In light of increasing interest in the development of organic-organic multicomponent heterostructures on metals, this molecular-scale study investigates prototypical composite systems of ultrathin porphyrin and ionic liquid (IL) films on metallic supports under well-defined ultrahigh vacuum conditions. By means of angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, we investigated the adsorption, stability, and thermal exchange of the resulting films after sequential physical vapor deposition of the free-base porphyrin 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin, 2H-TPP, and the IL 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C8C1Im][PF6], on Ag(111) and Au(111). 2H-TPP shows two-dimensional growth of up to two closed molecular layers on Ag(111) and Au(111) and three-dimensional island growth for thicker films. IL films on top of a monolayer of 2H-TPP exhibit Stranski-Krastanov-like growth and are stable up to 385 K. The 2H-TPP layer leads to destabilization of the IL films, compared to the IL in direct contact with the bare metals, by inhibiting the specific adsorption of the ions on the metal surfaces. When the porphyrin is deposited on top of [C8C1Im][PF6] at low temperature, the 2H-TPP molecules adsorb on top of the IL film at first but replace the IL at the IL/metal interfaces upon heating above 240 K. This exchange process is most likely driven by the higher adsorption energy of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces, as compared to the IL. The behavior observed on Ag(111) and Au(111) is identical. The results are highly relevant for the stability of porphyrin/IL-based thin film catalyst systems and molecular devices, and more generally, stacked organic multilayer architectures.
In light of increasing interest in the development of organic-organic multicomponent heterostructures on metals, this molecular-scale study investigates prototypical composite systems of ultrathin porphyrin and ionic liquid (IL) films on metallic supports under well-defined ultrahigh vacuum conditions. By means of angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, we investigated the adsorption, stability, and thermal exchange of the resulting films after sequential physical vapor deposition of the free-base porphyrin5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin, 2H-TPP, and the IL 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C8C1Im][PF6], on Ag(111) and Au(111). 2H-TPP shows two-dimensional growth of up to two closed molecular layers on Ag(111) and Au(111) and three-dimensional island growth for thicker films. IL films on top of a monolayer of 2H-TPP exhibit Stranski-Krastanov-like growth and are stable up to 385 K. The 2H-TPP layer leads to destabilization of the IL films, compared to the IL in direct contact with the bare metals, by inhibiting the specific adsorption of the ions on the metal surfaces. When the porphyrin is deposited on top of [C8C1Im][PF6] at low temperature, the 2H-TPP molecules adsorb on top of the IL film at first but replace the IL at the IL/metal interfaces upon heating above 240 K. This exchange process is most likely driven by the higher adsorption energy of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces, as compared to the IL. The behavior observed on Ag(111) and Au(111) is identical. The results are highly relevant for the stability of porphyrin/IL-based thin film catalyst systems and molecular devices, and more generally, stacked organic multilayer architectures.
One key ingredient for
the development of high-performance, multicomponent,
molecular thin-film devices is a molecular-level understanding of
the adsorption and assembly of organic constituents on the solid substrate.
Desired surface and interface arrangements and properties can only
be achieved by deliberate choice of the involved molecular building
blocks and control of the interplay between molecule–substrate
and intermolecular interactions.[1−10]Owing to their vital role in numerous biological catalytic
reactions
and transport processes,[11,12] porphyrins are of particular
interest for technical applications.[6,7,9,13−17] They offer great functional diversity by variation of the substituents
at the periphery of the tetrapyrrole core of the molecule. Knowledge
and control of the formation and structure of self-assembled porphyrin
adlayers on the surface of solid supports are essential for the synthesis
of custom-tailored environments and catalysts.[5,8,9,13,14,18] The preparation of
catalytically active porphyrin-functionalized metal surfaces can be
achieved by physical vapor deposition (PVD) in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV).[5,9,19] One particularly popular and
well-studied representative is 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (2H-TPP,
see Figure a).
Figure 1
Molecular structures
and van der Waals models of (a) 2H-TPP and
(b) [C8C1Im][PF6].
Molecular structures
and van der Waals models of (a) 2H-TPP and
(b) [C8C1Im][PF6].With reference to the rapidly growing interest
in the development
of organic–organic multicomponent heterostructures on metals,[10,20−28] recent studies on porphyrins and related aromatic molecules highlight
the importance of the strength of the organic–metal interaction
and how it relates to the stability and arrangement of stacked multilayer
architectures within organic bilayer structures on metals.[10,27,28]Wang et al. studied the
deposition of copper-phthalocyanine (Cu-Pc)
onto monolayers of 6,13-pentacenequinone (P2O) or 5,7,12,14-pentacenetetrone
(P4O) on Ag(111) at room temperature (RT). They found that P2O is
exchanged by Cu-Pc on the Ag(111) surface, whereas for P4O, no exchange
occurs, that is, Cu-Pc remains on top of the P4O layer.[27]Gallego et al.[29] deposited a fullerene
derivative (phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester, PCBM) onto a layer
of a TTF derivative (2-[9-(1,3-dithiol-2-ylidene)anthracen-10(9H)-ylidene]-1,3-dithiole, exTTF) on Au(111). PCBM was found
to replace a large fraction of the exTTF molecules from the metal
surface to the outer surface because of preferential interaction with
the gold substrate. This exchange does not occur, however, if the
thickness of the exTTF layer is more than one monolayer.[29]Deimel et al.[30] studied the deposition
of ruthenium-tetraphenylporphyrin [Ru(CO)TPP] and iron-phthalocyanine
(Fe-Pc) on a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of 4-fluorothiophenol
(4-FTP) on Ag(111) at 90 K. Upon heating the resulting Ru(CO)TPP/4-FTP/Ag(111)
and Fe-Pc/4-FTP/Ag(111) systems, they observed by temperature-programmed
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) that the Ru(CO)TPP and Fe-Pc
molecules slip under the SAM at temperatures of 175 and 235 K, respectively.
On the basis of earlier work,[20,31−33] they concluded that the interaction of Fe-Pc with the silver substrate
is comparatively stronger.[30]Interestingly,
various other porphyrins deposited onto SAMs on
Au, that is, 2H-TPP/CH2SH (with 8–16 C atoms; SAM thickness: 1.25–2.13
nm),[33] Co-TPP on 4-pyridinethiolate,[31] and 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethylporphinatozinc
(Zn-OEP) on 4-pyridinethiolate,[32] appeared
to be stable at RT. In the latter two cases, the N atom of 4-pyridinethiolate
binds to the respective centralmetal atom of Co-TPP and Zn-OEP.[31,32]Thussing and Jakob[28] also observed
temperature-dependent
exchange processes while heating stacked layers of Cu-Pc and 3,4,9,10-perylene-tetracarboxylic-dianhydride
(PTCDA) on Ag(111) deposited at 80 K. Notably, the thermal stability
of the bilayer changes drastically if the order of the stack is reversed,
which is related to the simultaneous desorption of molecules.[28] Similar exchange and desorption phenomena were
observed for bilayers of titanyl-phthalocyanine and PTCDA on Ag(111).[10]The aim of our study now is to study the
interaction of adsorbed
porphyrin monolayers with ionic liquids (ILs) and the stability of
sequentially deposited composite layers under well-defined UHV conditions.
