| Literature DB >> 31866752 |
Tábita Veiga Dias Rodrigues1, Thalita D Amore1, Erika Carvalho Teixeira1, Janaina Fernandes de Medeiros Burkert1.
Abstract
<span class="Chemical">Carotenoidsn> are natural pigments that can be produced through biotechnological processes. However, the costs are relatively high and can be minimized by using lower-cost substrates as alternative nutrient sources. The fed-ba<span class="Chemical">tch fermentation is one of the techniques used to obtain a high biomass concentration and/or maximum production. Thus, the aim of this work is to produce <span class="Chemical">carotenoids in batch and fed-batch fermentation with the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa CCT 7688 using agroindustrial byproducts in the culture medium. Carotenoid production was increased using experimental designs, which modified the concentration of the agroindustrial medium. In batch production the highest concentrations of total carotenoids (1248.5 μg/L) and biomass (7.9 g/L) were obtained in the medium containing 70 g/L sugar cane molasses and 3.4 g/L corn steep liquor at 25 °C and 180 rpm in 168 h, demonstrating an increase of 17% when compared to the standard yeast malt medium (1200 μg/L). In the fed-batch production, different feeding strategies were tested with 30 g/L sugar cane molasses and 6.5 g/L corn steep liquor, reaching a total carotenoid production of 3726 μg/L and biomass concentration of 16 g/L. Therefore, the strategy of the fed-batch process resulted in an increase in the carotenoid production of approx. 400% compared to that in the batch process (740.3 μg/L). Thus, the R. mucilaginosa strain has the potential to produce carotenoids in agroindustrial medium.Entities:
Keywords: corn steep liquor; feeding strategies; sugar cane molasses; yeast; β-carotene
Year: 2019 PMID: 31866752 PMCID: PMC6902290 DOI: 10.17113/ftb.57.03.19.6068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Technol Biotechnol ISSN: 1330-9862 Impact factor: 3.918
Partial characterization of substrates, C:N ratio, carotenoid production by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and productivity in different culture media at 25 °C, initial pH=6.0 and 180 rpm
| Substrate | | | C:N ratio | | | | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N | H | ||||||||
| CSL* | 17.83 | 3.80 | 2.41 | CSL 36.5 +SCM 6.0 | 6.04 | (96.4±9.8)a | (336±10)a | (4.5±1.1)a | (0.10±0.01)a | (14.0±0.4)a |
| SCM | 31.47 | 0.04 | - | |||||||
| RG | 31.50 | <0.07 | 2.27 | CSL 35.6 +RG 6.6 | 6.20 | (78.7±7.2)a | (297±15)b | (4.2±0.4)b | (0.07±0.00)b | (6.2±0.7)b |
| Yeast extract | 41.26 | 11.45 | 5.35 | |||||||
| Malt extract | 42.11 | 1.41 | 5.42 | YM | 8.28 | 176.3±4.5 | 1200±75 | 7.1±0.3 | 0.080±0.004 | 15.1±2.1 |
| Peptone | 12.16 | 2.70 | 1.46 | |||||||
CSL=corn steep liquor, SCM=sugar cane molasses, RG=raw glycerol, YM=yeast malt medium; *composition according to Cipolatti (); wSC=specific carotenoid mass fraction, γVC=volumetric carotenoid concentration, rb=biomass productivity and rvc=volumetric carotenoid productivity, expressed as mean value±standard deviation (N=3); different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference (p<0.05) according to Student’s t-test
Coded levels and real values (in parentheses) of the first and second central composite design (CCD 22) used for batch carotenoid production on agroindustrial media
| First central composite design | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assay | X1 | X2 | R1 | R2 | | R3 | R4 | R5 | |||
| 1 | -1 (10) | -1 (3.5) | 2.6 | 479 | 168 | 177.9 | 0.0 | 27.5 | |||
| 2 | +1 (50) | -1 (3.5) | 8.7 | 1040 | 144 | 119.2 | 5.1 | 106.9 | |||
| 3 | -1 (10) | +1 (9.5) | 3.1 | 407 | 120 | 128.0 | 0.0 | 13.2 | |||
| 4 | +1 (50) | +1 (9.5) | 7.2 | 1077 | 168 | 149.3 | 3.5 | 45.7 | |||
| 5 | 0 (30) | 0 (6.5) | 7.2 | 80 | 144 | 110.8 | 1.6 | 42.0 | |||
| 6 | 0 (30) | 0 (6.5) | 5.8 | 74 | 168 | 127.3 | 1.3 | 42.0 | |||
| 7 | 0 (30) | 0 (6.5) | 5.1 | 670 | 144 | 130.4 | 1.76 | 42.0 | |||
| Second central composite design | |||||||||||
| Assay | X1 | X2 | R1 | DR1 | R2 | | DR2 | R3 | DR3 | R4 | R5 |
| 1 | -1 (50) | -1 (0.58) | 4.88 | 8.20 | 623 | 168 | 9.31 | 127.71 | 7.17 | 4.86 | 370.14 |
| 2 | +1 (70) | -1 (0.58) | 6.74 | 0.89 | 909 | 144 | 8.14 | 134.98 | 1.57 | 15.66 | 435.75 |
