2141
159.49
35.60
−2.04
0.00006
c184_g2b,c,m
SSA_1349
397.55
162.35
−1.43
0.00007
c183_g117
SSA_0822
2,617.79
1,302.75
−1.19
0.00008
c182_g14
SSA_1888
111.54
44.66
−1.36
0.00008
c184_g325b,c
SSA_2318
222.14
140.91
−1.05
0.00009
c184_g167
SSA_2204
379.26
146.64
−1.43
0.00013
c184_g171
SSA_2327
725.33
183.46
−1.77
0.00015
c185_g226c
SSA_1536
362.28
108.70
−1.67
0.00016
c184_g295b,c
SSA_1943
486.44
219.83
−1.28
0.00016
c184_g192b
SSA_1792
2,361.01
1,048.15
−1.30
0.00023
c368_g1b
SSA_1686
698.70
346.62
−1.19
0.00034
c183_g102
SSA_1971
163.74
43.06
−1.77
0.00039
c185_g11b,c,m
SSA_1538
501.04
212.97
−1.29
0.00045
c185_g232c
SSA_1319
449.03
197.37
−1.25
0.00054
c185_g249b,c
SSA_2347
1,513.35
707.94
−1.17
0.00057
c451_g1
SSA_2206
49.12
23.81
−1.43
0.00058
c185_g116m
SSA_0447
837.36
429.13
−1.09
0.00073
c184_g217b,c
SSA_0586
571.73
297.29
−1.07
0.00073
c239_g1
SSA_2184
105.81
52.60
−1.22
0.00084
c185_g204b
SSA_1996
3,713.76
1,794.79
−1.12
0.00096
c143_g1c
SSA_0829
468.71
243.16
−1.17
0.00099
c185_g126b
SSA_0441
749.31
344.66
−1.25
0.00099
c185_g99b,c,m
SSA_1998
6,630.45
3,358.26
−1.18
0.00115
c185_g158b,c
SSA_2035
8,721.98
3,613.72
−1.39
0.00122
c185_g119
SSA_2345
1,569.92
800.80
−1.27
0.00123
c183_g133
SSA_0818
79.50
48.38
−1.08
0.00136
c184_g265c
SSA_2188
422.17
187.22
−1.20
0.00138
c184_g124
SSA_1645
205.11
110.75
−1.06
0.00144
c185_g13b,m
SSA_0851
315.14
121.60
−1.38
0.00149
c183_g68b
SSA_0314
123.09
66.54
−1.06
0.00156
c185_g248
SSA_0169
686.51
304.62
−1.35
0.00165
c184_g269
SSA_0844
511.20
217.67
−1.23
0.00187
c183_g105b,c
SSA_1223
6,575.54
2,568.83
−1.44
0.00189
c185_g132
SSA_0885a
302.27
159.87
−1.04
0.00198
c185_g214b
SSA_1992
6,628.39
2,941.07
−1.27
0.00261
c185_g31
SSA_0227
162.37
80.65
−1.07
0.00280
c184_g311
SSA_0701
1,885.59
1,157.84
−1.17
0.00304
c184_g332c
SSA_2249
83.46
50.01
−1.12
0.00304
c184_g58b
SSA_2205
3,704.78
1,616.27
−1.28
0.00339
c184_g126b,c
SSA_1060
9,769.74
4,519.35
−1.29
0.00381
c377_g1b,c,m
SSA_0716
176.63
98.16
−1.06
0.00384
c308_g1c
SSA_0617
427.06
209.58
−1.06
0.00402
c204_g1
SSA_0016
34.59
19.85
−1.51
0.00570
c184_g117b
SSA_2210
122.64
61.28
−1.05
0.00747
c185_g72c
SSA_0167
148.20
77.07
−1.03
0.00815
c185_g137b
SSA_2061
1,259.10
646.43
−1.06
0.00859
c185_g212b,c
SSA_1520
63,068.97
28,654.30
−1.14
0.01051
c197_g1
SSA_1671
48.54
30.95
−1.02
0.01211
c185_g202
SSA_2067
367.77
186.16
−1.03
0.01220
c185_g63b,c
SSA_1310
7,265.45
3,285.79
−1.11
0.01265
c184_g232
SSA_0723
193.60
102.67
−1.15
0.01310
c185_g257b
SSA_2374
169.52
84.74
−1.01
0.01422
c184_g26b,c,m
SSA_2133
145.08
92.99
−1.01
0.01598
c184_g30b,c
SSA_2142
36.71
10.44
−1.55
0.03134
Genes associated with putative cre-sites.