As far as we are aware of, this is the first investigation of this
kind. ILs are salts with a melting point typically below 100 °C,
which combine extremely low vapor pressures with a large number of
tunable chemical and physicochemical properties, depending on the
nature of their cation/anion combination. In analogy to the above-mentioned
examples, molecular exchange and preferential adsorption were also
observed after sequential deposition of two different ILs on Ag(111).[34,35] In particular, the selective replacement of anions and cations at
the metal interface was found. After deposition below 90 K, the exchange
occurs during heating at around 190 K. This temperature agrees well
with the bulk glass transition temperature of the postdeposited IL.[34,35]Thin films of ILs are of high relevance for a variety of applications.
Deposited on high surface area solid supports, they are the key ingredient
to effective SCILL[36] (solid catalyst with
IL layer) and SILP[37−39] (supported IL phase) catalysts.[36−38,40−53] Furthermore, they also show an increasing potential for widespread
use, for example, in sensors,[48,54−57] lubrication,[58−60] separation,[39,48,57,61−63] electrochemistry,[48,57,64−75] and dye-sensitized solar cell[76,77] technologies. For these
thin IL film applications, the function, performance, and stability
of the system are strongly determined by the interface properties.[53,78−83] Understanding in detail the interaction of the IL with the support
is of high importance. The specifics of the interaction determine
how the ions arrange at the interface and whether the IL film grows
in the form of uniform layers or three-dimensional (3D) islands.[34,53,83−90]For the present study, we choose the free-base porphyrin 2H-TPP
(Figure a) and the
IL [C8C1Im][PF6] (Figure b) as prototypical representatives
of porphyrin and IL species, respectively. These appear as promising
candidates for forming layered IL/porphyrin films because 2H-TPP does
not dissolve in [C8C1Im][PF6], as
has been checked by dissolution experiments. Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces
serve as supports. In addition to the excellent suitability as model
systems, Ag and Au could be relevant for future applications in SCILL[89] in the form of Au/Ag alloys where Ag activates
molecular oxygen in oxygen-assisted coupling reactions.[91,92] Ag(111) and Au(111) show low reactivity toward 2H-TPP and [C8C1Im][PF6], and no changes in the atomic
structure of these surfaces were reported upon deposition of porphyrins
or ILs.[5,89,93] On the basis
of earlier detailed studies of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111)[34,35] and of 2H-TPP on Ag(111)[94−96] and Au(111),[33,96,97] our study aims for a detailed analysis of the interaction of porphyrins
with ILs at support interfaces and sets the ground for potential future
studies of reactions (e.g., metalation)[94,95,98] of porphyrins at IL/solid interfaces. The experiments
were performed using angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(ARXPS) with Al Kα radiation at emission angles of 0° and
80°. The information depth (ID) is 7–9 nm at 0° (depending
on the kinetic energy) and only 1–1.5 nm at 80°. Thus,
in the latter case, the experiment is about 6 times more surface sensitive,
and mainly the topmost surface layer is probed (for details see the Experimental Section).
Experimental Section
[C8C1Im][PF6] was purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich (purity >95%), and 2H-TPP was purchased from Porphyrin
Systems (purity 98%). Both chemicals were carefully degassed in UHV
at an elevated temperature prior to the deposition experiments. [C8C1Im][PF6] and 2H-TPP were deposited
via PVD[19,34,35,89,99] using two separate
effusion cells[34] at cell temperatures of
around 443 and 590 K, respectively. The flux was checked with a quartz
crystal microbalance before and after deposition. With the exception
of dialkylimidazolium halides,[100,101] most other alkylimidazolium
ILs evaporate intact in the form of neutral ion pairs.[34,35,85,89,99,101−110]Round Ag(111) and Au(111)single crystals with diameters of
15
mm were purchased from MaTeck (purity 99.999%, polished with an alignment
better than 0.1° to the (111) plane). The crystals were prepared
by Ar+ sputtering (600 V, 8 μA, 30 min) followed
by annealing (800 K, 10 min). The temperature of the single crystals
was measured using type K thermocouples put into a 0.5 mm wide pinhole
of the crystal with an absolute accuracy of ±20 K and a reproducibility
of ±2 K.The UHV system ARXPS has been described previously.[89] In short, the ARXP spectra were acquired using
a nonmonochromated Al Kα X-ray source (SPECS XR 50, 1486.6 eV,
240 W) and a hemispherical electron analyzer (VG SCIENTA R3000). A
pass energy of 100 eV was applied for all spectra yielding an overall
energy resolution of about 0.9 eV.[89] The
spectra were quantitatively evaluated in CasaXPS V2.3.16Dev6. We subtracted
Shirley backgrounds[111] for Ag 3d and Au
4f core levels. Because of overlapping plasmon and shake-up satellites
and the inelastically scattered electrons of the Ag 3d lines,[112−115] an additional background was subtracted in the N 1s region on Ag(111);
for further details, see ref (89). In all other cases (N 1s on Au(111) and F 1s and C 1s
spectra on both substrates), linear backgrounds were subtracted. The
IL spectra were fitted with a Voigt profile (30% Lorentzian contribution).
