Literature DB >> 31865845

Cut points of the Actigraph GT9X for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity at four different wear locations.

Matthew B Rhudy1, Scott B Dreisbach2, Matthew D Moran2, Marissa J Ruggiero2, Praveen Veerabhadrappa2.   

Abstract

Accelerometer cut points are an important consideration for distinguishing the intensity of activity into categories such as moderate and vigorous. It is well-established in the literature that these cut points depend on a variety of factors, including age group, device, and wear location. The Actigraph GT9X is a newer model accelerometer that is used for physical activity research, but existing cut points for this device are limited since it is a newer device. Furthermore, there is not existing data on cut points for the GT9X at the ankle or foot locations, which offers some potential benefit for activities that do not involve arm and/or core motion. A total of N = 44 adults completed a four-stage treadmill protocol while wearing Actigraph GT9X sensors at four different locations: foot, ankle, wrist, and hip. Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) levels assessed by indirect calorimetry along with Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish cut points for moderate and vigorous intensity for each wear location of the GT9X. Area under the ROC curves indicated high discrimination accuracy for each case.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; calibration; cut points; physical activity; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865845     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1707956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  10 in total

1.  A Comparative Study on the Suitability and Treatment Compliance of an Improved Wristband Wearing Method Compared with the Traditional Method.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Xiaoyan Zhao; Jing Huang; Xiaoyu Cao; Shibo Pan; Hua Jin
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Six nights of sleep extension increases regional cerebral oxygenation without modifying cognitive performance at rest or following acute aerobic exercise.

Authors:  Cayla Clark; Eric Rivas; Joaquin U Gonzales
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.296

3.  Reliability Study of Inertial Sensors LIS2DH12 Compared to ActiGraph GT9X: Based on Free Code.

Authors:  Jaime Martín-Martín; Ariadna Jiménez-Partinen; Irene De-Torres; Adrian Escriche-Escuder; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Muro-Culebras; Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Fermín Mayoral-Cleries; Attila Biró; Wen Tang; Borjanka Nikolova; Alfredo Salvatore; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-05

4.  The Validity of MotionSense HRV in Estimating Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity under Free-Living and Simulated Activity Settings.

Authors:  Sunku Kwon; Neng Wan; Ryan D Burns; Timothy A Brusseau; Youngwon Kim; Santosh Kumar; Emre Ertin; David W Wetter; Cho Y Lam; Ming Wen; Wonwoo Byun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults Using Wrist Accelerometers.

Authors:  Fangyu Liu; Amal A Wanigatunga; Jennifer A Schrack
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.280

6.  Time spent in hypoglycemia is comparable when the same amount of exercise is performed 5 or 2 days weekly: a randomized crossover study in people with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Isabelle Isa Kristin Steineck; Ajenthen G Ranjan; Signe Schmidt; Kirsten Norgaard
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-01

7.  Measuring Criterion Validity of Microinteraction Ecological Momentary Assessment (Micro-EMA): Exploratory Pilot Study With Physical Activity Measurement.

Authors:  Aditya Ponnada; Binod Thapa-Chhetry; Justin Manjourides; Stephen Intille
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Connectedness to Nature Does Not Explain the Variation in Physical Activity and Body Composition in Adults and Older People.

Authors:  Andreia Teixeira; Ronaldo Gabriel; José Martinho; Graça Pinto; Luís Quaresma; Aurélio Faria; Irene Oliveira; Helena Moreira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics.

Authors:  Bálint Maczák; Gergely Vadai; András Dér; István Szendi; Zoltán Gingl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detection of real-life activities by a tri-axial accelerometer worn at different body locations: Analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Massimo Porta; Mario Chiesa; Paolo Fornengo; Marta Franceschini; Lucia Tricarico; Aurora Mazzeo; Anna Di Leva; Stefania Bertello; Alessandra Clerico; Salvatore Oleandri; Marina Trento
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.