Literature DB >> 31866164

Selective peak inference: Unbiased estimation of raw and standardized effect size at local maxima.

Samuel Davenport1, Thomas E Nichols2.   

Abstract

The spatial signals in neuroimaging mass univariate analyses can be characterized in a number of ways, but one widely used approach is peak inference: the identification of peaks in the image. Peak locations and magnitudes provide a useful summary of activation and are routinely reported, however, the magnitudes reflect selection bias as these points have both survived a threshold and are local maxima. In this paper we propose the use of resampling methods to estimate and correct this bias in order to estimate both the raw units change as well as standardized effect size measured with Cohen's d and partial R2. We evaluate our method with a massive open dataset, and discuss how the corrected estimates can be used to perform power analyses. Keywords: fMRI, selective inference, winner's curse, regression to the mean, bias, bootstrap, local maxima, UK biobank, power analyses, massive linear modeling.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31866164     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  2 in total

Review 1.  Avoiding pitfalls: Bayes factors can be a reliable tool for post hoc data selection in implicit learning.

Authors:  M Leganes-Fonteneau; R Scott; T Duka; Z Dienes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-25

2.  Anxiety and the Neurobiology of Temporally Uncertain Threat Anticipation.

Authors:  Juyoen Hur; Jason F Smith; Kathryn A DeYoung; Allegra S Anderson; Jinyi Kuang; Hyung Cho Kim; Rachael M Tillman; Manuel Kuhn; Andrew S Fox; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.