For fitting of the IL C 1s peaks, we applied a constraint of fwhm(Chetero) = 1.11 × fwhm(Calkyl).[34,35,89,105] All binding energies (BEs) were referenced to the Fermi edge, yielding
368.2 eV for the Ag 3d5/2 line and 83.85 eV for Au 4f7/2. Temperature-programmed XPS was performed at a heating
rate of 2 K/min.The coverage of 2H-TPP and [C8C1Im][PF6] on the metal surfaces was characterized
by measuring the
attenuation of the substrate signal (Ag 3d, Au 4f) at an emission
angle of ϑ = 0°. The interface composition was determined
by comparing the relative intensities from the quantitative analysis
of the XP spectra in 0° and 80° emission. When using Al
Kα radiation, the ID at normal emission ϑ = 0° is
7–9 nm (depending on the kinetic energy). At ϑ = 80°,
ID is only 1–1.5 nm, which means that only the topmost surface
layers are probed. ID is defined as 3 times the inelastic mean free
path, λ, of an electron at a given kinetic energy.[34] For Ag 3d electrons with a kinetic energy around
1.1 keV, λ is 2.5 nm in IL films,[34,89] and for Au
4f electrons (1.4 keV), it is 3.0 nm.[87,105,116,117] On the basis of the
similarities in chemical composition and density, similar λ
values for 2H-TPP are assumed.For homogeneous two-dimensional
(2D) growth, the substrate signal
at the angle ϑ decreases from its intensity I0 for the clean surface to a value Id for a film with thickness d according to[34,89,105]Note that for ideal layer-by-layer
growth (i.e., each individual
layer is completed before a new layer starts to grow on top), the
substrate signals should decrease in a section-wise linear fashion
for each layer.[85,105,118] The statistics of our data are, however, insufficient to clearly
resolve the slope changes between adjacent straight sections. Similar
to previous studies,[34,35,85,87,89,119,120] we determined information
on the growth behavior by first estimating the mean film thickness d for each deposition experiment from the Id/I0 ratios in the bulk-sensitive
geometry at ϑ = 0° according to eq . Using this thickness, we then calculated
the value expected for 2D growth in the surface-sensitive geometry
at 80°, again using eq . Agreement between the experimental data at 80° and
the calculation for 80° indicates 2D growth, whereas Id/I0(80°) ratios
above the calculated curve indicate a 3D morphology of the IL film;
similar behavior has been described for several other systems.[34,35,85,87,89,119,120]IL coverage is given in ML, where 1 ML is defined
as a closed double
layer of ions irrespective of their relative arrangement.[34,35,89,99,107] The monolayer height is calculated as the
cubic root of the molecular volume Vm based
on mass density ρ values from the literature. Using the literature
value for Vm,[121]hML of [C8C1Im][PF6] was calculated to be 0.77 nm.[34,35]In this
work, the porphyrin coverage is given in the number (multiples)
of complete layers. This means, one monolayer corresponds to one complete
layer with all porphyrin molecules in direct contact with the metal
surface. In some previous publications, the porphyrin coverage in
“ML” was defined as the number of porphyrin molecules
per metal atom of the substrate. For 2H-TPP on Ag(111), one monolayer
corresponds by this definition to a coverage of 0.037 ML.[94] To avoid any confusion, the unit “ML”
will not be used to denote porphyrin coverages in this work. Unless
indicated in the text otherwise, monolayer coverage of 2H-TPP on Ag(111)
and Au(111) was achieved by heating to 500 K (above the multilayer
desorption temperature)[122] after the deposition
of multilayers of porphyrin on the metal crystal. From the attenuation
of the substrate XPS signal in 0° emission, the height of the
2H-TPP monolayer was calculated to be 0.34 nm using λ = 2.5
nm on Ag(111) and λ = 3.0 nm on Au(111), as stated above. Upon
heating above 525 K, signs of dehydrogenation at the phenyl groups
were reported for 2H-TPP molecules in contact with the Ag(111) surface.[123] In this work, the porphyrin layers were only
heated to 500 K to avoid dehydrogenation at the molecule’s
periphery. XPS analysis did not give any indication of decomposition
upon heating up to 500 K.
Results and Discussion
Growth and Desorption of 2H-TPP on Ag(111)
and Au(111)
As a first step, we characterize the growth behavior
of 2H-TPP on the two different substrates. For coverages of up to
one closed layer of 2H-TPP, that is, for molecules in direct contact
with the substrate, the behavior is well-studied on Ag(111)[94−96] and Au(111).[33,96,97] In contrast, information on the multilayer structure of porphyrins
on metal substrates is scarce.[26,124−129] For applications in organic electronic devices, this multilayer
structure is of utmost importance[127,130] because the
molecular arrangement and orientation define parameters such as charge-carrier
mobility and device efficiency.[10,28,127,131]To investigate the growth
of 2H-TPP from sub-monolayer to multilayer coverages, we deposited
increasing amounts of 2H-TPP onto the two substrates. Figure shows the attenuation of the
ARXPS signal intensity (at 0° and 80°) of the supporting
metals (Ag 3d and Au 4f) as a function of porphyrin coverage on Ag(111)
and Au(111), respectively, for deposition at RT (between 295 and 315
K) and at low temperature (LT, between 80 and 85 K). Overall, we observe
very similar behavior on the two surfaces and at both temperatures.
In each case, the data for 80° (open symbols) exactly follows
the prediction for 2D growth (dashed lines; see the Experimental Section for details on the calculation) up to
one monolayer, that is, an average thickness of ∼0.34 nm. This
behavior indicates the formation of a homogeneous closed layer of
flat-lying porphyrin molecules, in line with the literature. Self-assembly
of the porphyrin molecules into extended, ordered 2D networks on Ag(111)
and Au(111) has been reported at RT and below 100 K.[33,93,95−97,132,133] Isolated 2H-TPP molecules
are considered highly mobile on both metal surfaces at 300 K,[96] and the formation of ordered 2D networks is
driven by the relatively strong molecule–molecule interaction.[5,33,93,96,97,122,123,132−139]
Figure 2
Attenuation
of the (a) Ag 3d and (b) Au 4f signals in 0° (closed
symbols) and 80° (open symbols) emission as a function of the
nominal porphyrin film thickness on Ag(111) and Au(111), respectively.
Porphyrin deposition was performed at RT (295–315 K, red) and
at LT (80–85 K, blue). Ideal curves for 2D growth were calculated
using values for λ of 2.5 nm for Ag 3d electrons and 3.0 nm
for Au 4f electrons. For more details, see the Experimental
Section.
Attenuation
of the (a) Ag 3d and (b) Au 4f signals in 0° (closed
symbols) and 80° (open symbols) emission as a function of the
nominalporphyrin film thickness on Ag(111) and Au(111), respectively.
