| Literature DB >> 31866753 |
Birendra Kumar Mishra1, Subrota Hati2, Sujit Das1, Jashbhai B Prajapati2.
Abstract
Different soybean products are considered as traditional functional food among the Mongolian population in Northeast India. In the present study, the effect of different flavours (mango, orange, vanilla and white rose), inoculation rates of Lactobacillus rhamnosus K4E (KX950834) and Lactobacillus helveticus K14 (KU644578), and mass fractions of skimmed milk and sugar on the acceptability of soy yoghurts was studied. Physicochemical (pH, titratable acidity) and microbial analyses (total bacterial, total coliform, yeast and mould count) were conducted, and organoleptic (aroma, taste, colour, mouthfeel, texture and overall acceptability) and biofunctional properties (angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and biotransformation of isoflavones) were evaluated during storage up to 10 days under refrigeration conditions (6-8 °C). Panellists preferred white rose soy yoghurt more than other flavours. The pH was from 5.65 to 4.20, the titratable acidity (expressed as mass fraction of lactic acid) was from 0.33 to 0.51% and total Lactobacillus count ranged from 6.81 to 8.69 log CFU/mL during storage. The ACE inhibitory activity increased from 21.17% on day 0 to 81.03% on day 5, followed by a decrease of the activity after 10 days (38.85%). The antioxidant activity was the highest on day 5 (87%). White rose soy yoghurt had the highest antimicrobial activity against Listeria monocytogenes, followed by Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi and Escherichia coli. RP-HPLC analysis showed that after 18 h, the production of soy isoflavone aglycones genistein and daidzein in yoghurt was 87.3 and 58.4%, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: ACE inhibitory activity; Lactobacillus sp; antimicrobial activity; antioxidant activity; isoflavones; soy yoghurt
Year: 2019 PMID: 31866753 PMCID: PMC6902289 DOI: 10.17113/ftb.57.03.19.6103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Technol Biotechnol ISSN: 1330-9862 Impact factor: 3.918
Formulation of different batches of soy yoghurt
| Batch | | | Food-grade | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | 2 | mango | 0.1 | 2 | 300 |
| 2 | 8 | 3 | mango | 0.2 | 2 | 300 |
| 3 | 9 | 4 | orange | 0.1 | 3 | 300 |
| 4 | 10 | 4 | orange | 0.2 | 3 | 300 |
| 5 | 10 | 5 | vanilla | 0.2 | 4 | 300 |
| 6 | 10 | 5 | white rose | 0.2 | 4 | 300 |
| 7 | 11 | 6 | vanilla | 0.3 | 5 | 300 |
| 8 | 11 | 6 | white rose | 0.3 | 5 | 300 |
The Lactobacillus culture consists of L. rhamnosus and L. helveticus in 1:1 ratio
Sensory scores of different white rose flavoured soy yoghurt batches used for the selection of optimal yoghurt formulation
| Parameter | Batch | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| Aroma | (3.64±0.101)a | (3.49±0.106)a | (5.00±0.085)c | (5.06±1.210)c | (4.21±0.262)b | (5.44±0.501)c | (6.18±0.552)d | (7.12±0.680)e |
| Taste | (4.06±0.150)b | (4.12±0.151)b | (4.83±0.125)b | (4.50±0.661)b | (4.13±0.520)b | (5.11±0.740)c | (6.11±0.056)d | (7.00±0.811)e |
| Colour | (4.11±0.172)b | (5.16±0.174)c | (4.44±0.874)b | (4.00±0.440)b | (4.06±0.403)b | (5.66±0.472)c | (6.05±0.224)d | (6.26±0.252)d |
| Mouthfeel | (3.32±0.091)a | (5.25± 0.092)c | (4.20±0.220)b | (5.66±0.370)c | (5.88±0.551)c | (5.70±0.055)c | (5.90±0.470)c | (7.06±0.334)e |