GO classification:biological process(BP).
GO classification: cellular component(CC).
GO classification: molecular function(MF).
Figure 1
Analysis and validation of DEGs obtained by the RNA-Seq experiments. (A) Hierarchical clustering analysis and heatmap of the 195 DEGs with the smallest q-values. Three biological replicates of each group were analyzed separately. (B) qRT-PCR validation of selected DEGs, with expression level in ΔCcpA mutant normalized to the SK36 wild type. The transcript levels of (a) SSAA-1575, (b) SSA-2379, (c) SSA-0016, and (d) SSA-0391 of ΔCcpA mutant were detected by qRT-PCR. The data presented are averages and standard deviations of three independent experiments with similar results, triplicate in each experiment. **Indicates the significant difference at P < 0.01 compared to the SK36.
The DEGs of ΔCcpA mutant.Genes associated with putative cre-sites.GO classification:biological process(BP).GO classification: cellular component(CC).GO classification: molecular function(MF).Analysis and validation of DEGs obtained by the RNA-Seq experiments. (A) Hierarchical clustering analysis and heatmap of the 195 DEGs with the smallest q-values. Three biological replicates of each group were analyzed separately. (B) qRT-PCR validation of selected DEGs, with expression level in ΔCcpA mutant normalized to the SK36 wild type. The transcript levels of (a) SSAA-1575, (b) SSA-2379, (c) SSA-0016, and (d) SSA-0391 of ΔCcpA mutant were detected by qRT-PCR. The data presented are averages and standard deviations of three independent experiments with similar results, triplicate in each experiment. **Indicates the significant difference at P < 0.01 compared to the SK36.
Confirmation of RNA-Seq Results by qRT-PCR
To validate the DEGs observed by the RNA-Seq experiments, we randomly selected four DEGs (SSA-1575, SSA-2379, SSA-0016, and SSA-0391) to examine the transcript levels by qRT-PCR. The results of qRT-PCR matched those of the RNA-seq: the expression of SSA-1575, SSA-2379, SSA-0016, and SSA-0391 in ΔCcpA mutant were 3.27-, 0.28-, 0.37-, 6.08-fold compared to wild type SK36, respectively (Figure 1B). The consistent results revealed that the DEGs obtained by RNA-Seq data is reliable and efficient.
Gene Ontology (GO) and Pathway Analysis of DEGs
Then, to characterize DEGs in functional groups and identify pathways that were significantly regulated by S. sanguinisCcpA, we performed GO terms and pathway analyses. Of the 85-down regulated DEGs, 56 DEGs could be assigned to a significant GO classification. Of the 84-up regulated DEGs, 74 DEGs could be assigned to a significant GO classification (Figure 2, Supplementary File 4). These results suggested that DEGs predominately involved in basic metabolic processes. Then KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed to identify pathways that regulated by CcpA, among the 85 down-regulated and 84 up-regulated DEGs, 27 and 48 DEGs were mapped to 24 and 33 KEGG pathways, respectively (Supplementary File 5). Seven pathways namely-“Pyruvate metabolism,” “Butanoate metabolism,” “Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism,” “Propanoate metabolism,” “Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis,” “Carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes,” and “Phosphotransferase system (PTS)” were the most significant (P < 0.05) pathway represented by the up-regulated DEGs, while the down-regulated DEGs predominantly involved in the “Arginine and proline metabolism,” “Biosynthesis of amino acids,” and “2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism” pathway (Figure 3).
