Literature DB >> 31863617

Salvage radical prostatectomy following focal therapy: functional and oncological outcomes.

Jaime O Herrera-Caceres1, Gregory J Nason1, Noelia Salgado-Sanmamed2, Hanan Goldberg1, Dixon T S Woon1, Thenappen Chandrasekar1, Khaled Ajib1, Guan Hee Tan1, Omar Alhunaidi1, Theodorus van der Kwast3, Antonio Finelli1, Alexandre R Zlotta1, Robert J Hamilton1, Alejandro Berlin2, Nathan Perlis1, Neil E Fleshner1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) after focal therapy (FT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent sRP after FT was performed. Clinical and pathological outcomes focussed on surgical complications, oncological, and functional outcomes.
RESULTS: In all, 34 patients were identified. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 61 (8.25) years. FT modalities included high-intensity focussed ultrasound (19 patients), laser ablation (13), focal brachytherapy (one) and cryotherapy (one). The median (IQR) time from FT to recurrence was 10.9 (17.6) months. There were no rectal or ureteric injuries. Two (5.9%) patients had iatrogenic cystotomies and four (11.8%) developed bladder neck contractures. The mean (sd) hospital stay was 2.5 (2.1) days. The T-stage was pT2 in 14 (41.2%) patients, pT3a in 16 (47.1%), and pT3b in four (11.8%). In all, 13 (38%) patients had positive surgical margins (PSMs). Six (17.6%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). At a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, seven (20.6%) patients developed biochemical recurrence (BCR), and of these, six (17.6%) patients required salvage RT. PSMs were associated with worse BCR-free survival (hazard ratio 6.624, 95% confidence interval 2.243-19.563; P < 0.001). The median (IQR) preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function score was 7 (4.5-9.5) and 23.5 (15.75-25) respectively, while in the final follow-up the median (IQR) values were 7 (3.5-11) and 6 (5-12.25), respectively (P = 0.088 and P < 0.001). At last follow-up, 31 (91.2%) patients were continent, two (5.9%) had moderate (>1 pad/day) incontinence, and one (2.9%) required an artificial urinary sphincter.
CONCLUSIONS: sRP should be considered as an option for patients who have persistent clinically significant prostate cancer or recurrence after FT. PSMs should be recognised as a risk for recurrent disease after sRP.
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; focal therapy; high-intensity focussed ultrasound; prostate cancer; recurrence; salvage prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31863617     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

1.  Making a case "for" focal therapy of the prostate in intermediate risk prostate cancer: current perspective and ongoing trials.

Authors:  Alex Z Wang; Amir H Lebastchi; Luke P O'Connor; Michael Ahdoot; Sherif Mehralivand; Nitin Yerram; Samir S Taneja; Arvin K George; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; John F Ward; Pilar Laguna; Jean de la Rosette; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Male sexual dysfunction and rehabilitation strategies in the settings of salvage prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Salvage Versus Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity-matched Comparative Effectiveness Study from a High-volume Tertiary Centre.

Authors:  Arjun Nathan; Monty Fricker; Ruben De Groote; Amandeep Arora; Yuzhi Phuah; Kiran Flora; Sonam Patel; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Ashwin Sridhar; Greg Shaw; John Kelly; Tim Briggs; Prabhakar Rajan; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Senthil Nathan
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-05

4.  Salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy following focal ablation with irreversible electroporation: feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandar Blazevski; William Gondoputro; Matthijs J Scheltema; Amer Amin; Bart Geboers; Daniela Barreto; Anne-Maree Haynes; Ron Shnier; Warick Delprado; Shikha Agrawal; James E Thompson; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Triggers and oncologic outcome of salvage radical prostatectomy, salvage radiotherapy and active surveillance after focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jost von Hardenberg; Hannes Cash; Daniel Koch; Angelika Borkowetz; Johannes Bruendl; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Timur H Kuru; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Daniel Schindele; Katharina S Mala; Niklas Westhoff; Andreas Blana; Martin Schostak
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Applications of Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  John Panzone; Timothy Byler; Gennady Bratslavsky; Hanan Goldberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.