Porphyrin deposition was performed at RT (295–315 K, red) and
at LT (80–85 K, blue). Idealcurves for 2D growth were calculated
using values for λ of 2.5 nm for Ag 3d electrons and 3.0 nm
for Au 4f electrons. For more details, see the Experimental
Section.The good agreement between the substrate signal
intensity and the
calculation for 2D growth continues until a coverage of approximately
two monolayers (∼0.68 nm) is reached. This behavior suggests
that upon increasing the coverage, a second closed layer is formed
on top of the first 2H-TPP layer. For higher coverages, the 80°
data points in Figure fall above the prediction for 2D growth (dashed lines), which is
indicative of 3D island growth. This growth behavior is denoted as
Stranski–Krastanov-like growth.[140] Pronounced 3D growth on top of two closed molecular layers was also
observed for Cu-Pc on Cu(111) at RT[129] and
for other large π-conjugated molecules on Ag(111) and Au(111).[141−144] While the initial 2D adlayers benefit from the strong adsorption
of the molecules to the metal surface, the formation of relaxed 3D
crystallites on top of the initial adlayers could be thermodynamically
favored because it lowers the contact area to the strained layers
below.[142] From crystallography, tetragonal[145] and triclinic[146] structures were reported for 2H-TPP. Within the porphyrin crystals,
the macrocycle is less twisted than in the surface-confined 2H-TPP
monolayer on Ag(111) and Au(111); furthermore, in the crystal, stacking
of the aromatic systems dominates the intermolecular interactions,[145,146] whereas in the 2H-TPP monolayer on Ag(111) and Au(111), T-type interactions
determine the structure.[97,133,134,136] This results not only in different
tilt angles of the phenyl legs with respect to the macrocycle but
generally very different molecular arrangements.[127]Comparing the data at RT (red) to that at LT (blue)
in Figure , we note
that the
variation of the support temperature between 80 and 315 K does not
affect the growth behavior of 2H-TPP on both surfaces in the first
two layers. In a previous study, Rojas et al.[132] reported for 2H-TPP on Ag(111) at 58 K the nucleation of
a second layer of porphyrin molecules on top of initial adislands
before the completion of the first layer. While terrace diffusion
on Ag(111) was reported to occur at temperatures as low as 58 K, the
porphyrin islands of double-layer height appeared to be stabilized
by limited diffusion of the molecules across the island boundaries.
Upon heating above 100 K, the second-layer porphyrin molecules crossed
the island boundaries and attached to the periphery of the first-layer
islands.[132] Our results indicate that immediately
after impact on the surface at 80–85 K, the kinetic energy
of the 2H-TPP molecules is large enough to enable diffusion across
the island boundaries, allowing for the formation of flat 2D islands
for coverages of up to two closed porphyrin layers on Ag(111) and
Au(111).Next, we address the thermal stability of 2H-TPP multilayers
on
Ag(111) and Au(111). Figure shows the thermal evolution of the porphyrinC 1s and the
corresponding metal substrate signals at 0° emission during heating
of 2H-TPP multilayer films up to 540 K. The behavior on both surfaces
is very similar. The signals remain constant until 440 K, where the
C 1s intensity starts to decrease, and simultaneously the Ag 3d and
Au 4f intensities increase. This behavior is attributed to desorption
of the 2H-TPP multilayers, which is completed at around 480 K; above
this temperature, no further changes are observed. From a Leading-Edge-like
analysis[107,147] of the data, we obtain an activation
energy EA of 193 kJ/mol (±22 kJ/mol)
for multilayer desorption of 2H-TPP. From the residualC 1s intensity
and the remaining attenuation of the Ag 3d and Au 4f substrate signals,
we conclude that one closed monolayer of intact 2H-TPP remains present
after multilayer desorption.
Figure 3
C 1s peak intensity (purple) and Ag 3d and Au
4f intensities (gray),
as determined from temperature-programmed XPS in 0° emission
upon heating three layers of 2H-TPP deposited on (a) Ag(111) and (b)
Au(111) at RT. Heating rate: 2 K/min.
C 1s peak intensity (purple) and Ag 3d and Au
4f intensities (gray),
as determined from temperature-programmed XPS in 0° emission
upon heating three layers of 2H-TPP deposited on (a) Ag(111) and (b)
Au(111) at RT. Heating rate: 2 K/min.Our observations are in agreement with a previous
temperature-programmed
desorption study of 2H-TPP on Ag(111),[122] where the multilayers were found to desorb below 490 K. Furthermore,
previous studies demonstrated—in contrast to earlier assumptions[9,122,123,127]—partial dehydrogenation of 2H-TPP monolayers on Ag(111) above
525 K.[9,122,123] While the
exact onset of decomposition is still not clear and no detailed study
on Au(111) is available, we refrained from heating above 500 K during
the preparation of a monolayer coverage of 2H-TPP by multilayer desorption
to avoid any undesired reactions of the 2H-TPP molecules. Di Santo
et al. reported a shift to lower BE of the N 1s and C 1ssignals and
a change in the C 1s peak shape after heating to 550 K in case of
Ag(111); both effects were attributed to a change in the orientation
of the phenyl groups of the 2H-TPP molecule relative to the metal
surface upon dehydrogenation.[123] In the
present study, the spectra of monolayer 2H-TPP films showed no difference
after heating to 500 K compared to films of similar thickness prepared
by direct deposition.
Growth and Desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6] on 2H-TPP-Covered Ag(111) and Au(111)
To study the interaction between the IL [C8C1Im][PF6] and the neutral2H-TPP molecule, we deposited
[C8C1Im][PF6] onto Ag(111) and Au(111)
covered with one closed monolayer of 2H-TPP (prepared by multilayer
desorption at 480 K, see previous section). For comparison, we performed
the same experiments also on bare surfaces. In each case, the IL growth
behavior was monitored via the attenuation of the metalsignals, Id/I0, as a function
of the IL film thickness; note that for the 2H-TPP-precovered surface, I0 is smaller than for the bare surface because
of the attenuation by the preadsorbed porphyrin layer. Figure shows the corresponding data
for IL deposition at RT (green and red symbols) and at LT (blue; only
for bare metal surfaces); the data for [C8C1Im][PF6] on bare Ag(111) was in part already published.[34] For ILs, the coverage of 1 ML is defined as
one layer ion pairs vertically arranged on top of each other,[34,35,85,89,99,105,120] with a height 0.77 nm for [C8C1Im][PF6];[34,35] thus, one closed layer of anions
and cations adsorbed next to each other corresponds to 0.5 ML (for
details, see the Experimental Section).
Figure 4
Attenuation
of the (a) Ag 3d and (b) Au 4f signals in 0° (closed)
and 80° (open) emission as a function of the nominal [C8C1Im][PF6] film thickness on Ag(111) and Au(111),
respectively. The IL films were deposited onto the 2H-TPP-precovered
(green) and pristine substrates at RT (295–315 K, red) and
at LT (80–85 K, blue). RT data for [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) was adapted in part from ref (34). Ideal curves for 2D growth
were calculated using values for λ of 2.5 nm for Ag 3d electrons
and 3.0 nm for Au 4f electrons. For more details, see the Experimental Section.
