| Literature DB >> 31865280 |
David Marlevi1, Hojin Ha2, Desmond Dillon-Murphy3, Joao F Fernandes4, Daniel Fovargue5, Massimiliano Colarieti-Tosti6, Matilda Larsson7, Pablo Lamata8, C Alberto Figueroa9, Tino Ebbers10, David A Nordsletten11.
Abstract
Vascular pressure differences are established risk markers for a number of cardiovascular diseases. Relative pressures are, however, often driven by turbulence-induced flow fluctuations, where conventional non-invasive methods may yield inaccurate results. Recently, we proposed a novel method for non-turbulent flows, νWERP, utilizing the concept of virtual work-energy to accurately probe relative pressure through complex branching vasculature. Here, we present an extension of this approach for turbulent flows: νWERP-t. We present a theoretical method derivation based on flow covariance, quantifying the impact of flow fluctuations on relative pressure. νWERP-t is tested on a set of in-vitro stenotic flow phantoms with data acquired by 4D flow MRI with six-directional flow encoding, as well as on a patient-specific in-silico model of an acute aortic dissection. Over all tests νWERP-t shows improved accuracy over alternative energy-based approaches, with excellent recovery of estimated relative pressures. In particular, the use of a guaranteed divergence-free virtual field improves accuracy in cases where turbulent flows skew the apparent divergence of the acquired field. With the original νWERP allowing for assessment of relative pressure into previously inaccessible vasculatures, the extended νWERP-t further enlarges the method's clinical scope, underlining its potential as a novel tool for assessing relative pressure in-vivo.Entities:
Keywords: 4D flow MRI; Fluid mechanics; Relative pressure; Turbulence; Turbulent energy dissipation; Virtual work-energy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31865280 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101627
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Image Anal ISSN: 1361-8415 Impact factor: 8.545