Literature DB >> 31866145

Single-stage bone resection and cranioplastic reconstruction: comparison of a novel software-derived PEEK workflow with the standard reconstructive method.

Philippe Dodier1, Fabian Winter1, Thomas Auzinger2, Gabriel Mistelbauer3, Josa M Frischer1, Wei-Te Wang1, Ammar Mallouhi4, Wolfgang Marik4, Stefan Wolfsberger1, Lukas Reissig5, Firas Hammadi6, Christian Matula1, Arnulf Baumann7, Gerhard Bavinzski1.   

Abstract

The combined resection of skull-infiltrating tumours and immediate cranioplastic reconstruction predominantly relies on freehand-moulded solutions. Techniques that enable this procedure to be performed easily in routine clinical practice would be useful. A cadaveric study was developed in which a new software tool was used to perform single-stage reconstructions with prefabricated implants after the resection of skull-infiltrating pathologies. A novel 3D visualization and interaction framework was developed to create 10 virtual craniotomies in five cadaveric specimens. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants were manufactured according to the bone defects. The image-guided craniotomy was reconstructed with PEEK and compared to polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Navigational accuracy and surgical precision were assessed. The PEEK workflow resulted in up to 10-fold shorter reconstruction times than the standard technique. Surgical precision was reflected by the mean 1.1±0.29mm distance between the virtual and real craniotomy, with submillimetre precision in 50%. Assessment of the global offset between virtual and actual craniotomy revealed an average shift of 4.5±3.6mm. The results validated the 'elective single-stage cranioplasty' technique as a state-of-the-art virtual planning method and surgical workflow. This patient-tailored workflow could significantly reduce surgical times compared to the traditional, intraoperative acrylic moulding method and may be an option for the reconstruction of bone defects in the craniofacial region.
Copyright © 2019 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PEEK; navigation-guided surgery; patient-specific implant; single-stage craniofacial reconstruction; virtual craniotomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31866145     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  3 in total

1.  Automated Implant Resizing for Single-Stage Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Shuya Liu; Wei-Lun Huang; Chad Gordon; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 2.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Patient-specific PEEK implants for immediate restoration of temporal fossa after maxillary reconstruction with temporalis muscle flap.

Authors:  Sherif Ali; Omniya Abdel Aziz; Mamdouh Ahmed
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-05-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.