Attenuation
of the (a) Ag 3d and (b) Au 4f signals in 0° (closed)
and 80° (open) emission as a function of the nominal[C8C1Im][PF6] film thickness on Ag(111) and Au(111),
respectively. The IL films were deposited onto the 2H-TPP-precovered
(green) and pristine substrates at RT (295–315 K, red) and
at LT (80–85 K, blue). RT data for [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) was adapted in part from ref (34). Idealcurves for 2D growth
were calculated using values for λ of 2.5 nm for Ag 3d electrons
and 3.0 nm for Au 4f electrons. For more details, see the Experimental Section.Up to a coverage of 0.5 ML [C8C1Im][PF6] (0.38 nm), the 80° data for both
2H-TPP-precovered
surfaces in Figure (open green symbols) display the characteristics of 2D growth, that
is, they follow the dashed lines. This behavior indicates the formation
of a homogeneous IL wetting layer (WL) with anions and cations adsorbed
next to each other on top of the 2H-TPP monolayer. The formation of
a WL is also observed for [C8C1Im][PF6] on bare metal surfaces (open red symbols). At IL film thicknesses
above 0.5 ML, that is, starting with the second molecular IL layer,
we systematically find a lower attenuation (larger intensity) in the
80° data than predicted for ideal 2D growth (dashed line). This
deviation appears to be larger on the 2H-TPP-covered metals (green)
than on the bare metals (red, blue) and indicates a more pronounced
3D character of the IL islands. The growth behavior of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the bare Ag(111) and Au(111)
surfaces is very similar to each other and does not appear to be influenced
by a variation of the support temperature between 80 and 315 K. For
details on the molecular orientation for varying thicknesses of [C8C1Im][PF6] films on bare Ag(111) and
Au(111) at RT, see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information.Figure shows the
F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s spectra at 80° emission after deposition
of 1.3 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on top
of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) at RT. Notably, measurements at
80° (grazing emission) probe only the topmost surface layers.
With an ID of only 1–1.5 nm, the resulting XP spectra are very
sensitive to changes in the composition of the IL/vacuum interface
of the sample, for example, by reorientation, selective enrichment,
or preferential accumulation of one or more components.
Figure 5
XP spectra
of F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s core levels at 80° emission
for (I) the clean Ag(111) surface, (II) a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111),
(III) after deposition of 1.3 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the 2H-TPP monolayer at RT, and (IV) after heating the
film to 500 K. 2H-TPP-related signals are shown in purple color, and
IL-related signals are colored according to the vdW models in Figure .
XP spectra
of F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s core levels at 80° emission
for (I) the clean Ag(111) surface, (II) a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111),
(III) after deposition of 1.3 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the 2H-TPP monolayer at RT, and (IV) after heating the
film to 500 K. 2H-TPP-related signals are shown in purple color, and
IL-related signals are colored according to the vdW models in Figure .The C 1s spectrum of the 2H-TPP monolayer in Figure II displays one dominating
peak at 284.9
eV (violet), which corresponds to the 44 aromatic C atoms in the porphyrin
molecule,[123] along with two shake-up satellites
at 288.6 and 291.6 eV which are common for molecules with extended
conjugated π systems.[94,148] In the N 1s region,
we find two peaks (violet), one at 400.2 eV for the two pyrrolic (aminic,N–H) N atoms and one at 398.2 eV for the two iminic N atoms
of the free-base porphyrin molecule.[98,149] The ratio
of Niminic/Npyrrolic of 0.9 at 80° emission is somewhat smaller than the nominal
ratio of 1.0. This difference is attributed to the so-called saddle-shape
conformation of 2H-TPP on the Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces:[5,93,96,97,135] In this twisted conformation, the pyrrolic
N–H moieties point toward the vacuum side and the iminic N
atoms toward the metal surface. At 80° emission angle, this conformation
could lead to an enhanced signal for the former and an attenuated
signal for the latter because of inelastic scattering of the photoelectrons.The deposition of 1.3 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on top of the porphyrin monolayer on Ag(111), Figure III, results in two new contributions
in the C 1s region at 287.5 (gray) and 285.8 eV (yellow) because of
the five Chetero atoms (i.e., carbon bound to nitrogen
in the ring) and the seven Calkyl atoms (i.e., carbon bound
to carbon and hydrogen in the chain) of the imidazolium cation. The
additionalN 1s peak at 402.6 eV (gray) corresponds to the two N atoms
of the cation, and the F 1s peak at 687.3 eV (blue) corresponds to
the six F atoms of the [PF6]− anion.
The intensities of the porphyrinC 1s and N 1s signals strongly decrease
upon IL deposition; the BEs of the IL-related peaks correspond very
well to those of neat [C8C1Im][PF6] films of thickness similar to that of the porphyrin/IL composite
film described here. We therefore conclude that the IL film covers
the porphyrin layer, that is, the porphyrin molecules remain at the
Ag(111) interface with the IL on top.The deposition of an additional
monolayer equivalent of 2H-TPP
on top of an IL-covered 2H-TPP monolayer on Ag(111) at RT (see Figure
S2 in the Supporting Information) leads
to the intercalation of the second 2H-TPP layer between the IL and
the first 2H-TPP layer such that the IL film remains at the vacuum
interface with a 2H-TPP double layer below.For the Au(111)
surface, we obtain very similar results, as is
evident from Figure , where the F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s spectra at 80° are depicted
for 1.1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] deposited
on top of a single layer of 2H-TPP on Au(111) at RT. After deposition
of 2H-TPP (Figure II), we observe the expected porphyrin-related contributions. Upon
successive deposition of the IL on top of the porphyrin monolayer
(Figure III), we note
the same additional IL-related contributions as on Ag(111). Again,
similar to the situation above, the porphyrinsignals decrease considerably,
which shows that the IL film covers the porphyrin layer below while
the porphyrin molecules remain on the Au(111) surface. The consistent
observation of the porphyrin layer remaining at the substrate interface
for both metals rules out intercalation of the IL between the porphyrin
layer and the metal substrate under the applied experimental conditions.
This contrasts the situation, for example, ILs on graphene, where
spontaneous intercalation was observed at RT.[150]
Figure 6
XP spectra of F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s core levels at 80° emission
for (I) the clean Au(111) surface, (II) a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Au(111),
(III) after deposition of 1.1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the 2H-TPP monolayer at RT, and (IV) after heating the
film to 500 K (color coding as in Figure ).
XP spectra of F 1s, N 1s, and C 1s core levels at 80° emission
for (I) the clean Au(111) surface, (II) a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Au(111),
(III) after deposition of 1.1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on the 2H-TPP monolayer at RT, and (IV) after heating the
film to 500 K (color coding as in Figure ).In the next step, we studied the thermal stability
of the composite
films of IL on the porphyrin-covered metals by heating to 500 K. The
corresponding results for the Ag(111) surface are shown in Figure IV. After heating,
the XPS signals related to [C8C1Im][PF6] (yellow, gray, and blue) disappear entirely, and the initial intensities
of the porphyrin peaks in the C 1s and N 1s regions (violet) are restored.
