Vincent Galand1,2, Brian Ghoshhajra3, Jackie Szymonifka4, Saumya Das2, Mary Orencole2, Valentin Barré1, Raphaël P Martins1, Christophe Leclercq1, Judy Hung2, Quynh A Truong5, Jagmeet P Singh2. 1. Cardiology Department, University of Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, LTSI - UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France. 2. Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 3. Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Radiology (Cardiovascular Imaging), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, New York University, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Up to 30% of selected heart failure patients do not benefit clinically from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) analysed using computed tomography (CT) has rarely been evaluated in response to CRT and mitral regurgitation (MR) improvement. We examined the association of LVWT and the ability to reverse LV remodelling and MR improvement after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four patients scheduled for CRT underwent pre-procedural CT. Reduced LVWT was defined as WT <6 mm and quantified as a percentage of total LV area. Endpoints were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)], MR improvement and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of LVWT <6 mm area: ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50%. At 6 months, 75%, 71%, and 42% of the patients experienced NYHA improvement in the ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50% group, respectively. Additionally, ≤20% group presented higher LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (86%, 59%, and 83%, respectively). Both 20-50% and ≥50% groups exhibited a lower LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (52% and 42%; 47% and 45%; and 53% and 45%, respectively). Additionally, ≥25% of LVWT <6 mm inclusive of at least one papillary muscle insertion was the only predictor of lack of MR improvement. Lastly, ≥50% group experienced significantly lower 2-year MACE survival free probability. CONCLUSION: WT evaluated using CT could help to stratify the response to CRT and predict MR improvement and outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01097733. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Up to 30% of selected heart failurepatients do not benefit clinically from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) analysed using computed tomography (CT) has rarely been evaluated in response to CRT and mitral regurgitation (MR) improvement. We examined the association of LVWT and the ability to reverse LV remodelling and MR improvement after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-four patients scheduled for CRT underwent pre-procedural CT. Reduced LVWT was defined as WT <6 mm and quantified as a percentage of total LV area. Endpoints were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV)], MR improvement and 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Patients were divided into three groups according to the percentage of LVWT <6 mm area: ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50%. At 6 months, 75%, 71%, and 42% of the patients experienced NYHA improvement in the ≤20%, 20-50%, and ≥50% group, respectively. Additionally, ≤20% group presented higher LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (86%, 59%, and 83%, respectively). Both 20-50% and ≥50% groups exhibited a lower LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV positive response rate (52% and 42%; 47% and 45%; and 53% and 45%, respectively). Additionally, ≥25% of LVWT <6 mm inclusive of at least one papillary muscle insertion was the only predictor of lack of MR improvement. Lastly, ≥50% group experienced significantly lower 2-year MACE survival free probability. CONCLUSION: WT evaluated using CT could help to stratify the response to CRT and predict MR improvement and outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01097733. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jean-Claude Daubert; Leslie Saxon; Philip B Adamson; Angelo Auricchio; Ronald D Berger; John F Beshai; Ole Breithard; Michele Brignole; John Cleland; David B DeLurgio; Kenneth Dickstein; Derek V Exner; Michael Gold; Richard A Grimm; David L Hayes; Carsten Israel; Christophe Leclercq; Cecilia Linde; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Bela Merkely; Lluis Mont; Francis Murgatroyd; Frits Prinzen; Samir F Saba; Jerold S Shinbane; Jagmeet Singh; Anthony S Tang; Panos E Vardas; Bruce L Wilkoff; Jose Luis Zamorano; Inder Anand; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; John P Boehmer; Hugh Calkins; Serge Cazeau; Victoria Delgado; N A Mark Estes; David Haines; Fred Kusumoto; Paco Leyva; Frank Ruschitzka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Christian Tobias Torp-Pedersen Journal: Europace Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Francisco Leyva; Robin J Taylor; Paul W X Foley; Fraz Umar; Lawrence J Mulligan; Kiran Patel; Berthold Stegemann; Tarek Haddad; Russell E A Smith; Sanjay K Prasad Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S Liddy; U Buckley; H K Kok; B Loo; B Glover; G R Dhillon; O Buckley Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Quynh A Truong; Jackie Szymonifka; Michael H Picard; Wai-Ee Thai; Bryan Wai; Jim W Cheung; E Kevin Heist; Udo Hoffmann; Jagmeet P Singh Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Yitschak Biton; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa; Jayson R Baman; Scott Solomon; Arthur J Moss; Barbara Szepietowska; Scott McNitt; Bronislava Polonsky; Wojciech Zareba; Alon Barsheshet Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gabe B Bleeker; Theodorus A M Kaandorp; Hildo J Lamb; Eric Boersma; Paul Steendijk; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-02-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Claude Daubert; Michael R Gold; William T Abraham; Stefano Ghio; Christian Hassager; Grahame Goode; Tamás Szili-Török; Cecilia Linde Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 24.094