Literature DB >> 31863936

Accuracy of Published Indications for Predicting Use of Damage Control During Laparotomy for Trauma.

Derek J Roberts1, Henry T Stelfox2, Laura J Moore3, Bryan A Cotton3, John B Holcomb3, John A Harvin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although studies have identified published indications that experts and practicing surgeons agree indicate use of damage control (DC) laparotomy, it is unknown whether these indications predict use of the procedure in practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a diagnostic performance study of the accuracy of a set of published appropriateness indications for predicting use of DC laparotomy. We included consecutive adults that underwent emergent laparotomy for trauma (2011-2016) at Memorial Hermann Hospital.
RESULTS: We included 1141 injured adults. Two published preoperative appropriateness indications [a systolic blood pressure (BP) persistently <90 mmHg or core body temperature <34°C] produced moderate shifts in the pretest probability of conducting DC instead of definitive laparotomy. Five published intraoperative appropriateness indications produced large and often conclusive changes in the pretest probability of conducting DC during emergent laparotomy. These included the finding of a devascularized or completely disrupted pancreas, duodenum, or pancreaticoduodenal complex; an estimated intraoperative blood loss >4 L; administration of >10 U of packed red blood cells (PRBCs); and a systolic BP persistently <90 mmHg or arterial pH persistently <7.2 during operation. Most indications that produced large changes in the pretest probability of conducting DC laparotomy had an incidence of 2% or less.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that published appropriateness indications accurately predict use of DC laparotomy in practice. Intraoperative variables exert greater influence on the decision to conduct DC laparotomy than preoperative variables, and those indications that produce large shifts in the pretest probability of conducting DC laparotomy are uncommonly encountered.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Damage control; Indications; Laparotomy; Wounds and injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31863936     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

Review 1.  Damage control surgical management of combined small and large bowel injuries in penetrating trauma: Are ostomies still pertinent?

Authors:  Carlos A Ordoñez; Michael W Parra; Yaset Caicedo; Natalia Padilla; Edison Angamarca; José Julián Serna; Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín; Alberto García; Alexander Salcedo; Luis Fernando Pino; Adolfo González-Hadad; Mario Alain Herrera; Laureano Quintero; Fabian Hernández; María Josefa Franco; Gonzalo Aristizábal; Luis Eduardo Toro; Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez; Federico Coccolini; Ricardo Ferrada; Rao Ivatury
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2021-04-27

2.  Evidence for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Derek J Roberts; Niklas Bobrovitz; David A Zygun; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Chad G Ball; Peter D Faris; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Major surgery leads to a proinflammatory phenotype: Differential gene expression following a laparotomy.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Dobson; Jodie L Morris; Erik Biros; Lisa M Davenport; Hayley L Letson
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-21

4.  Variation in use of damage control laparotomy for trauma by trauma centers in the United States, Canada, and Australasia.

Authors:  Derek J Roberts; Peter D Faris; Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Ernest E Moore; David V Feliciano; Peter Rhee; Scott D'Amours; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.469

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.