Literature DB >> 31862723

More Is Not Always Better: Coinfections with Defensive Symbionts Generate Highly Variable Outcomes.

S R Weldon1, J A Russell2, K M Oliver3.   

Abstract

Animal-associated microbes are highly variable, contributing to a diverse set of symbiont-mediated phenotypes. Given that host and symbiont genotypes, and their interactions, can impact symbiont-based phenotypes across environments, there is potential for extensive variation in fitness outcomes. Pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum, host a diverse assemblage of heritable facultative symbionts (HFS) with characterized roles in host defense. Protective phenotypes have been largely studied as single infections, but pea aphids often carry multiple HFS species, and particular combinations may be enriched or depleted compared to expectations based on chance. Here, we examined the consequences of single infection versus coinfection with two common HFS exhibiting variable enrichment, the antiparasitoid Hamiltonella defensa and the antipathogen Regiella insecticola, across three host genotypes and environments. As expected, single infections with either H. defensa or R. insecticola raised defenses against their respective targets. Single infections with protective H. defensa lowered aphid fitness in the absence of enemy challenge, while R. insecticola was comparatively benign. However, as a coinfection, R. insecticola ameliorated H. defensa infection costs. Coinfected aphids continued to receive antiparasitoid protection from H. defensa, but protection was weakened by R. insecticola in two clones. Notably, H. defensa eliminated survival benefits conferred after pathogen exposure by coinfecting R. insecticola Since pathogen sporulation was suppressed by R. insecticola in coinfected aphids, the poor performance likely stemmed from H. defensa-imposed costs rather than weakened defenses. Our results reveal a complex set of coinfection outcomes which may partially explain natural infection patterns and suggest that symbiont-based phenotypes may not be easily predicted based solely on infection status.IMPORTANCE The hyperdiverse arthropods often harbor maternally transmitted bacteria that protect against natural enemies. In many species, low-diversity communities of heritable symbionts are common, providing opportunities for cooperation and conflict among symbionts, which can impact the defensive services rendered. Using the pea aphid, a model for defensive symbiosis, we show that coinfections with two common defensive symbionts, the antipathogen Regiella and the antiparasite Hamiltonella, produce outcomes that are highly variable compared to single infections, which consistently protect against designated enemies. Compared to single infections, coinfections often reduced defensive services during enemy challenge yet improved aphid fitness in the absence of enemies. Thus, infection with multiple symbionts does not necessarily create generalist aphids with "Swiss army knife" defenses against numerous enemies. Instead, particular combinations of symbionts may be favored for a variety of reasons, including their abilities to lessen the costs of other defensive symbionts when enemies are not present.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coinfection; defense; endosymbionts; evolution; insect; parasitoid; pathogen; protective mutualism; symbiont; symbiosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31862723      PMCID: PMC7028961          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02537-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  72 in total

1.  Population genetics of beneficial heritable symbionts.

Authors:  John Jaenike
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Horizontally transmitted symbionts and host colonization of ecological niches.

Authors:  Lee M Henry; Jean Peccoud; Jean-Christophe Simon; Jarrod D Hadfield; Martin J C Maiden; Julia Ferrari; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Infection density of Wolbachia endosymbiont affected by co-infection and host genotype.

Authors:  Natsuko Kondo; Masakazu Shimada; Takema Fukatsu
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Bacteriophage acquisition restores protective mutualism.

Authors:  Nicole L Lynn-Bell; Michael R Strand; Kerry M Oliver
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Hamiltonella defensa, genome evolution of protective bacterial endosymbiont from pathogenic ancestors.

Authors:  Patrick H Degnan; Yeisoo Yu; Nicholas Sisneros; Rod A Wing; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Impact of environmental stress on aphid clonal resistance to parasitoids: Role of Hamiltonella defensa bacterial symbiosis in association with a new facultative symbiont of the pea aphid.

Authors:  Jean-Frédéric Guay; Simon Boudreault; Dominique Michaud; Conrad Cloutier
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Naturally occurring single and double infection with Wolbachia strains in the butterfly Eurema hecabe: transmission efficiencies and population density dynamics of each Wolbachia strain.

Authors:  Satoko Narita; Masashi Nomura; Daisuke Kageyama
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  Wolbachia in a major African crop pest increases susceptibility to viral disease rather than protects.

Authors:  Robert I Graham; David Grzywacz; Wilfred L Mushobozi; Kenneth Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Variations in the identity and complexity of endosymbiont combinations in whitefly hosts.

Authors:  Einat Zchori-Fein; Tamar Lahav; Shiri Freilich
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Symbionts modify interactions between insects and natural enemies in the field.

Authors:  Jan Hrček; Ailsa H C McLean; H Charles J Godfray
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  7 in total

1.  Context Dependency in Bark Beetle-Fungus Mutualisms Revisited: Assessing Potential Shifts in Interaction Outcomes Against Varied Genetic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Backgrounds.

Authors:  Diana L Six; Kier D Klepzig
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Single-cell Microbiomics Unveils Distribution and Patterns of Microbial Symbioses in the Natural Environment.

Authors:  Vittorio Boscaro; Vittoria Manassero; Patrick J Keeling; Claudia Vannini
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Paraburkholderia Symbionts Display Variable Infection Patterns That Are Not Predictive of Amoeba Host Outcomes.

Authors:  Jacob W Miller; Colleen R Bocke; Andrew R Tresslar; Emily M Schniepp; Susanne DiSalvo
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Impact of Facultative Bacteria on the Metabolic Function of an Obligate Insect-Bacterial Symbiosis.

Authors:  Frances Blow; Nana Y D Ankrah; Noah Clark; Imhoi Koo; Erik L Allman; Qing Liu; Mallappa Anitha; Andrew D Patterson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 7.867

5.  Genetic identity and genotype × genotype interactions between symbionts outweigh species level effects in an insect microbiome.

Authors:  Melanie R Smee; Sally A Raines; Julia Ferrari
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 11.217

6.  Symbiont-conferred immunity interacts with effects of parasitoid genotype and intraguild predation to affect aphid immunity in a clone-specific fashion.

Authors:  Samuel Alexander Purkiss; Mouhammad Shadi Khudr; Oscar Enrique Aguinaga; Reinmar Hager
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-19

7.  Impacts of a novel defensive symbiosis on the nematode host microbiome.

Authors:  Dylan Dahan; Gail M Preston; Jordan Sealey; Kayla C King
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.605

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.