Literature DB >> 31865029

Optimising Aortic Endovascular Repair in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.

Quentin Pellenc1, Antoine Girault2, Arnaud Roussel2, Romain De Blic3, Pierre Cerceau3, Richard Raffoul4, Oliver Milleron5, Guillaume Jondeau6, Yves Castier2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients, endovascular repair carries a risk of aortic wall injury, which may result in retrograde aortic dissection, dilatation, or false aneurysm at the landing zones. It was hypothesised that potentially these complications may be avoided using modified practices. This study aimed to describe experience of a specific protocol for endovascular aortic repair in patients with MFS.
METHODS: All MFS patients treated by aortic endovascular repair between February 2015 and August 2018 were included prospectively. The following rules were applied: (i) excluding stent grafts with bare stents and barbs, (ii) proximal landing in a pre-existing graft, or (iii) minimising proximal oversizing when landing in the proximal native aorta (<10%), and (iv) distal undersizing for chronic dissection cases.
RESULTS: In eighteen patients (55% men, mean age: 47 ± 17 years), the index procedures were initial endovascular aortic repair (n = 10), elephant trunk completion (n = 6), and anastomotic pseudo-aneurysm after thoracic open repair (n = 2). The technical success rate was 100%. Proximal landing was in the native aorta in 11 patients (61%), with a mean proximal oversizing of 2.4 mm (8% oversized). Distal landing in the native aorta was performed in 16 cases (89%), with a mean distal undersizing of 8.9 mm (- 23%). No mortality, spinal cord ischaemia, stroke, or retrograde aortic dissection occurred post-operatively. One type 1b endoleak was observed. The mean follow up was 21.4 months. Aortic aneurysm related mortality was 5% (n = 1) and occurred after distal thoraco-abdominal surgery planned from the outset (prior to endovascular repair). Another patient presented a proximal landing zone complication with aortic enlargement. The mean maximum aortic diameter decreased significantly from 59 mm to 45 mm (p = .0005) after treatment.
CONCLUSION: The specific protocol described in this study seems to optimise the results of endovascular aortic repair in MFS patients with significant aortic remodelling.
Copyright © 2019 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic dissection; Endovascular aortic repair; Marfan syndrome; Thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865029     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.09.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  4 in total

Review 1.  Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Dianna M Milewicz; Alan C Braverman; Julie De Backer; Shaine A Morris; Catherine Boileau; Irene H Maumenee; Guillaume Jondeau; Arturo Evangelista; Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 65.038

2.  Long-term outcomes after aortic root replacement for patients with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Yu Zhu; Zhao Jian; Ruiyan Ma; Yong Wang; Yingbin Xiao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Non-Dissecting Distal Aortic and Peripheral Arterial Aneurysms in Patients With Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Quentin Pellenc; Auréline Boitet; Arnaud Roussel; Olivier Milleron; Pierre Mordant; Jean Senemaud; Pierre Cerceau; Guillaume Jondeau; Yves Castier
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-11

4.  One-Year Single-Center Results of the Multilayer Flow Modulator Stents for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Victor S Costache; Jorn P Meekel; Andreea Costache; Tatiana Melnic; Cristian Bucurenciu; Anca Chitic; Gabriela Candea; Crina Solomon; Kak K Yeung
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.487

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.