This can be explained by complete desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6] from the surface, uncovering the intact
porphyrin monolayer below the IL layer without any signs of decomposition.For the IL film on the 2H-TPP-covered Au(111), we also observe
the complete removal of the anion-related F 1s signal after heating
to 500 K on Au(111), as is evident from Figure IV. However, in contrast to Ag(111), we note
a slight shift of the porphyrin-related signals to higher BE and residual
peaks, which seem to be related to the IL cation. The shift of the
2H-TPP-related N 1s and C 1ssignals to higher BE after desorption
could be a sign of dehydrogenation at the periphery of the 2H-TPP
molecules.[123] The residuals in the N 1s
and C 1s regions could be interpreted as a result of decomposition
of the IL in such a way that the [PF6]− anions are fully gone from the surface and fragments of the cation—perhaps
as a result of carbene formation—remain. Similar residuals
in the N 1s and C 1s spectra are also observed in slightly larger
amounts upon desorption of this IL from bare Au(111), that is, in
the absence of 2H-TPP (see Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). These observations indicate that the decomposition
occurs independently of the porphyrin interlayer. We carefully checked
for potential influence of X-ray beam damage; but neither lowering
the X-ray exposure from typically over 3 h for the whole heating series
to less than 10 min before recording the final spectra after heating
to 500 K nor varying the amount of IL deposited leads to notable changes
in the amount of residuals formed upon desorption of the IL from bare
and 2H-TPP-covered Au(111).Interestingly, complete desorption
of [C8C1Im][PF6] with no signs of
thermal decomposition has been
observed for bare and 2H-TPP-covered Ag(111). Note that this is not
generally the case on Ag(111), as thermal decomposition has been reported
for an imidazolium-based IL with a partially fluorinated alkyl chain.[35]In the following, we take a closer look
at the desorption processes
on the bare and the 2H-TPP-covered Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces. Figure shows the thermal
evolution of the IL FPF6signals (blue and orange) and
the substrate signals (gray) from in situ temperature-programmed XPS
at 0° emission upon heating with a constant heating rate of 2
K/min. On the bare metal surfaces (Figure a), the anion-related FPF6 intensity
stays nearly unchanged until about 385 K before it decreases to zero
in two steps. The intensity of the respective Ag 3d and Au 4f signals
increases accordingly. The first step with an inflection point at
405 K is attributed to the desorption of the IL multilayers, with
a single WL of [C8C1Im][PF6] remaining
on the surface.[34,35] From a Leading-Edge-like analysis[107,147] of the data, we obtain an activation energy EA of 167 kJ/mol (±18 kJ/mol) for multilayer desorption
of [C8C1Im][PF6], which is roughly
in agreement with the value of 143 kJ/mol (±4 kJ/mol) published
for [C8C1Im][PF6] desorption from
macroscopic IL samples.[102] The second step-wise
decrease in the intensity of the FPF6signal is in each
case attributed to desorption of the remaining IL WL. Comparing the
two graphs for the bare Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces in Figure a, we observe desorption of
the IL WL at a similar desorption temperature of about 445 K on both
supports.[34,35]
Figure 7
Thermal evolution of F 1s, Ag 3d, and Au 4f
signal intensities
at 0° emission from temperature-programmed XPS upon heating (a)
films of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111)
and Au(111) and (b) films of [C8C1Im][PF6] on a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111). The films
were heated from RT to 500 K with a heating rate of 2 K/min.
Thermal evolution of F 1s, Ag 3d, and Au 4f
signal intensities
at 0° emission from temperature-programmed XPS upon heating (a)
films of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111)
and Au(111) and (b) films of [C8C1Im][PF6] on a monolayer of 2H-TPP on Ag(111) and Au(111). The films
were heated from RT to 500 K with a heating rate of 2 K/min.The similar desorption temperature of the IL WL
from bare Ag(111)
and bare Au(111) indicates a similar adsorption energy of [C8C1Im][PF6] on both substrates. This behavior
is surprising at first sight as Ag surfaces are generally considered
more reactive than Au, an expectation that is based on the classic
d-band center model, which was established around small molecules
on metal surfaces.[8] On the other hand,
in light of the ionic nature of [C8C1Im][PF6] and the larger polarizability of Au compared to Ag,[8] one could expect a larger image dipole, yielding
a larger adsorption energy on Au(111). Interestingly, very similar
adsorption energies were also reported for structurally simpler aromatic
molecules such as benzene on Ag(111) and Au(111).[8,151,152] There, it was argued that the sensitivity
of many-body contributions to the planar atomic density of face-centered
cubic metals combined with the balance between Pauli repulsion and
van der Waals forces between molecules and surface atoms can lead
to very similar adsorption energies.[8] Concerning
the ILs studied here, we again note that on Au(111), the desorption
of the IL WL from Au(111) goes along with a certain degree of decomposition
(see above), which could also have an influence on the desorption
behavior.Next, we discuss the IL desorption on the 2H-TPP-covered
surfaces
in Figure b. The multilayer
desorption of [C8C1Im][PF6] is found
to be identical to that on the bare surfaces. Interestingly, we do
not observe the separate desorption of the WL at higher temperatures
like on the bare surfaces. Instead, the entire IL film desorbs until
425 K, that is, at the same temperature as the multilayer. This desorption
temperature of 405 K is about 40 K lower than the IL WL desorption
temperature of 445 K on bare Ag(111) and Au(111) in Figure a. From this observation, we
conclude that the interaction of [C8C1Im][PF6] with the 2H-TPP-covered surface is different from that with
the bare metal surfaces. The 2H-TPP layer acts as a spacer between
[C8C1Im][PF6] and the metals. It
effectively inhibits the specific interaction of the IL WL with the
metal, which leads to a pseudo-multilayer behavior of the IL WL on
2H-TPP. At this point, we need to mention that on the 2H-TPP-covered
Ag(111) surface, the IL appears sensitive to the X-ray exposure accumulated
prior to desorption. After exposing the system for more than 90 min,
we observe that a fraction of the F 1s signal can remain up to 480
K (not shown), which we attribute to beam damage. Thus, the experiments
had to be performed with minimum exposure to X-rays.After the
complete desorption of the IL, at 500 K, the intact porphyrin
layer is retained on Ag(111) (compare Figure IV to 5II), as already
mentioned above. On Au(111), the residual cation-related XPS signals
at 500 K on Au(111) (compare Figure IV to 6II) hint at a lower stability
of the [C8C1Im][PF6] WL on 2H-TPP-covered
Au(111) as a result of decomposition. As already mentioned above,
also the desorption of the IL from bare Au(111) shows similar residuals
in C 1s and N 1s, indicating that there is no direct influence of
the 2H-TPP layer on the decomposition of the IL.
