| Literature DB >> 31862962 |
Haowen Luo1,2, Bin Du1,2, Longxin He1,2, Jing He3, Lian Hu3, Shenggang Pan1,2, Xiangru Tang4,5.
Abstract
Zinc (Zn) is an important microelement for rice and plays a key role in many physiological processes. This study assessed the physio-biochemical responses involved in biosynthesis of 2-acety-1-pyrroline (2-AP), which is a key compound in the aroma of fragrant rice, in four different fragrant rice varieties, i.e., Meixiangzhan-2, Xiangyaxiangzhan, Ruanhuayou-134, and Yunjingyou. Four concentrations (0, 0.50, 1.00 and 2.00 g L-1) of zinc chloride were applied to fragrant rice foliage at the heading stage and named CK, Zn1, Zn2 and Zn3, respectively. Our results showed that compared with CK, the Zn1, Zn2 and Zn3 treatments all significantly increased the 2-AP concentration in mature grains of the four fragrant rice genotypes. Furthermore, exogenous application of Zn not only enhanced the activities of enzymes, including proline dehydrogenase (PDH), △1-pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid synthetase (P5CS), and diamine oxidase (DAO), which are involved in 2-AP biosynthesis, but also improved the contents of the related precursors, such as Δ1-pyrroline, proline and pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid (P5C). In addition, compared to the CK treatment, the Zn2 treatment markedly increased the net photosynthetic rate of fragrant rice during the grain filling stage and increased the seed-setting rate, 1000-grain weight and grain yield in all fragrant rice genotypes. Foliar application of Zn also markedly increased the grain Zn content. In general, 1.00 g L-1 seemed to be the most suitable application concentration because the highest 2-AP content and grain weight were recorded with this treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31862962 PMCID: PMC6925297 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56159-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Effect of exogenous Zn on 2-AP content mature grains. Means sharing a common letter don’t differ significantly at (P ≤ 0.05) according to least significant difference (LSD) test.
Effect of exogenous Zn application on the activities of enzymes involved in 2-AP biosynthesis in grains
| Variety | Treatment | OAT (μmol g−1 FW) | PDH (U L−1 FW) | P5CS (μmol g−1 FW) | DAO (μmol g−1 FW) | BADH (U L−1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 19.13a | 29.22c | 30.83c | 0.65c | 31.38a | |
| Zn1 | 19.79a | 37.60b | 40.14b | 1.09b | 31.36a | |
| Zn2 | 19.81a | 43.61a | 49.91a | 1.29a | 31.07a | |
| Zn3 | 19.99a | 43.99a | 51.25a | 1.25a | 30.80a | |
| Mean | 19.68 | 38.60 | 43.03 | 1.07 | 31.15 | |
| CK | 22.93a | 53.86c | 30.52c | 1.07c | 31.06a | |
| Zn1 | 22.59a | 61.86b | 42.42b | 1.57b | 30.70a | |
| Zn2 | 23.07a | 71.19a | 62.26a | 1.74a | 30.92a | |
| Zn3 | 22.94a | 70.79a | 61.91a | 1.68a | 30.96a | |
| Mean | 22.88 | 64.43 | 49.28 | 1.52 | 30.91 | |
| CK | 13.73a | 23.53c | 28.20c | 0.66c | 30.58a | |
| Zn1 | 13.90a | 35.70b | 38.35b | 1.14b | 31.51a | |
| Zn2 | 15.02a | 46.09a | 51.39a | 1.28a | 31.09a | |
| Zn3 | 14.01a | 46.13a | 52.38a | 1.32a | 30.88a | |
| Mean | 14.17 | 37.86 | 42.58 | 1.10 | 31.01 | |
| CK | 18.98a | 49.98c | 28.77c | 1.03c | 31.20a | |
| Zn1 | 20.94a | 54.84b | 42.18b | 1.54b | 30.32a | |
| Zn2 | 19.05a | 65.12a | 59.48a | 1.73a | 30.85a | |
| Zn3 | 18.97a | 65.92a | 62.01a | 1.69a | 30.28a | |
| Mean | 19.49 | 58.96 | 48.11 | 1.50 | 30.66 | |
Values sharing a common lower case letter within a column for the same variety do not differ significantly at P <0.05 according to the LSD test. Means of the two rice cultivars followed by asterisk(s) (*, **) for the growth, yield and related traits differ significantly at P <0.05 and P <0.01, respectively, according to the LSD test. The same applies below.
Effect of exogenous Zn application on precursors and related compounds involved in 2-AP biosynthesis.
