Literature DB >> 31866118

What do we know about the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint and of sacropelvic fixation? A literature review.

Gloria Casaroli1, Tito Bassani2, Marco Brayda-Bruno3, Andrea Luca4, Fabio Galbusera5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to summarize the general knowledge about the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint and sacropelvic fixation techniques. Additionally, this study aims to support biomechanical investigations in defining experimental protocols as well as numerical modeling of the sacropelvic structures. The sacroiliac joint is characterized by a large variability of shape and ranges of motion among individuals. Although the ligament network and the anatomical features strongly limit the joint movements, sacroiliac displacements and rotations are not negligible. Currently available treatments for sacroiliac joint dysfunction include physical therapy, steroid injections, Radio-frequency ablation of specific neural structures, and open or minimally invasive SIJ fusion. In long posterior construct, the most common solutions are the iliac screws and the S2 alar - iliac screws, whereas for the joint fixation alone, mini - invasive alternative system can be used. Several studies reported the clinical outcomes of the different techniques and investigated the biomechanical stability of the relative construct, but the effect of sacropelvic fixation techniques on the joint flexibility and on the stress generated into the bone is still unknown. In our opinion, more biomechanical analyses on the behavior of the sacroiliac joint may be performed in order to better predict the risk of failure or instability of the joint.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Experimental studies; Finite element analysis; Long-posterior fixation; Sacralpelvic fixation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31866118     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  4 in total

1.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mayank Aranke; Grace McCrudy; Kelsey Rooney; Kunaal Patel; Christopher A Lee; Jamal Hasoon; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Does the anterior column realignment technique influences the stresses on posterior instrumentation in sagittal imbalance correction? A biomechanical, finite-element analysis of L5-S1 ALIF and L3-4 lateral ACR.

Authors:  Matteo Panico; Marco Bertoli; Tomaso Maria Tobia Villa; Fabio Galbusera; Matteo Messori; Giovanni Andrea La Maida; Bernardo Misaggi; Enrico Gallazzi
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-08-23

4.  Revision by S2-alar-iliac instrumentation reduces caudal screw loosening while improving sacroiliac joint pain-a group comparison study.

Authors:  Sandro M Krieg; Nico Sollmann; Sebastian Ille; Lucia Albers; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.