| Literature DB >> 31866229 |
Kathryn Ducharlet1, Jennifer Philip2, Hilton Gock3, Mark Brown4, Samantha L Gelfand5, Elizabeth A Josland4, Frank Brennan4.
Abstract
Moral distress occurs when individuals are unable to act in accordance with what they believe to be ethically correct or just. It results from a discrepancy between a clinician's perception of "the right thing to do" and what is actually happening and is perpetuated by perceived constraints that limit the individual from speaking up or enacting change. Moral distress is reported by many clinicians in caring for patients with serious illness, including chronic kidney disease and kidney failure. If left unidentified, unexpressed, or unaddressed, moral distress may cause burnout, exhaustion, detachment, and ineffectiveness. At an extreme, moral distress may lead to a desire to abandon the speciality entirely. This article offers an international perspective on moral distress in nephrology in diverse contexts and health care systems. We examine and discuss the sociocultural factors that contribute to moral distress in nephrology and offer suggestions for interventions from individual provider, facility, and health care systems perspectives to reduce the impact of moral distress on nephrology providers.Entities:
Keywords: Moral distress; clinical ethics; conservative care; end-of-life care; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); ethics; job satisfaction; kidney failure; medical decision making; nephrology; physician burnout; review
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31866229 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Kidney Dis ISSN: 0272-6386 Impact factor: 8.860