| Variety | Treatment | Methylglyoxal (μmol g−1 FW) | P5C (μmol g−1 FW) | GABA (μg g−1 FW) | Proline (ug g−1 FW) | Δ1-Pyrroline (mmol g−1 h−1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 14.52c | 0.82c | 17.58b | 32.23c | 2.38c | |
| Zn1 | 15.59b | 0.97b | 18.01ab | 42.06b | 2.50b | |
| Zn2 | 16.33a | 1.04a | 18.66ab | 51.64a | 2.87a | |
| Zn3 | 16.49a | 1.05a | 19.03a | 52.21a | 2.84a | |
| Mean | 15.73 | 0.97 | 18.32 | 44.53 | 2.65 | |
| CK | 12.37c | 0.87c | 16.44a | 39.29c | 2.15c | |
| Zn1 | 14.30b | 1.02b | 16.40a | 54.04b | 3.05b | |
| Zn2 | 16.18a | 1.14a | 16.65a | 66.58a | 3.59a | |
| Zn3 | 16.08a | 1.14a | 16.35a | 66.43a | 3.52a | |
| Mean | 14.73 | 1.04 | 16.46 | 56.59 | 3.08 | |
| CK | 14.10c | 0.67c | 19.46b | 31.53c | 2.22c | |
| Zn1 | 15.56b | 0.98b | 19.84ab | 42.32b | 2.56b | |
| Zn2 | 16.52a | 1.03a | 20.35ab | 51.28a | 2.90a | |
| Zn3 | 16.50a | 1.03a | 20.65a | 51.55a | 2.75a | |
| Mean | 15.67 | 0.93 | 20.07 | 44.17 | 2.6 | |
| CK | 12.33c | 0.88c | 15.65a | 36.42c | 2.16c | |
| Zn1 | 14.51b | 1.06b | 15.62a | 50.94b | 2.78b | |
| Zn2 | 16.15a | 1.17a | 15.41a | 60.09a | 3.27a | |
| Zn3 | 16.08a | 1.17a | 15.66a | 59.07a | 3.26a | |
| Mean | 14.77 | 1.07 | 15.58 | 51.63 | 2.87 | |
Figure 2Effect of exogenous Zn on the net photosynthetic rate of fragrant rice at the filling stage. Means sharing a common letter don’t differ significantly at (P ≤ 0.05) according to least significant difference (LSD) test.
Figure 3Effect of exogenous Zn on the Zn content of mature grains. Means sharing a common letter don’t differ significantly at (P ≤ 0.05) according to least significant difference (LSD) test.
Effect of exogenous Zn application on fragrant rice yield and yield-related trials.
| Variety | Treatment | Effective panicle number per m2 | Grain number per panicle | Seed-setting rate (%) | 1000-grain weight (g) | Yield (t ha−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 328.00a | 161.82a | 78.72b | 20.12b | 4.92c | |
| Zn1 | 320.00a | 162.30a | 80.23ab | 20.34ab | 5.25b | |
| Zn2 | 330.66a | 161.51a | 81.89a | 20.60a | 5.40a | |
| Zn3 | 327.66a | 162.09a | 80.28ab | 20.19ab | 5.16bc | |
| Mean | 326.58 | 161.93 | 80.28 | 20.32 | 5.21 | |
| CK | 303.66a | 126.52a | 78.78c | 18.78b | 4.58c | |
| Zn1 | 297.33a | 127.51a | 81.18b | 19.02ab | 4.83b | |
| Zn2 | 301.33a | 127.26a | 82.84a | 19.12a | 5.02a | |
| Zn3 | 305.66a | 127.92a | 78.78c | 18.79b | 4.75b | |
| Mean | 302.00 | 127.30 | 80.40 | 18.93 | 4.90 | |
| CK | 282.33a | 266.36a | 77.85c | 17.45b | 4.75c | |
| Zn1 | 278.33a | 269.16a | 79.48b | 17.55b | 4.92b | |
| Zn2 | 276.66a | 266.89a | 82.48a | 17.86a | 5.13a | |
| Zn3 | 270.33a | 267.60a | 79.32b | 17.40b | 4.83bc | |
| Mean | 276.91 | 267.50 | 79.79 | 17.57 | 4.96 | |
| CK | 287.66a | 111.17a | 82.00c | 24.08b | 4.08c | |
| Zn1 | 287.00a | 113.17a | 84.60b | 24.32ab | 4.21b | |
| Zn2 | 291.00a | 112.60a | 87.31a | 24.56a | 4.47a | |
| Zn3 | 281.67a | 112.69a | 83.62b | 24.14b | 4.19b | |
| Mean | 286.83 | 112.41 | 84.38 | 24.27 | 4.31 | |
Correlation between 2-AP content and enzymes and compounds involved in 2-AP biosynthesis in different fragrant rice genotypes.
| OAT activity | 0.9370 | 0.1804 | 0.6886 | −0.2349 |
| PDH activity | 0.9772* | 0.9787* | 0.9910** | 0.9934** |
| P5CS activity | 0.9492* | 0.9562* | 0.9688* | 0.9999** |
| DAO activity | 0.9972** | 0.9917** | 0.9854* | 0.9328* |
| BADH activity | −0.6758 | −0.3650 | 0.4894 | −0.5663 |
| Methylglyoxal content | 0.9670* | 0.9872** | 0.9973** | 0.9839* |
| P5C content | 0.9875* | 0.9896* | 0.9700* | 0.9786* |
| GABA content | 0.8628 | 0.2125 | 0.9155 | −0.4350 |
| Proline content | 0.9616* | 0.9914** | 0.9906** | 0.9719* |
| Δ1-Pyrroline content | 0.8879* | 0.9995** | 0.9852* | 0.9863* |
*Significant at P <0.05; **Significant at P <0.01. The same applies below.
Correlation between grain yield and yield-related trials in different fragrant rice genotypes.
| Panicle number per m2 | 0.4939 | −0.3831 | −0.0010 | 0.4461 |
| Grain number per panicle | −0.2517 | −0.2836 | 0.0233 | 0.0484 |
| Seed-setting rate | 0.7114** | 0.6140* | 0.8685** | 0.7495** |
| 1000-grain weight | 0.6795* | 0.5675* | 0.6801* | 0.6569* |
Figure 4Possible mechanism of 2-AP formation in fragrant rice.
Figure 5Regulation of 2-AP biosynthesis by Zn application in fragrant rice.
Figure 6Daily maximum and minimum temperatures during the experiment