Figure 2
Gene Ontology (GO) classification of DEGs. Genes were annotated in three categories: biological process, molecular function, and cellular component. Y-axis represents the gene counts of a specific category of DEGs within that main category. X-axis represents the top 10 significant (p < 0.05) enrichment pathway Term (If less than 10,it represents all enrichment pathway Terms). (A,B) Represent CcpA case vs. WT ctrl down-regulated genes GO Term and CcpA case vs. WT ctrl up-regulated genes GO Term, respectively.
Figure 3
KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs. Here represents CcpA case vs. WT ctrl significantly (P < 0.05) up-regulated genes pathway enrichment and CcpA case vs. WT ctrl significantly (P < 0.05) down-regulated genes pathway enrichment, respectively.
Gene Ontology (GO) classification of DEGs. Genes were annotated in three categories: biological process, molecular function, and cellular component. Y-axis represents the gene counts of a specific category of DEGs within that main category. X-axis represents the top 10 significant (p < 0.05) enrichment pathway Term (If less than 10,it represents all enrichment pathway Terms). (A,B) Represent CcpA case vs. WT ctrl down-regulated genes GO Term and CcpA case vs. WT ctrl up-regulated genes GO Term, respectively.KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs. Here represents CcpA case vs. WT ctrl significantly (P < 0.05) up-regulated genes pathway enrichment and CcpA case vs. WT ctrl significantly (P < 0.05) down-regulated genes pathway enrichment, respectively.
ΔCcpA Mutant Shows Decreased Formation of Biofilm
Regarding of the importance of biofilm formation in infective endocarditis (Moser et al., 2017), we further explored the potential role of CcpA in the formation of biofilm. We observed biofilm development in vitro by a microtiter plate assay. As expected, quantitative analysis of biofilm production of SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+ grown on the microtiter plate surface indicated that ΔCcpA showed weakened biofilm-forming ability compared to SK36 and CcpA+ (Figure 4).
Figure 4
The effect of CcpA on the formation of biofilm. SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+ strains cultures were inoculated into microtiter plates and anaerobically grown as static cultures for 48 h at 37°C to form biofilms. (A) Representative of microtiter plate wells from each experiment showing the respective biofilm formation of each S. sanguinis strain. (B) Quantitative analysis of biofilm production measuring at 570 nm using a microplate reader. The data presented are averages and standard deviations of three independent experiments with similar results, triplicate in each experiment. *Indicates the significant difference at P < 0.05 compared to the SK36.
The effect of CcpA on the formation of biofilm. SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+ strains cultures were inoculated into microtiter plates and anaerobically grown as static cultures for 48 h at 37°C to form biofilms. (A) Representative of microtiter plate wells from each experiment showing the respective biofilm formation of each S. sanguinis strain. (B) Quantitative analysis of biofilm production measuring at 570 nm using a microplate reader. The data presented are averages and standard deviations of three independent experiments with similar results, triplicate in each experiment. *Indicates the significant difference at P < 0.05 compared to the SK36.
ΔCcpA Shows Impaired EPS Production
To investigate the role that CcpA plays in EPS production in S. sanguinis, the Congo red agar (CRA) plate test was performed. The direct analysis of the colonies formed on CRA plate allows the recognition of EPS-producing strains (Teather and Wood, 1982; Freeman et al., 1989). Results showed that there was an obvious distinction in the appearance of ΔCcpA compared to SK36. ΔCcpA produced pink colonies, whereas SK36 and CcpA + formed black colonies, suggesting that CcpA is required for EPS production in S. sanguinis (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Detection of EPS production by CRA plate test. SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+strains were inoculated on the CRA plates. Through the different color of colonies formed on the solid medium to recognize the EPS-producing strains (characterized by black colonies on the red agar) and non-EPS-producing strains (pink/red colored colonies).
