Federico Storni1, Andris Zeltins2, Ina Balke2, Matthew D Heath3, Matthias F Kramer3, Murray A Skinner3, Lisha Zha4, Elisa Roesti5, Paul Engeroff5, Lukas Muri6, Diego von Werdt7, Thomas Gruber7, Mark Cragg8, Malgorzata Mlynarczyk9, Thomas M Kündig10, Monique Vogel5, Martin F Bachmann11. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: federico.storni@insel.ch. 2. Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia. 3. Allergy Therapeutics (UK) Ltd, Worthing, United Kingdom. 4. International Immunology Center of Anhui Agricultural Center, Anhui, China. 5. Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 6. Neuroinfection Laboratory, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 7. Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 8. Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom. 9. IZZ Immunologie-Zentrum Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. 10. Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 11. Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: martin.bachmann@me.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a severe and increasingly frequent disease with high medical, psychosocial, and economic burden for affected patients and wider society. A causal, safe, and effective therapy is not yet available. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop an immunogenic, protective, and nonreactogenic vaccine candidate against peanut allergy based on virus-like particles (VLPs) coupled to single peanut allergens. METHODS: To generate vaccine candidates, extracts of roasted peanut (Ara R) or the single allergens Ara h 1 or Ara h 2 were coupled to immunologically optimized Cucumber Mosaic Virus-derived VLPs (CuMVtt). BALB/c mice were sensitized intraperitoneally with peanut extract absorbed to alum. Immunotherapy consisted of a single subcutaneous injection of CuMVtt coupled to Ara R, Ara h 1, or Ara h 2. RESULTS: The vaccines CuMVtt-Ara R, CuMVtt-Ara h 1, and CuMVtt-Ara h 2 protected peanut-sensitized mice against anaphylaxis after intravenous challenge with the whole peanut extract. Vaccines did not cause allergic reactions in sensitized mice. CuMVtt-Ara h 1 was able to induce specific IgG antibodies, diminished local reactions after skin prick tests, and reduced the infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract by eosinophils and mast cells after oral challenge with peanut. The ability of CuMVtt-Ara h 1 to protect against challenge with the whole extract was mediated by IgG, as shown via passive IgG transfer. FcγRIIb was required for protection, indicating that immune complexes with single allergens were able to block the allergic response against the whole extract, consisting of a complex allergen mixture. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that vaccination using single peanut allergens displayed on CuMVtt may represent a novel therapy against peanut allergy with a favorable safety profile.
BACKGROUND:Peanutallergy is a severe and increasingly frequent disease with high medical, psychosocial, and economic burden for affected patients and wider society. A causal, safe, and effective therapy is not yet available. OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop an immunogenic, protective, and nonreactogenic vaccine candidate against peanutallergy based on virus-like particles (VLPs) coupled to single peanut allergens. METHODS: To generate vaccine candidates, extracts of roasted peanut (Ara R) or the single allergens Ara h 1 or Ara h 2 were coupled to immunologically optimized Cucumber Mosaic Virus-derived VLPs (CuMVtt). BALB/c mice were sensitized intraperitoneally with peanut extract absorbed to alum. Immunotherapy consisted of a single subcutaneous injection of CuMVtt coupled to Ara R, Ara h 1, or Ara h 2. RESULTS: The vaccines CuMVtt-Ara R, CuMVtt-Ara h 1, and CuMVtt-Ara h 2 protected peanut-sensitized mice against anaphylaxis after intravenous challenge with the whole peanut extract. Vaccines did not cause allergic reactions in sensitized mice. CuMVtt-Ara h 1 was able to induce specific IgG antibodies, diminished local reactions after skin prick tests, and reduced the infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract by eosinophils and mast cells after oral challenge with peanut. The ability of CuMVtt-Ara h 1 to protect against challenge with the whole extract was mediated by IgG, as shown via passive IgG transfer. FcγRIIb was required for protection, indicating that immune complexes with single allergens were able to block the allergic response against the whole extract, consisting of a complex allergen mixture. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that vaccination using single peanut allergens displayed on CuMVtt may represent a novel therapy against peanutallergy with a favorable safety profile.
Authors: Ludger Klimek; Oliver Pfaar; Margitta Worm; Karl-Christian Bergmann; Thomas Bieber; Roland Buhl; Jeroen Buters; Ulf Darsow; Thomas Keil; Jörg Kleine-Tebbe; Susanne Lau; Marcus Maurer; Hans Merk; Ralph Mösges; Joachim Saloga; Petra Staubach; Dagmar Poethig; Klaus Rabe; Uta Rabe; Claus Vogelmeier; Tilo Biedermann; Kirsten Jung; Wolfgang Schlenter; Johannes Ring; Adam Chaker; Wolfgang Wehrmann; Sven Becker; Norbert Mülleneisen; Katja Nemat; Wolfgang Czech; Holger Wrede; Randolf Brehler; Thomas Fuchs; Peter-Valentin Tomazic; Werner Aberer; Antje Fink-Wagner; Friedrich Horak; Stefan Wöhrl; Verena Niederberger-Leppin; Isabella Pali-Schöll; Wolfgang Pohl; Regina Roller-Wirnsberger; Otto Spranger; Rudolf Valenta; Mübecell Akdis; Cezmi Akdis; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Marek Jutel; Paolo Matricardi; François Spertini; Nikolai Khaltaev; Jean-Pierre Michel; Laurent Nicod; Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier; Eckard Hamelmann; Thilo Jakob; Thomas Werfel; Martin Wagenmann; Christian Taube; Jean Bousquet; Torsten Zuberbier; Christian Vogelberg; Michael Gerstlauer Journal: Allergo J Date: 2020-05-08
Authors: Matthew D Heath; Mona O Mohsen; Pieter-Jan de Kam; Thalia L Carreno Velazquez; Simon J Hewings; Matthias F Kramer; Thomas M Kündig; Martin F Bachmann; Murray A Skinner Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Cristobalina Mayorga; Francisca Palomares; José A Cañas; Natalia Pérez-Sánchez; Rafael Núñez; María José Torres; Francisca Gómez Journal: Foods Date: 2021-05-10
Authors: Inna Tulaeva; Bernhard Kratzer; Raffaela Campana; Mirela Curin; Marianne van Hage; Antonina Karsonova; Ksenja Riabova; Alexander Karaulov; Musa Khaitov; Winfried F Pickl; Rudolf Valenta Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Ludger Klimek; Marek Jutel; Cezmi Akdis; Jean Bousquet; Mübeccel Akdis; Claus Bachert; Ioana Agache; Ignacio Ansotegui; Anna Bedbrook; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich; Giorgio W Canonica; Tomas Chivato; Alvaro A Cruz; Wienia Czarlewski; Stefano Del Giacco; Hui Du; Joao A Fonseca; Yadong Gao; Tari Haahtela; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Juan-Carlos Ivancevich; Nikolai Khaltaev; Edward F Knol; Piotr Kuna; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Erik Melen; Joaquim Mullol; Robert Naclerio; Ken Ohta; Yoshitaka Okamoto; Liam O'Mahony; Gabrielle L Onorato; Nikos G Papadopoulos; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Boleslaw Samolinski; Jurgen Schwarze; Sanna Toppila-Salmi; Mohamed H Shamji; Maria Teresa Ventura; Arunas Valiulis; Arzu Yorgancioglu; Paolo Matricardi; Torsten Zuberbier Journal: Allergy Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 14.710