Literature DB >> 31862666

Concurrent validity and inter trial reliability of a single inertial measurement unit for spatial-temporal gait parameter analysis in patients with recent total hip or total knee arthroplasty.

Marco Bravi1, Emilio Gallotta2, Michelangelo Morrone3, Mirella Maselli4, Fabio Santacaterina5, Rossana Toglia6, Calogero Foti7, Silvia Sterzi8, Federica Bressi9, Sandra Miccinilli10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the main causes of disability and its frequent hip and knee joint localization requires surgical joint replacement treatment. Patients after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty often show gait abnormalities, whose comprehension is crucial in order to plan an appropriate rehabilitative treatment. Wearable sensor devices can be a valid tool for gait assessment in clinical practice, being relatively inexpensive and easy to use. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the use of crutches influence the ability of a single inertial measurement unit (IMU), placed on the lower trunk, to correctly record the spatial-temporal gait parameters in patients after recent THA or TKA?
METHODS: 20 patients walking with crutches after recent THA or TKA and 10 healthy subjects were recruited. Each participant was recorded simultaneously with an IMU and with an optoelectronic motion capture system during 5 consecutive walking tests.
RESULTS: Intraclass correlation index of spatial-temporal parameters recorded with the IMU showed moderate to excellent reliability results both for healthy subjects (ICC range 0.626-0.897) and for patients (ICC range 0.596-0.951). In terms of concurrent validity, Pearson's r coefficient of healthy subjects, showed strong to very strong levels of correlations for some spatial-temporal parameters (speed, mean cadence, left and right stride length and stride duration) (r range 0.646-0.977) and very week to moderately week levels of correlation for gait cycle phases (swing, stance, single support and double support) (r range 0.390-0.633). Patients' data analysis showed similar results for general spatial-temporal parameters (r range 0.704-0.986) and slightly lower values for gait cycle phases (r range 0.077-0.464). SIGNIFICANCE: We can consider the single IMU as a reliable tool for the detection of some spatial-temporal gait parameters. Crutches seem to interfere with the detection of the gait cycle phases.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait analysis; Inertial measurement unit; Motion capture system; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31862666     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  7 in total

Review 1.  Inertial Measurement Units and Application for Remote Health Care in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Michael J Rose; Kerry E Costello; Samantha Eigenbrot; Kaveh Torabian; Deepak Kumar
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Agreement between the GAITRite® System and the Wearable Sensor BTS G-Walk® for measurement of gait parameters in healthy adults and Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Slávka Vítečková; Hana Horáková; Kamila Poláková; Radim Krupička; Evžen Růžička; Hana Brožová
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Validity of a New 3-D Motion Analysis Tool for the Assessment of Knee, Hip and Spine Joint Angles during the Single Leg Squat.

Authors:  Igor Tak; Willem-Paul Wiertz; Maarten Barendrecht; Rob Langhout
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Applications of Wearable Movement Sensors for Knee Joint Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Robert Prill; Marina Walter; Aleksandra Królikowska; Roland Becker
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Comparative Analysis of Optoelectronic Accuracy in the Laboratory Setting Versus Clinical Operative Environment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Daina M Brooks
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04

6.  Clinical-Functional Evaluation and Test-Retest Reliability of the G-WALK Sensor in Subjects with Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures 6 Months after Surgery.

Authors:  Mario Fernández-Gorgojo; Diana Salas-Gómez; Pascual Sánchez-Juan; David Barbado; Esther Laguna-Bercero; María Isabel Pérez-Núñez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Association of Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Muscle Function with Gait Ability Assessed Using Inertial Measurement Unit Sensors in Older Women.

Authors:  Bohyun Kim; Changhong Youm; Hwayoung Park; Myeounggon Lee; Hyejin Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.614

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.