Detection of EPS production by CRA plate test. SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+strains were inoculated on the CRA plates. Through the different color of colonies formed on the solid medium to recognize the EPS-producing strains (characterized by black colonies on the red agar) and non-EPS-producing strains (pink/red colored colonies).
CcpA Contributes to the Virulence of S. sanguinis in IE
Some studies demonstrated that disruptions in biofilm formation result in attenuation of virulence in some streptococcal species (Shenoy et al., 2017). However, the relationship between S. sanguinis biofilm formation and its pathogenicity in endocarditis was controversy, previous works have shown that there was no correlation between biofilm formation in vitro and virulence in vivo for S. sanguinis (Ge et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2018; Baker et al., 2019). We then further probe the role CcpA plays in virulence of S. sanguinis in a rabbit infective endocarditis model. In this study, rabbits were inoculated with 1 × 109 CFU of SK36, ΔCcpA, or CcpA+ strains by intravenous. Twenty-four hours after inoculation, bacteria recovered from the blood ranged from 102 to 103 CFU per 1 ml of blood. The counts of ΔCcpA were obviously fewer than SK36 and CcpA+, P < 0.01 (Figure 6A). Three days after injection, the vegetation masses from the control group were barely observable (mean = 0.032 g), while the resulting vegetations from SK36, ΔCcpA, and CcpA+ were apparent in macroscopic lesions, the means of the vegetation masses were 0.194, 0.126, and 0.195 g, respectively, there was a significant difference between ΔCcpA with SK36 (P < 0.01; Figure 6B). Bacterial load from the vegetations per rabbit varied from 107 to 1010 CFU, and the bacterial load of ΔCcpA was reduced compared to SK36 and CcpA+ (Figure 6C). Furthermore, the bacterial load and vegetation masses were significantly correlated, R2 = 0.420, N = 36 (Figure 6D). According to this data, CcpA seems to be involved in the virulence of SK36 and CcpA+ strains.
Figure 6
CcpA affects bacterial load and vegetation weight in a S. sanguinis rabbit IE model. (A) Bacterial loads in blood of the rabbit IE model were enumerated as log10 total CFU 24 h after infection. (B) Vegetation masses from the valves of each rabbit IE model were weighed 3 days after infection. (C) Bacterial loads in vegetations of the rabbit IE model were enumerated as log10 total CFU. The data presented are mean value standard error (SE). *,**Indicate the significant difference at P < 0.05 and <0.01, respectively compared to the SK36. (D) Plot represents the correlation between the vegetation bacterial load (total CFU) and vegetation mass. R2 = 0.420 (n = 36) indicated that there was a correlation between them.
CcpA affects bacterial load and vegetation weight in a S. sanguinis rabbit IE model. (A) Bacterial loads in blood of the rabbit IE model were enumerated as log10 total CFU 24 h after infection. (B) Vegetation masses from the valves of each rabbit IE model were weighed 3 days after infection. (C) Bacterial loads in vegetations of the rabbit IE model were enumerated as log10 total CFU. The data presented are mean value standard error (SE). *,**Indicate the significant difference at P < 0.05 and <0.01, respectively compared to the SK36. (D) Plot represents the correlation between the vegetation bacterial load (total CFU) and vegetation mass. R2 = 0.420 (n = 36) indicated that there was a correlation between them.
