Literature DB >> 31865428

Do the opinions of pediatricians influence their recommendations on complementary feeding? Preliminary results.

Paolo Brambilla1, Marco Giussani1, Marina Picca1, Gaetano Bottaro1, Roberto Buzzetti2, Gregorio P Milani3,4, Carlo Agostoni5,6, Paolo Becherucci1.   

Abstract

Complementary feeding practices are debated among pediatricians, primarily regarding whether nutritional needs or developmental readiness should be prioritized in recommendations for starting complementary feeding. The aim of the present study was to analyze the timing of the start of complementary feeding and the related motivations with an 8-item online survey administered to active members of the Italian Society of Primary Care Pediatricians. The participation rate was 43.3% (350 of 808), and 213 (60.9%) and 137 (39.1%) of the participants chose items related to developmental readiness and nutritional needs, respectively, as the criteria for starting complementary feeding. Approximately 74% of the participants reported that they recommended starting complementary feeding between 5 and 6 months of age, 17% recommended starting before 5 months, and 8% recommended starting after 6 months. Predefined schemes were proposed by 38% of the participants, and a responsive feeding modality was proposed by 13%, while the majority (49%) recommended both modalities depending on family characteristics. Regarding recommendations based on nutritional needs, 89% of pediatricians reported providing indications concerning the quantity of meat consumed during the first year of life, and 91% reported recommending introducing added salt only after 12 months of age. Compared with pediatricians who emphasized developmental readiness, those who prioritized nutritional needs suggested earlier complementary feeding start and a higher use of predefined schemes and were more likely to make recommendations regarding meat quantity and added salt (p < 0.0001).Conclusions: Pediatricians who used a developmental readiness criterion for starting complementary feeding may less frequently provide nutritional advice to parents, even if a trend to harmonize the different positions regarding complementary feeding start time is emerging.What is Known:• Pediatricians make suggestions for introducing complementary feeding based on scientific evidence, local traditions, and personal beliefs.• Either infants' nutritional needs or their developmental readiness currently is used as determinant for the timing of complementary feeding.What is New:• More than 60% of Italian pediatricians consider developmental readiness a priority for introducing complementary feeding.• Pediatricians following the criterion of developmental readiness may less frequently give detailed nutritional advice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental readiness; Nutritional advice; Prevention; Responsive feeding; Salt consumption

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865428     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03548-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  25 in total

1.  The Start Healthy Feeding Guidelines for Infants and Toddlers.

Authors:  Nancy Butte; Kathleen Cobb; Johanna Dwyer; Laura Graney; William Heird; Karyl Rickard
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-03

2.  Relationship between portion size and energy intake among infants and toddlers: evidence of self-regulation.

Authors:  Mary Kay Fox; Barbara Devaney; Kathleen Reidy; Carol Razafindrakoto; Paula Ziegler
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-01

3.  A comparison between the feeding practices of parents and grandparents.

Authors:  Azize Pınar Metbulut; Elif N Özmert; Ozlem Teksam; Kadriye Yurdakök
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Monitoring breastfeeding rates in Italy: national surveys 1995 and 1999.

Authors:  M Giovannini; G Banderali; G Radaelli; V Carmine; E Riva; C Agostoni
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  Feeding practices of infants through the first year of life in Italy.

Authors:  M Giovannini; E Riva; G Banderali; S Scaglioni; S H E Veehof; M Sala; G Radaelli; C Agostoni
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 6.  Recommendations on complementary feeding for healthy, full-term infants.

Authors:  Patrizia Alvisi; Sandra Brusa; Stefano Alboresi; Sergio Amarri; Paolo Bottau; Giovanni Cavagni; Barbara Corradini; Linda Landi; Leonardo Loroni; Miris Marani; Irene M Osti; Carlotta Povesi-Dascola; Carlo Caffarelli; Luca Valeriani; Carlo Agostoni
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.638

7.  How different are baby-led weaning and conventional complementary feeding? A cross-sectional study of infants aged 6-8 months.

Authors:  Brittany J Morison; Rachael W Taylor; Jillian J Haszard; Claire J Schramm; Liz Williams Erickson; Louise J Fangupo; Elizabeth A Fleming; Ashley Luciano; Anne-Louise M Heath
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  The timing of solid introduction in an 'obesogenic' environment: a narrative review of the evidence and methodological issues.

Authors:  Lynne Daniels; Kimberley M Mallan; Alison Fildes; Jacinda Wilson
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.939

Review 9.  How feasible is Baby-led Weaning as an approach to infant feeding? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Sonya L Cameron; Anne-Louise M Heath; Rachael W Taylor
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families.

Authors:  Sonya L Cameron; Rachael W Taylor; Anne-Louise M Heath
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.