Andrea Morotti1, Giorgio Busto2, Andrea Bernardoni3, Eleonora Leuci4, Ilaria Casetta5, Enrico Fainardi6. 1. Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy. andrea.morotti85@gmail.com. 2. Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. 3. Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Arcispedale S. Anna, Ferrara, Italy. 4. Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Via Mondino 2, 27100, Pavia, Italy. 5. Section of Neurology Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. 6. Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Hypoperfusion in the perihematomal rim is common in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) but its determinants remain incompletely characterized. Despite known biological differences between deep and lobar ICH, the association between ICH location and cerebral perfusion has not been investigated. We tested the hypothesis that perihematomal perfusion differs between deep and lobar ICH. METHODS: Prospectively collected cohort of subjects with primary spontaneous ICH undergoing CT perfusion on admission. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) were measured in the manually outlined perihematomal low-density area. The association between perihematomal perfusion and ICH location was explored with multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were enrolled (59 with a lobar bleeding). In univariate analysis, median perihematomal CBF and CBV were lower in lobar ICH compared with deep ICH (23.8 vs 33.4 mL/100 g/min, p = 0.001 and 1.7 vs 2.3 mL/100 g, p = 0.001, respectively). Lobar ICH location remained inversely associated with CBF (β = - 0.17, p = 0.038) and CBV (β = - 0.19, p = 0.023) after adjustment for confounders in linear regression. CONCLUSION: Lobar ICH location is inversely related with perihematomal CBF and CBV. Further studies are needed to confirm this association and define the underlying biological mechanisms.
PURPOSE: Hypoperfusion in the perihematomal rim is common in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) but its determinants remain incompletely characterized. Despite known biological differences between deep and lobar ICH, the association between ICH location and cerebral perfusion has not been investigated. We tested the hypothesis that perihematomal perfusion differs between deep and lobar ICH. METHODS: Prospectively collected cohort of subjects with primary spontaneous ICH undergoing CT perfusion on admission. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) were measured in the manually outlined perihematomal low-density area. The association between perihematomal perfusion and ICH location was explored with multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were enrolled (59 with a lobar bleeding). In univariate analysis, median perihematomal CBF and CBV were lower in lobar ICH compared with deep ICH (23.8 vs 33.4 mL/100 g/min, p = 0.001 and 1.7 vs 2.3 mL/100 g, p = 0.001, respectively). Lobar ICH location remained inversely associated with CBF (β = - 0.17, p = 0.038) and CBV (β = - 0.19, p = 0.023) after adjustment for confounders in linear regression. CONCLUSION: Lobar ICH location is inversely related with perihematomal CBF and CBV. Further studies are needed to confirm this association and define the underlying biological mechanisms.
Authors: Lewis B Morgenstern; J Claude Hemphill; Craig Anderson; Kyra Becker; Joseph P Broderick; E Sander Connolly; Steven M Greenberg; James N Huang; R Loch MacDonald; Steven R Messé; Pamela H Mitchell; Magdy Selim; Rafael J Tamargo Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-07-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Nicholas M Gregg; Albert E Kim; M Edip Gurol; Oscar L Lopez; Howard J Aizenstein; Julie C Price; Chester A Mathis; Jeffrey A James; Beth E Snitz; Ann D Cohen; M Ilyas Kamboh; Davneet Minhas; Lisa A Weissfeld; Erica L Tamburo; William E Klunk Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Maurizio Acampa; Francesca Guideri; Ilaria Di Donato; Rossana Tassi; Giovanna Marotta; Giuseppe Lo Giudice; Paolo D'Andrea; Giuseppe Martini Journal: J Stroke Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 6.967
Authors: Matthew B Maas; Alexander J Nemeth; Neil F Rosenberg; Adam R Kosteva; James C Guth; Eric M Liotta; Shyam Prabhakaran; Andrew M Naidech Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Guido J Falcone; Alessandro Biffi; H Bart Brouwers; Christopher D Anderson; Thomas W K Battey; Alison M Ayres; Anastasia Vashkevich; Kristin Schwab; Natalia S Rost; Joshua N Goldstein; Anand Viswanathan; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Natalia S Rost; Eric E Smith; Yuchiao Chang; Ryan W Snider; Rishi Chanderraj; Kristin Schwab; Emily FitzMaurice; Lauren Wendell; Joshua N Goldstein; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mark A Rodrigues; Neshika Samarasekera; Christine Lerpiniere; Catherine Humphreys; Mark O McCarron; Philip M White; James A R Nicoll; Cathie L M Sudlow; Charlotte Cordonnier; Joanna M Wardlaw; Colin Smith; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Muhammad E Haque; Seth B Boren; Octavio D Arevalo; Reshmi Gupta; Sarah George; Maria A Parekh; Xiurong Zhao; Jaraslow Aronowski; Sean I Savitz Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-11-30 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Peter B Sporns; Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Grégoire Boulouis; Andreas Charidimou; Qi Li; Enrico Fainardi; Dar Dowlatshahi; Joshua N Goldstein; Andrea Morotti Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 4.241