Discussion
CcpA as one of the global regulators, influences the transcription of target genes by many mechanisms, but our understanding of CcpA activity and the mechanism by which CcpA exerts its regulation in S. sanguinis are limited. Here, we analyzed the transcriptional profile of S. sanguinisSK36 wild-type and its CcpA-null derivative (ΔCcpA) by RNA-seq and provided a global view of potential targets that regulator CcpA regulated. We found that 169 unigenes were significantly differentially expressed when deleted CcpA in S. sanguinis (down-regulated 85 unigenes and up-regulated 84 unigenes expression) comparing to wild type SK36 (Table 2). When we compared the DEGs of ΔCcpA mutant with Regulon of CcpA in S. sanguinisSK36 in the RegPrecise database (the Regprecise search of the S. sanguinisSK36 genome yielded 133 genes in 66 operons with potential cre-sites detected in their promoter regions), found 33 operons (60 genes) of the 66 predicted cre sites (133genes) (Supplementary File 1) that matched the 173 genes differentially expressed, 28 of the 66 predicted operons by Regprecise were not among the genes found to be differentially expressed in a CcpA mutant, and 5 of 66 the operons (SSA_1127, SSA_0219 to SSA_0224, SSA_0267, SSA_0395, SSA_1065) were not detected in this study. Here we provide the complete list of Regulon of CcpA in S. sanguinisSK36 and the genes found to be differentially expressed in a CcpA mutant (Supplementary File 3). This means that less than half of the differentially expressed genes have a cre site and may therefore be directly regulated by CcpA. In agreement with data from a previous study of S. mutans (Zeng et al., 2013) in which about half of the operons predicted by Regprecise were not among the genes found to be differentially expressed in a CcpA mutant. When referred to the literature, we also have known that only 38 of the 226 genes (17%) in S. aureus and 76 of the 124 genes (61%) in group A streptococcus (GAS) regulated by CcpA present a predicted cre in the beginning of an operon (Kinkel and McIver, 2008; Seidl et al., 2009), all these support our data. Therefore, the regulatory mechanism of CcpA is complicated and analyzing the sequence of the promoter region using prediction tools is not a desirable method to recognize potential target genes of global regulator CcpA.Although RNA-seq is an efficient method for determining transcriptional variations between biotypes, however, in some scenarios, differences observed at the transcript level are not seen at final protein expression, reflecting the importance of post-transcriptional and post-translational influence on the protein level. Therefore, to characterize the activity of CcpA in S. sanguinis is necessary. When analyzed the down regulated DEGs, we found a subset of genes, argB, argC, argG, argH, and argJ, all of these arg genes were associated with arginine biosynthesis. Many studies have reported the association between the arginine metabolism and biofilm development in S. sanguinis (Zhu et al., 2017; Nascimento et al., 2019), Streptococcus gordonii (Robinson et al., 2018), S. aureus and S. mutans (Zhu et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2017). Furthermore, another subset of regulated DEGs, comD, comEC, and comX related to the genetic competence system, can also influence biofilm formation which have been reported in S. mutans (Li et al., 2001; Aspiras et al., 2004; Perry et al., 2009). When we performed GO terms and pathway analyses Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyzes, we found that seven pathways were the most significant pathway represented by the up-regulated DEGs, the down-regulated DEGs predominantly involved in the “Arginine and proline metabolism,” “Biosynthesis of amino acids,” and “2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism” pathway, providing that CcpA not only regulated carbon catabolite metabolism, but also involved in some amino acid catabolite pathways. As we all known, many pathogens have been shown that specific metabolic pathways are associated with expression of virulence genes and coordinately regulate the disease progression in vivo studies (Somarajan et al., 2014; Bauer et al., 2018; Valdes et al., 2018). Thus, we were encouraged to investigate a possible role for CcpA in biofilm formation of S. sanguinis. As expected, by microtiter plate assay, we observed that CcpA inactivation impaired biofilm formation.Recently, some researchers demonstrated that the arginine biosynthetic genes, especially argB gene, mutation reduced polysaccharide production, resulting in the formation of a fragile biofilm in S. sanguinis (Zhu et al., 2017). Exopolysaccharides (EPS) are the primary part of the biofilm matrix, and EPS absence results in a biofilm deficient in some bacterial