| 3 | -1 (50) | +1 (3.41) | 7.17 | 0.98 | 1077 | 168 | 6.87 | 163.62 | 6.50 | 3.14 | 109.26 |
| 4 | +1 (70) | +1 (3.41) | 8.10 | 4.94 | 1404 | 168 | 3.49 | 173.39 | 0.35 | 12.69 | 143.65 |
| 5 | 0 (60) | 0 (2) | 7.28 | 5.36 | 1209 | 168 | 11.75 | 166.15 | 6.72 | 4.57 | 192.39 |
| 6 | 0 (60) | 0 (2) | 7.07 | 2.55 | 1104 | 168 | 3.35 | 156.22 | 0.74 | 3.67 | 192.39 |
| 7 | 0 (60) | 0 (2) | 6.98 | 1.29 | 1141 | 168 | 6.49 | 165.61 | 6.15 | 3.55 | 192.39 |
X1=γ(SCM)/g/L, X2=γ(CSL)/(g/L), R1=γ(biomass)/(g/L), R2=γVC/(µg/L), R3=wSC/(µg/g), R4=γ(total reducing sugar)/(g/L) and R5=C:N ratio (for abbreviations see legend of Table 1); DR1=relative deviation of biomass concentration, DR2=relative deviation of volumetric carotenoid concentration and DR3=relative deviation of specific carotenoids; t=time of cultivation needed for maximum volumetric production of carotenoids
Fig. 1Effects of the variables of sugar cane molasses (SCM) and corn steep liquor (CSL) on the responses of volumetric carotenoid (VC) concentration, specific carotenoid (SC) mass fraction, biomass concentration, total reducing sugars and C:N ratio in the first central composite design (CCD). *significantly different (p<0.05)
Fig. 2Contour curves of: a) volumetric carotenoid concentration, b) biomass concentration obtained by CCD and c) specific carotenoid concentration as a function of the corn steep liquor (CSL) and sugar cane molasses (SCM) concentrations
Fig. 3Kinetics of the carotenoid production by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa at 25 °C, 180 rpm and an initial pH=6.0: a) γ(sugar cane molasses)=70 g/L and γ(corn steep liquor)=3.4 g/L used to validate the empirical models (N=3), b) γ(sugar cane molasses)=30 g/L and γ(corn steep liquor)=6.5 g/L in a fed-batch fermentation at feeding time t=96 h
Biomass concentration and carotenoid production on agroindustrial media in batch and fed-batch fermentation with different feeding strategies
| Trial | | Process | Feeding pulse | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CSL 3.4+SCM 70 | Batch | - | (7.9±0.9)b | (152±13)a | (1248± 94)c | 144 |
| 2 | Fed-batch | 50 | (13.7±1.2)a | (139±22)a | (2229±1534)b | 192 | |
| 3 | CSL 6.5+SCM 30 | Batch | - | (6.0±0.8)b | (123±9)a | (740±55)d | 144 |
| 4 | Fed-batch | 25 | (16.1±4.5)a | (118.8±13.7)a | (3726.7±506.0)a | 192 |
CSL=corn steep liquor, SCM=sugar cane molasses; wSC=specific mass fraction of carotenoids, γVC=volumetric concentration of carotenoids, tc=time of cultivation; different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference (p<0.05) according to Tukey’s test
Fig. 4Comparison of: a) biomass concentration in batch and fed-batch fermentations with 6.5 g/L corn steep liquor and 30 g/L sugar cane molasses medium, b) volumetric concentration of carotenoids and c) specific carotenoid mass fraction. B=batch process, fed–batch run (t/h): 1) 48, 2) 72, 3) 96, 4) 48 and 96, 5) 72 and 120, 6) 96 and 144, 7) 96 and 168. The results are expressed as mean values±standard deviations (N=3); different letters (lowercase for biomass and volumetric carotenoid concentrations and uppercase for biomass and volumetric carotenoid productivity) indicate a significant difference (p<0.05) according to Tukey’s test
Carotenoid production obtained by cultivation of red yeasts on different substrates and operating conditions
| Strain | Substrate | Operating conditions | Cultivation method | | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Sugar cane molasses | Incubated in a shake flask at 25 °C, 180 rpm and initial pH=6.0 | Batch | 1248.5 | This work |
| | Sugar cane molasses | Incubated in a shake flask at 25 °C, 180 rpm and initial pH=6.0 | Fed-batch | 3726.0 | This work |
| | Crude glycerol, maceration water and rice parboiling water | Stirred tank bioreactor at 25 °C, initial pH=4.0 and 180 rpm | Batch | 7388.0 | ( |
| | Wastewater food industry | Incubated in a shake flask at 25 °C,115 rpm and initial pH=5.5 | Batch | 1200.0 | ( |
| | Sugar cane molasses | Stirred tank bioreactor at 25 °C, initial pH=6.0, and 158 rpm | Batch | 1969.3 | ( |
| | Sugar cane molasses | Incubated in a shake flask at 27.5 °C, 150 rpm and initial pH=4.0 | Batch | 565.0 | ( |
| | Glycerol | Stirred tank bioreactor at 25 °C, 180 rpm and initial pH=4.0 | Fed-batch | 4400.0 | ( |