Rénuka S Birbal1, Lamis Baydoun2, Lisanne Ham1, Alina Miron3, Korine van Dijk3, Isabel Dapena3, Martine J Jager4, Stefan Böhringer5, Silke Oellerich6, Gerrit R J Melles7. 1. Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery (NIIOS), Rotterdam, Netherlands; Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Amnitrans Eye Bank Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. 2. Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery (NIIOS), Rotterdam, Netherlands; Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany. 3. Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery (NIIOS), Rotterdam, Netherlands; Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. 5. Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. 6. Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery (NIIOS), Rotterdam, Netherlands. 7. Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery (NIIOS), Rotterdam, Netherlands; Melles Cornea Clinic Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Amnitrans Eye Bank Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; NIIOS-USA, San Diego, California, USA. Electronic address: research@niios.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze 6-month results of 1000 consecutive Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) cases, and to evaluate if outcomes are influenced by surgical indication and preoperative lens status. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: A series of 1000 eyes (738 patients) underwent DMEK mainly for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD; 85.3%) or bullous keratopathy (BK; 10.5%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, postoperative complications, and retransplantations. RESULTS: At 6 months after DMEK, there was no difference in BCVA outcome between FECD and BK eyes (P = .170), or between phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (P = .066) after correcting for patient age and preoperative BCVA. Endothelial cell loss at 6 months postoperatively was similar for phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (39%; P = .852), but higher for BK eyes than for FECD eyes (46% vs 39%, P = .001). Primary and secondary graft failure occurred in 3 (0.3%) and 2 eyes (0.2%), respectively, and 7 eyes developed allograft rejection (0.7%). Eighty-two eyes (8.2%) received rebubbling for graft detachment and retransplantation was performed in 20 eyes (2.0%). Rebubbling was more often required in eyes treated for BK vs FECD eyes (12.4% vs 7.4%, P = .022). CONCLUSION: DMEK consistently provides excellent short-term results, with similar high visual acuity levels for both FECD and BK eyes. As preoperative lens status did not influence DMEK outcomes, for phakic FECD eyes with a still relatively clear crystalline lens, lens preservation may be preferable in a selected group of younger patients, who may still benefit from their residual accommodative capacity.
PURPOSE: To analyze 6-month results of 1000 consecutive Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) cases, and to evaluate if outcomes are influenced by surgical indication and preoperative lens status. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: A series of 1000 eyes (738 patients) underwent DMEK mainly for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD; 85.3%) or bullous keratopathy (BK; 10.5%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, postoperative complications, and retransplantations. RESULTS: At 6 months after DMEK, there was no difference in BCVA outcome between FECD and BK eyes (P = .170), or between phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (P = .066) after correcting for patient age and preoperative BCVA. Endothelial cell loss at 6 months postoperatively was similar for phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (39%; P = .852), but higher for BK eyes than for FECD eyes (46% vs 39%, P = .001). Primary and secondary graft failure occurred in 3 (0.3%) and 2 eyes (0.2%), respectively, and 7 eyes developed allograft rejection (0.7%). Eighty-two eyes (8.2%) received rebubbling for graft detachment and retransplantation was performed in 20 eyes (2.0%). Rebubbling was more often required in eyes treated for BK vs FECD eyes (12.4% vs 7.4%, P = .022). CONCLUSION: DMEK consistently provides excellent short-term results, with similar high visual acuity levels for both FECD and BK eyes. As preoperative lens status did not influence DMEK outcomes, for phakic FECD eyes with a still relatively clear crystalline lens, lens preservation may be preferable in a selected group of younger patients, who may still benefit from their residual accommodative capacity.
Authors: Axelle Semler-Collery; Florian Bloch; George Hayek; Christophe Goetz; Jean Marc Perone Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 3.240