Literature DB >> 31865743

Opioid utility function: methods and implications.

Cornelis Jan van Dam1, Marijke Hyke Algera1, Erik Olofsen1, Leon Aarts1, Terry Smith1, Monique van Velzen1, Elise Sarton1, Marieke Niesters1, Albert Dahan2.   

Abstract

Opioids are complex drugs that produce profit (most importantly analgesia) as well as a myriad of adverse effects including gastrointestinal motility disturbances, abuse and addiction, sedation and potentially lethal respiratory depression (RD). Consequently, opioid treatment requires careful evaluation in terms of benefit on the one hand and harm on the other. Considering benefit and harm from an economic perspective, opioid treatment should lead to profit maximization with decision theory defining utility as (profit - loss). We here focus on the most devastating opioid adverse effect, RD and define opioid utility U = P(benefit) - P(harm), where P(benefit) is the probability of opioid-induced analgesia and P(harm) the probability of opioid-induced RD. Other utility functions are also discussed including the utility U = P(benefit AND NOT harm), the most wanted opioid effect, i.e., analgesia without RD, and utility surfaces, which depict the continuum of probabilities of presence or absence of analgesia in combination with the presence or absence of RD. Utility functions are constructed from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data sets, although pragmatic utility functions may be constructed when pharmacokinetic data are not available. We here discuss utilities of several opioids including the partial mu-opioid-receptor agonist buprenorphine, the full opioid receptor agonists fentanyl and alfentanil, and the bifunctional opioid cebranopadol, which acts at mu-opioid and nociception/orphanin FQ-receptors. We argue that utility functions give clinicians the opportunity to make an informed decision when opioid analgesics are needed for pain relief, in which opioids with a positive utility function are preferred over opioids with negative functions. Furthermore, utility functions of subpopulations will give an extra insight as a utility functions measured in one subgroup (e.g., patients with postoperative pain, good opioid responders) may not be mirrored in other patient subgroups (e.g., neuropathic pain patients, poor opioid responders).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain; analgesia; benefit; harm; opioid; respiratory depression (RD); utility; utility function

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865743     DOI: 10.21037/apm.2019.10.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Palliat Med        ISSN: 2224-5820


  3 in total

1.  Tapentadol treatment results in long-term pain relief in patients with chronic low back pain and associates with reduced segmental sensitization.

Authors:  Tine van de Donk; Jurjan van Cosburgh; Tom van Dasselaar; Monique van Velzen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Albert Dahan; Marieke Niesters
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-17

2.  Neuropathic Pain: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Monique van Velzen; Albert Dahan; Marieke Niesters
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-07

3.  Evaluation of an Intrathecal Drug Delivery Protocol Leads to Rapid Reduction of Systemic Opioids in the Oncological Population.

Authors:  Matthew A Spiegel; Grant H Chen; Antonio C Solla; Lee P Hingula; Aron Legler; Amitabh Gulati
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.947

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.