species (Munro and Macrina, 1993; Yang et al., 2009). However, when we looked into the DEGs, we found that the GtfP, responsible for glucan synthesis in S. sanguinis, is not in the list of the down regulated DEGs. When referred to the literature, we found that inactivating the GtfP gene did a marked reduction in the amount of water-soluble glucans in the culture supernatant, but not in the amount of water-insoluble glucans expressed on the bacterial cell surface (Yoshida et al., 2014), while the insoluble glucan is the major component of S. sanguinis biofilms reported by Bin Zhu and his coworkers (Zhu et al., 2017). Therefore, it is still necessary to characterize the role of CcpA play in EPS production in S. sanguinis. To our surprise, the result of Congo red agar (CRA) plate test showed that CcpA is indeed required for EPS production in S. sanguinis.Some studies demonstrated that disruptions in biofilm formation result in attenuation of virulence in some streptococcal species (Shenoy et al., 2017). However, the relationship between S. sanguinis biofilm formation and its pathogenicity in endocarditis was controversy, previous works have shown that there was no correlation between biofilm formation in vitro and virulence in vivo for S. sanguinis (Ge et al., 2008; Zhu et al., 2018; Baker et al., 2019), which prompt us to further probe the role CcpA plays in virulence of S. sanguinis. BLASTP analysis of the down regulated DEGs, indicated that SSA_0684 encode fibril-like structure subunit FibA and SSA_0829 (srpA), encode platelet-binding glycoprotein, which mediates the binding of S. sanguinis to human platelets (Loukachevitch et al., 2016); SSA_0391 (spxB), encode pyruvate oxidase, involved in survival of S. sanguinis in human blood (Sumioka et al., 2017), all of these genes correlate with virulence for S. sanguinisSK36. Thus, we characterized the role of CcpA plays in virulence of S. sanguinis in a rabbit infective endocarditis model. The results showed that vegetation masses and the bacterial load from the blood and vegetations of ΔCcpA group were reduced compared to SK36 and CcpA+. In this study, we present data showing that CcpA is a global regulator involved in many metabolic processes and related to virulence, these findings will undoubtedly contribute to investigate the mechanistic links between the global regulator CcpA and the virulence of S. sanguinis.Regarding the data from the previous report, CcpA was expressed in wild-type SK36 at different growth phases at a similar level (Chen C. et al., 2019), combined with the growth profiles of CcpA mutant, we selected the mid-logarithmic phase for transcriptome analysis, encouraged by previous studies (Lu et al., 2018; Chen C. et al., 2019). Even though we noticed that some gene expression was influenced by growth phase, for example, previous work has shown that a larger amount of SSA_2315 protein was detected from cultures at late log phase than from cultures at early log phase, suggesting that the expression of SSA_2315 was influenced by growth phase, thus missing some genes is unescapable. Maybe, that is why the SSA_2315 was not detected in this study. Furthermore, several phenotypes, including biofilm and virulence, were shown to be affected by growth phase, therefore, we still could not exclude the contribution of the slow growth of CcpA mutants to affect the phenotypes. This concern was encouraged by a study of Streptococcus pyogenes (Paluscio et al., 2018) in which they proposed the pathogen temporal regulation mode that growth/damage balance can be actively controlled by the pathogen and implicate CcpA as a master regulator of this relationship.
Data Availability Statement
Data were deposited with the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at the National Center for Biotechnology Institute (accession PRJNA564466).
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the IACUC of the China Medical University Laboratory Animal Center.
Author Contributions
LZ and MS designed the study. YB, MS, AW, and MX were responsible for the acquisition of data. LS and LZ analyzed the experimental data. YB and LZ were the major contributors in drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Authors: Xuelian Huang; Keke Zhang; Meng Deng; Robertus A M Exterkate; Chengcheng Liu; Xuedong Zhou; Lei Cheng; Jacob M Ten Cate Journal: Arch Oral Biol Date: 2017-06-24 Impact factor: 2.633
Authors: Kayla M Valdes; Ganesh S Sundar; Ashton T Belew; Emrul Islam; Najib M El-Sayed; Yoann Le Breton; Kevin S McIver Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tanya Puccio; Seon-Sook An; Alexander C Schultz; Claudia A Lizarraga; Ashley S Bryant; David J Culp; Robert A Burne; Todd Kitten Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 2021-12-18 Impact factor: 3.979