| Literature DB >> 31863037 |
Jonathan Vigne1,2,3, Sylvie Bay4,5, Rachida Aid-Launais6,7, Guillaume Pariscoat8,6,7, Guillaume Rucher6,7, Jean Sénémaud7, Ariane Truffier4, Nadège Anizan6,7, Guillaume Even6, Christelle Ganneau4,5, Francesco Andreata6, Marie Le Borgne6, Antonino Nicoletti6, Dominique Le Guludec8,6,7, Giuseppina Caligiuri6, Francois Rouzet8,6,7.
Abstract
There is a need for new targets to specifically localize inflammatory foci, usable in a wide range of organs. Here, we hypothesized that the cleaved molecular form of CD31 is a suitable target for molecular imaging of inflammation. We evaluated a bioconjugate of D-P8RI, a synthetic peptide that binds all cells with cleaved CD31, in an experimental rat model of sterile acute inflammation. Male Wistar rats were injected with turpentine oil into the gastrocnemius muscle two days before 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI (or its analogue with L-Proline) SPECT/CT or [18F]FDG PET/MRI. Biodistribution, stability study, histology, imaging and autoradiography of 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI were further performed. Biodistribution studies revealed rapid elimination of 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI through renal excretion with almost no uptake from most organs and excellent in vitro and in vivo stability were observed. SPECT/CT imaging showed a significant higher 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI uptake compared with its analogue with L-Proline (negative control) and no significant difference compared with [18F]FDG (positive control). Moreover, autoradiography and histology revealed a co-localization between 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI uptake and inflammatory cell infiltration. 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI constitutes a new tool for the detection and localization of inflammatory sites. Our work suggests that targeting cleaved CD31 is an attractive strategy for the specific in vivo imaging of inflammatory processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31863037 PMCID: PMC6925130 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56163-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) P8RI-based conjugates: HYNIC-D-P8RI (R = R1) and putative structure of its corresponding EDDA complexes after labeling: [99mTc(HYNIC-D-P8RI)(EDDA)] (R = R2) and [99mTc(HYNIC-D-P8RI)(EDDA2)] (R = R3). (b–e) Optimization of the radiolabeling process. b RP-HPLC chromatograms of: HYNIC-D-P8RI (UV detection); (c–e) 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI (radio detection) using tricine as coligand, EDDA as coligand and tricine/EDDA exchange strategy, respectively. The chemical or radiochemical purity (CP or RCP), as well as the retention time (tR) are indicated on each panel.
Selected HPLC/MS data for HYNIC-D-P8RI and its corresponding Tc conjugates. Calculated m/z values are based on the exact molecular mass using MassLynx calculator (Waters, France). M refers to the unlabeled and uncharged peptide conjugate HYNIC-P8RI.
| Compound | Assignment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HYNIC-D-P8RI | 1354.764 | 1354.718 | [M + H]+ |
| [99Tc(HYNIC-D-P8RI)(EDDA)] | 1624.750 | 1625.116 | [(M + 99Tc + EDDA - 5 H) + H]+ |
| [99Tc(HYNIC-D-P8RI)(EDDA2)] | 1800.830 | 1801.226 | [(M + 99Tc + 2 EDDA - 5 H) + H]+ |
Figure 2In vitro assessment of 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI in human plasma (a,b). (a) Percentage of human plasma protein binding over 4 h (mean ± SD) evaluated by size exclusion chromatography. Control (grey bar) refers to the same experiment performed in PBS instead of human plasma. (b) Percentage of intact 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI in human plasma over 4 h, referred as RCP and assessed by RP-HPLC. (c) Biodistribution (%ID/g, n = 3) of 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI in male Wistar rats at 15, 30, 90 min and 24 h post-injection. Columns, mean; bars, SD. (d) RP-HPLC chromatogram (radio detection) of rat urine 90 min p.i; radiochemical purity (RCP) and retention time (tR) are indicated.
Figure 3Axial, sagittal and coronal views of rats left (saline) and right (Turpentine oil) hind limbs (pink and green regions of interest, respectively) obtained with 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI (a), 99mTc-HYNIC-L-P8RI (b) SPECT/CT, and [18F]FDG PET/MR (c). 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI and [18F]FDG uptake was associated with local inflammation compared with a low signal of 99mTc-HYNIC-L-P8RI. All radiotracers displayed a very low uptake in the contralateral hindlimb (control). Bladder is pointed with a white arrow in (a).
Figure 4Mean signal ratios (Mean signal inflammatory muscle/Mean signal contralateral muscle) calculated on scintigrams from the [18F]FDG, 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI and 99mTc-HYNIC-L-P8RI injected animals. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, NS: Non significant.
Figure 5Masson’s trichrome staining (a,b,e–l) and autoradiography (c,d) of gastrocnemius muscles 2 days after intramuscular injection of saline (control, left hind limb) or turpentine oil (right hind limb). Animals were sacrificed 1 hour after intravenous 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI administration. Masson’s trichrome staining in (a) and (b) corresponds to the same slices of autoradiography in (c) and (d). Turpentine injected muscle (a) displays evidence of inflammation with edema and major leukocyte infiltration (e,g,i,k: x1.25, x2.5, x10, x20 respectively), co-localized with a high uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI. The representative micrographs (b) corresponds to a control muscle matching with a low uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-D-P8RI (d). Higher magnifications of the control show no evidence of inflammation (f,h,j,l).
Figure 6Fluorescence microscopy of the rat right gastrocnemius muscle, 2 days after turpentine oil injection. (a) Rhodamine labeled D-P8RI positive signal (black) is concentrated at the border of the turpentine oil injection. (b) Higher magnification in the blue inset reveals that D-P8RI labeled cells are enriched at the immediate vicinity of the damaged tissue. (c) Immunofluorescence of another rat right gastrocnemius muscle after turpentine oil injection. (d) The inner layer of the cells concentrated around the site of turpentine oil injection is mainly composed of CD68+ leucocytes (Fuchsia). (e) The mononuclear and polynuclear leukocytes (identified by the DAPI staining) at the immediate vicinity of the damaged tissue (red inset) display a cleavage of CD31 as revealed by the relative negative extracellular CD31 (eCD31) signal (green) in spite of a consistent intracellular CD31 (iCD31) staining (red). (f) The cleavage of CD31 was instead rather limited at the surface of the leukocytes located at the periphery of the inflammatory site (green inset). Of note, in parallel with a lesser CD31 cleavage phenomenon, the D-P8RI signal appears weaker in such an outer layer of the inflammatory site, as documented in (b).