Deposition at LT and Exchange of [C8C1Im][PF6] by 2H-TPP at the IL/Metal Interface
To further extend our understanding of the interaction of [C8C1Im][PF6] and 2H-TPP at the interfaces
of Ag(111) and Au(111), the order of the deposition process was reversed.
We first deposited 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at LT (80–84 K), followed by a single layer of 2H-TPP directly
on top of the IL layer, again at LT. This composite film was subsequently
heated to RT. XP spectra were measured after each preparation step.Figure shows the
F 1s, C 1s, and N 1s spectra at 80° for this deposition experiment
on Ag(111) at 84 K. Figure provides a scheme of the film structure at different stages
of this experiment. The F 1s spectrum in Figure II after deposition of the [C8C1Im][PF6] film (1 ML) shows the expected FPF6 peak of the [PF6]− anions.
In the C 1s spectrum, we find the Chetero and Calkyl peaks for the two carbon species in the [C8C1Im]+ cation with a ratio of Chetero/Calkyl of 0.64 in 80°, which is very close to the nominal ratio of
0.71 (=5:7). As reported earlier,[34,35] this contrasts
the behavior at RT[34,35,89,105] (see also Figure S1 in the Supporting Information) because for deposition at temperatures
around 85 K, the alkyl chain shows no preferential surface enrichment,
as sketched in Figure II. In the N 1s region, we observe one peak because of the two N
atoms of the imidazolium cation.
Figure 8
Spectra (80°) of F 1s, C 1s, and
N 1s core levels for (I)
clean Ag(111), (II) after deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 84 K, (III) after direct deposition
of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top at 84 K, and (IV) after heating to
RT. Color coding as in Figures and 6.
Figure 9
Scheme of the film structure in the heating experiment
after deposition
of a monolayer of 2H-TPP onto 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) at 84 K. The Roman numerals correspond to the
spectra shown in Figure .
Spectra (80°) of F 1s, C 1s, and
N 1s core levels for (I)
clean Ag(111), (II) after deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 84 K, (III) after direct deposition
of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top at 84 K, and (IV) after heating to
RT. Color coding as in Figures and 6.Scheme of the film structure in the heating experiment
after deposition
of a monolayer of 2H-TPP onto 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) at 84 K. The Roman numerals correspond to the
spectra shown in Figure .The spectra after deposition of 2H-TPP onto the
IL film at 84 K
in Figure III show
a pronounced attenuation of all IL-related XPS signals. We also find
two additional peaks in the N 1s and one in the C 1s spectrum related
to the two inequivalent nitrogen species and the carbon in 2H-TPP.
The spectra clearly indicate that the 2H-TPP molecules remain at the
vacuum interface at this LT and cover the IL film underneath; see Figure III.Upon heating
to RT, we observe several changes in the XP spectra
in Figure IV. All
IL-related contributions gain intensity—the Calkyl peak shows a particularly strong increase—whereas at the
same time, the 2H-TPPsignals decrease substantially. We attribute
these changes to the diffusion of 2H-TPP molecules to the Ag(111)
surface and replacement of the IL at the interface to the metal. As
a result, [C8C1Im][PF6] forms the
new IL/vacuum interface of the film; see Figure IV. Notably, at RT, the FPF6,
Ncation, and Chetero signals at 80° are
lower than they were in the spectra of the film of pure [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) at 84 K. This is due
to the strong enrichment of the alkyl chains at the vacuum interface
at RT, which is not observed after the deposition of the IL at 84
K, because of lack of mobility.[34,35] The ratio of Chetero/Calkyl of 0.41 at RT in Figure IV is similar to the value
of equally thick films of pure [C8C1Im][PF6] directly on Ag(111)34 (see also Figure S1 in
the Supporting Information).To further
elucidate this exchange process, we monitored the thermal
evolution of the F 1s and C 1s peak intensities by in situ temperature-programmed
XPS at 80° emission; see Figure . After the deposition of one layer of 2H-TPP on 1
ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 84 K, the
layered film was heated from 84 K to RT with a heating rate of 2 K/min.
All intensities remain constant up to about 215 K. Thereafter, the
FPF6signal increases by almost 70% until 255 K. Simultaneously,
the Calkyl signal of the [C8C1Im]+ cation also increases by more than 100%, whereas the porphyrin-related
C 1s contribution decreases to 40%. From this behavior, we conclude
that the exchange of the IL molecules by the 2H-TPP molecules at the
Ag(111) interface occurs at about 240 K.
Figure 10
Thermal evolution of
F 1s and C 1s spectra measured in 80°
during heating after deposition of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top of
1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111)
at 84 K. Heating rate: 2 K/min.
Thermal evolution of
F 1s and C 1s spectra measured in 80°
during heating after deposition of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top of
1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111)
at 84 K. Heating rate: 2 K/min.The main driving force for the exchange at the
metal interface
very likely is the considerably larger adsorption energy of 2H-TPP
on the metal surface compared to [C8C1Im][PF6]; the IL WL desorbs at around 445 K, whereas 2H-TPP does
not desorb until decomposition occurs at temperatures above 525 K.[9,122,123] For comparable exchange processes
between different ILs, involving [C8C1Im][PF6]/Ag(111),[34,35] the surface tension at the vacuum
interface was identified as one of the driving forces, and the other
main factor was the stronger adsorption of one of the ILs on the metal.
In the present case, no information on the surface tension of 2H-TPP
is available. In line with earlier studies on exchange processes in
organic bilayers,[10,27−30] it seems reasonable to assume
that the determining factor for the replacement of [C8C1Im][PF6] by 2H-TPP at the IL/metal interface is
the stronger binding of porphyrin to the metal surface.In our
previous temperature-dependent studies dealing with the
interdiffusion of [C8C1Im][PF6] with
other ILs in ultrathin films on Ag(111),[34,35] we observed the onsets of diffusion at temperatures slightly below
that of the bulk glass transition of [C8C1Im][PF6], which is at about 190 K.[153,154] The exchange
of [C8C1Im][PF6] by 2H-TPP on the
Ag(111) surface in the present experiment occurs at a temperature
that is about 50 K higher. This observation indicates that the exchange
process is determined rather by the properties of the porphyrin layer
at the vacuum interface, and not by the IL layer below, which should
have enough mobility already at a lower temperature. The delay of
the exchange process to considerably higher temperatures could result
from a change of the physicalbehavior of [C8C1Im][PF6]because of the confinement of the IL film under
the 2H-TPP layer, which itself is likely stabilized laterally by strong
phenyl–phenyl bonds.[96,97,122,123,132−139,155] Indeed, Chen et al. showed that
confinement of a closely related IL, [C4C1Im][PF6], in multiwalled carbon nanotubes led to a considerable increase
in the melting point of the IL, likely due to the formation of stable
hydrogen bond networks, where shorter than usual C–H–F
contacts can be formed.[156] Another possibility
for the shift of the transition to higher T could be the higher activation
energy. Because of the larger size of the porphyrin molecule, two
ion pairs need to be replaced at the IL/metal interface for one porphyrin
molecule instead of only one cation or anion (as in the case of the
previously mentioned IL/IL films on Ag(111)).[34,35]For the corresponding experiment on Au(111), we again monitor
the
F 1s, N 1s, and C 1ssignals at 80°; see Figure . After deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] on Au(111) at 80 K, the ratio of
Chetero/Calkyl of 0.63 in Figure II is again quite close to
the nominal ratio of 0.71 (=5:7). The spectra after the deposition
of a single layer of 2H-TPP on top of the IL film in Figure III show the porphyrin-related
N 1s and C 1s contributions in the expected quantities and a strong
attenuation of the IL signals, which again indicate that the porphyrin
molecules cover the IL film. Upon heating to RT, the IL-related peak
intensities in Figure IV increase again, whereas the porphyrinsignals lose intensity.