| Texture | (4.47±0.144)b | (5.32±0.147)c | (4.11±0.335)b | (5.16±0.348)c | (5.44±0.050)c | (5.35±0.420)c | (6.20±0.115)d | (6.50±0.440)d |
| Overall acceptability | (4.01±0.221)b | (5.11±0.224)c | (4.88±0.116)b | (5.05±0.217)c | (5.16±0.228)c | (5.88±0.505)c | (5.92±0.374)c | (7.33±0.177)e |
Description of batches is given in Table 1. Values are mean±S.D. of eight independent determinations of each sample. Values with different letters in superscript in each column differ significantly (p<0.05)
Sensory scores of optimized white rose flavoured soy yoghurt during storage for 10 days
| Parameter | | Sensory score |
|---|---|---|
| Aroma | 1 | (7.3±0.7)a |
| 4 | (7.8±0.9)d | |
| 7 | (7.4±0.2)c | |
| 10 | (6.4±0.7)b | |
| Taste | 1 | (7.3±0.5)a |
| 4 | (7.4±0.2)c | |
| 7 | (7.2±0.6)a | |
| 10 | (6.2±0.4)b | |
| Colour | 1 | (7.0±0.7)b |
| 4 | (7.4±0.7)c | |
| 7 | (7.2±0.8)a | |
| 10 | (6.7±0.3)b | |
| Mouthfeel | 1 | (7.3±0.1)a |
| 4 | (7.4±0.9)c | |
| 7 | (7.2±0.7)a | |
| 10 | (6.9±0.6)b | |
| Texture | 1 | (7.3±0.1)c |
| 4 | (7.6±0.9)d | |
| 7 | (7.2±0.7)a | |
| 10 | (6.5±0.5)b | |
| Overall acceptability | 1 | (7.1±0.9)a |
| 4 | (7.4±0.6)c | |
| 7 | (7.2±0.7)a | |
| 10 | (6.3±0.5)b |
Values are mean±S.D. of triplicate determinations. Values with different letters in superscript in each column differ significantly (p<0.05)
Physicochemical analysis of optimized white rose flavoured soy yoghurt during storage
| | pH | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | (5.65±0.01)a | (0.33±0.04)a |
| 4 | (4.54±0.05)b | (0.46±0.03)b |
| 7 | (4.37±0.02)b | (0.48±0.02)b |
| 10 | (4.20±0.02)b | (0.51±0.06)c |
Values are mean±S.D. of three independent determinations of each sample. Values with different letters in superscript in each column differ significantly (p<0.05)
Fig. 1Microbial analysis of white rose flavoured soy yoghurt during storage for 10 days. Error bars show standard deviation (N=3); p<0.05
Fig. 2Activities of white rose flavoured soy yoghurt fermented by Lactobacillus cultures during 10 days of storage: a) ACE inhibitory activity, with the highest ACE inhibition clearly visible on day 5, and b) antimicrobial activity against different test organisms. Error bars show standard deviation (N=3); p<0.05
Antioxidant activity of white rose flavoured soy yoghurt during storage
| | | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 120 | 150 | 180 | 210 | 240 | 270 | 300 | |
| Antioxidant activity/% | |||||||||||
| 0 | (57.42 | (71.00 | (74.00 | (76.71 | (78.57 ±0.04)c | (80.42 ±0.07)f | (81.71 | (83.0 | (83.85 ±0.01)f | (84.28 | (85.02 |
| 2 | (57.57 ±0.04)a | (72.14 | (74.71 | (77.85 ±0.02)c | (79.71 ±0.02)c | (81.42 ±0.02)f | (82.85 | (83.42 | (83.85 | (84.85 | (86.02 |
| 5 | (59.28 | (69.0 | (74.85 | (77.14 | (80.00 ±0.03)c | (81.71 ±0.03)f | (82.71 | (84.00 | (84.71 | (85.42 | (87.00 |
| 8 | (52.28 | (69.42 | (73.57 | (76.42 | (77.71 ±0.02)c | (78.71 ±0.02)c | (79.28 | (79.85 | (80.28 | (81.00 | (82.06 |
| 10 | (41.14 | (56.14 | (61.28 | (64.85 | (67.00 ±0.06)d | (68.85 ±0.07)d | (70.14 | (71.28 | (72.14± | (72.85 | (78.12 |
Values are mean±S.D. of three independent determinations of each sample. Values with different letters in superscript in each column differ significantly (p<0.05)
Fig. 3Biotransformation of isoflavones in: a) unfermented soy milk [1=daidzein (34.4%), 2=genistein (30.6%)], and b) fermented white rose flavoured soy yoghurt [1=daidzein (58.4%), 2=genistein (87.3%)]