Literature DB >> 31865918

UGM: a more stable procedure for large-scale multiple testing problems, new solutions to identify oncogene.

Chengyou Liu1, Leilei Zhou1, Yuhe Wang1, Shuchang Tian1, Junlin Zhu2, Hang Qin1, Yong Ding3,4, Hongbing Jiang5,6.   

Abstract

Variations of gene expression levels play an important role in tumors. There are numerous methods to identify differentially expressed genes in high-throughput sequencing. Several algorithms endeavor to identify distinctive genetic patterns susceptable to particular diseases. Although these processes have been proved successful, the probability that the number of non-differentially expressed genes measured by false discovery rate (FDR) has a large standard deviation, and the misidentification rate (type I error) grows rapidly when the number of genes to be detected become larger. In this study we developed a new method, Unit Gamma Measurement (UGM), accounting for multiple hypotheses test statistics distribution, which could reduce the dependency problem. Simulated expression profile data and breast cancer RNA-Seq data were utilized to testify the accuracy of UGM. The results show that the number of non-differentially expressed genes identified by the UGM is very close to the real-evidence data, and the UGM also has a smaller standard error, range, quartile range and RMS error. In addition, the UGM can be used to screen many breast cancer-associated genes, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN, BRIP1, etc., provides better accuracy, robustness and efficiency, the method of identification differentially expressed genes in high-throughput sequencing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer-associated genes; Differentially expressed genes; False discovery rate; RNA-Seq data; Root mean square error; Standard deviation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865918      PMCID: PMC6927121          DOI: 10.1186/s12976-019-0117-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model        ISSN: 1742-4682            Impact factor:   2.432


  23 in total

1.  The code structure of the p53 DNA-binding domain and the prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Keiko Sato; Toshihide Hara; Masanori Ohya
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Impaired fetal muscle development and JAK-STAT activation mark disease onset and progression in a mouse model for merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Andreia M Nunes; Ryan D Wuebbles; Apurva Sarathy; Tatiana M Fontelonga; Marianne Deries; Dean J Burkin; Sólveig Thorsteinsdóttir
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  The expression and function of hsp30-like small heat shock protein genes in amphibians, birds, fish, and reptiles.

Authors:  John J Heikkila
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.320

Review 4.  ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology.

Authors:  Peter J Park
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles--database and tools.

Authors:  Tanya Barrett; Tugba O Suzek; Dennis B Troup; Stephen E Wilhite; Wing-Chi Ngau; Pierre Ledoux; Dmitry Rudnev; Alex E Lash; Wataru Fujibuchi; Ron Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Tumor-derived CXCL5 promotes human colorectal cancer metastasis through activation of the ERK/Elk-1/Snail and AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin pathways.

Authors:  Jingkun Zhao; Baochi Ou; Dingpei Han; Puxiongzhi Wang; Yaping Zong; Congcong Zhu; Di Liu; Minhua Zheng; Jing Sun; Hao Feng; Aiguo Lu
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Author Correction: BRCA1-regulated RRM2 expression protects glioblastoma cells from endogenous replication stress and promotes tumorigenicity.

Authors:  Rikke D Rasmussen; Madhavsai K Gajjar; Lucie Tuckova; Kamilla E Jensen; Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Camilla B Holst; Kjeld Møllgård; Jane S Rasmussen; Jannick Brennum; Jiri Bartek; Martin Syrucek; Eva Sedlakova; Klaus K Andersen; Marie H Frederiksen; Jiri Bartek; Petra Hamerlik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

9.  Loss of the BRCA1-interacting helicase BRIP1 results in abnormal mammary acinar morphogenesis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Daino; Tatsuhiko Imaoka; Takamitsu Morioka; Shusuke Tani; Daisuke Iizuka; Mayumi Nishimura; Yoshiya Shimada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Tumor-Associated Variant RAD51 G151D Induces a Hyper-Recombination Phenotype.

Authors:  Carolyn G Marsden; Ryan B Jensen; Jennifer Zagelbaum; Eli Rothenberg; Scott W Morrical; Susan S Wallace; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.