With a ratio of Chetero/Calkyl of 0.40 at RT,
the alkyl chain enrichment is similar to that on 2H-TPP-covered Ag(111)
and also to that of macroscopic films of [C8C1Im][PF6][34,157,158] (see also Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). We therefore conclude that on Au(111)also, the IL at the metal
surface is replaced by porphyrin upon heating to RT.
Figure 11
Spectra (80°) of
F 1s, C 1s, and N 1s core levels for (I)
clean Au(111), (II) after deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 80 K, (III) after direct deposition
of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top at 80 K, and (IV) after heating to
RT.
Spectra (80°) of
F 1s, C 1s, and N 1s core levels for (I)
clean Au(111), (II) after deposition of 1 ML of [C8C1Im][PF6] at 80 K, (III) after direct deposition
of a monolayer of 2H-TPP on top at 80 K, and (IV) after heating to
RT.
Summary and Conclusions
Studying the
interaction of the porphyrin 2H-TPP and the IL [C8C1Im][PF6] on Ag(111) and Au(111) by
ARXPS, we demonstrate for the first time that well-defined bilayered
porphyrin/IL film systems stable up to above 100 °C can be produced
on both metal surfaces by means of PVD under UHV conditions. Starting
with a monolayer of 2H-TPP, we observe the growth of a closed 2D [C8C1Im][PF6] WL on top of the 2H-TPP-covered
metal surfaces. Further IL deposition leads to the formation of 3D
islands on top of this WL; this Stranski–Kranstanov-like IL
growth behavior is less pronounced when [C8C1Im][PF6] is deposited directly on bare Ag(111) and Au(111).
Heating the bilayered IL/2H-TPP films to about 385 K does not lead
to film intermixing; above this temperature, the IL layer starts to
desorb. Similar to [C8C1Im][PF6]
multilayers, the IL on the 2H-TPP-covered metals desorbs entirely
below 425 K. This contrasts the situation on the bare Ag(111) and
Au(111) surfaces, where in the absence of 2H-TPP, a clear separation
between the desorption of the multilayers and the IL WL in direct
contact to the metal was observed. We assume that the porphyrin layer
decouples the IL from the metal surfaces, effectively inhibiting the
stronger specific adsorption of the ions. After IL desorption, the
2H-TPP layer remains on the surface. In contrast to Ag(111), we observe
signs of thermal decomposition of the IL on Au(111) and 2H-TPP/Au(111)
in the course of heating, leaving cation-related residuals behind.After deposition of 2H-TPP on top of a frozen film of [C8C1Im][PF6] at around 80 K, the 2H-TPP layer
covers the IL film below. Upon heating, the porphyrin molecules replace
the IL at the IL/metal interface at around 240 K. This exchange process
is most likely driven by the higher adsorption energy of 2H-TPP on
the Ag(111) and Au(111) surfaces as compared to the IL. With reference
to earlier studies,[34,35] we assume that this temperature
of 240 K is determined by the onset of mobility of the porphyrin layer.Our studies on the replacement of IL layers at the IL/metal interface
by postdeposition of porphyrins or comparable organic species are
highly relevant for the understanding of processes in the liquid phase.
In a way, our UHV-based experiment mimics preferential (selective)
adsorption of porphyrins on the corresponding substrates from a diluted
porphyrin solution. As the deposition from the liquid phase can follow
completely different mechanisms from the deposition from the gas phase,
the resulting surface structures of the porphyrin layer could be quite
different. Such replacement effects are closely related to stability
issues of IL-related catalytic systems: on the one hand, poisoning
of a SCILL catalyst through adsorption of molecular reagents similar
to 2H-TPP could irreversibly block the support surface and would lower
the effectivity of the catalyst over time, similar to poisoning of
Pt catalysts by sulfur or other nonreactive species.[159−162] On the other hand, SILP systems using catalytic centers based on
metalloporphyrin derivatives[18] could face
major challenges if the complexes preferentially adsorb to the support
surface and thus are depleted from the liquid phase. The system would
lose the characteristic homogeneous nature of the catalyst and possibly
diminish its reactivity/selectivity. From an even more general point
of view, the observed exchange is also relevant for the stability
of organic–organic heterostructures on solid supports. When
a device (like a porphyrin-based field-effect transistor) is prepared
at one temperature but used at higher temperatures, the increased
mobility of the molecules could change the intended structure/organization
of the layered film stack.
Authors: João P Leal; José M S S Esperança; Manuel E Minas da Piedade; José N Canongia Lopes; Luís P N Rebelo; Kenneth R Seddon Journal: J Phys Chem A Date: 2007-06-23 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Stefan Schernich; Mathias Laurin; Yaroslava Lykhach; Nataliya Tsud; Marek Sobota; Tomáš Skála; Kevin C Prince; Nicola Taccardi; Valentin Wagner; Hans-Peter Steinrück; Vladimír Matolín; Peter Wasserscheid; Jörg Libuda Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Knud Seufert; Willi Auwärter; F J García de Abajo; David Ecija; Saranyan Vijayaraghavan; Sushobhan Joshi; Johannes V Barth Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Stefan Schernich; Mathias Laurin; Yaroslava Lykhach; Hans-Peter Steinrück; Nataliya Tsud; Tomáš Skála; Kevin C Prince; Nicola Taccardi; Vladimír Matolín; Peter Wasserscheid; Jörg Libuda Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Wei Liu; Friedrich Maaß; Martin Willenbockel; Christopher Bronner; Michael Schulze; Serguei Soubatch; F Stefan Tautz; Petra Tegeder; Alexandre Tkatchenko Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 9.161