| Literature DB >> 31861878 |
Osama Abdelkarim1, Achraf Ammar2, Khaled Trabelsi3,4, Hamdi Cthourou3,5, Darko Jekauc6, Khadijeh Irandoust7, Morteza Taheri7, Klaus Bös6, Alexander Woll6, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi8,9, Anita Hoekelmann2.
Abstract
Underweight and overweight are serious health concerns for many children and could be associated with low physical-fitness levels. This study aimed (i) to evaluate the prevalence of underweight and overweight and (ii) to examine its association with the physical fitness levels in primary male and female schoolchildren. Including 13 government primary-schools, a cross-sectional survey was conducted between 2014 and 2017. Anthropometric characteristics together with the physical-fitness level were measured in 931 schoolchildren aged between 6- and 11-years old. The prevalence of under- and overweight children were 8.49% and 24.06%, respectively. These proportions were not significantly different between males and females and were affected by age (p < 0.001), with a higher prevalence of overweight and a lower prevalence of underweight at 9-11 years, compared to 6-8 years old. Concerning the physical fitness levels, statistical analysis showed a better performance among males compared to females, among participants aged 9-11 years, compared to 6-8 years old, and among underweight and normal-weight, compared to overweight children (p < 0.001). There was a higher prevalence of overweight and lower prevalence of underweight at 9-11 years compared to 6-8 years old. Physical fitness levels were better in (i) males, compared to females, (ii) schoolchildren aged 9-11 years, compared to 6-8 years old, and (iii) underweight and normal-weight, compared to overweight children.Entities:
Keywords: BMI categories; age; gender difference; physical fitness; schoolchildren
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31861878 PMCID: PMC6981920 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics and prevalence of underweight, normal-weight, and overweight in both male and female participants.
| Gender | Age | Underweight | Normal-Weight | Overweight | Height | Weight | BMI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (years) |
| % |
| % |
| % | (m) | (Kg) | (Kg/m2) | |
|
| Total = 484 (52%) | 42 | 8.60% | 327 | 67.60% | 115 | 23.80% | 1.37 ± 0.14 | 35.38 ± 11.5 | 18.42 ± 3.93 |
| 6–8 = 184 (38%) | 18 | 9.80% | 129 | 70.10% | 37 | 20.10% | 1.28 ± 0.08 | 28.53 ± 7.61 | 17.17 ± 3.25 | |
| 9–11 = 300 (62%) | 24 | 8% | 198 | 66% | 78 | 26% | 1.43 ± 0.09 | 39.57 ± 11.3 | 19.18 ± 4.11 * | |
|
| Total = 447 (48%) | 37 | 8.30% | 301 | 67.30% | 109 | 24.4% | 1.36 ± 0.12 | 34.77 ± 11.24 | 18.26 ± 3.77 |
| 6–8 = 170 (38%) | 21 | 12.40% | 116 | 68.20% | 33 | 19.40% | 1.26 ± 0.07 | 26.90 ± 7.37 | 16.75 ± 3.22 | |
| 9–11 = 277 (62%) | 16 | 5.80% | 185 | 66.80% | 76 | 27.40% | 1.42 ± 0.09 | 39.53 ± 10.58 | 19.17 ± 3.78 * | |
|
| 6–11 = 931(100%) | 79 | 8.49% | 628 | 67.45% | 224 | 24.06% | 1.36 ± 0.12 | 35.07 ± 11.37 | 18.34 ± 3.86 |
* Significant difference compared to 6–8 years.
Figure 1The physical fitness level of the tested population; A—significant difference between 6–8 years and 9–11 years, G—significant difference between males and females; and * significant difference compared to normal weight (p < 0.05); ** significant difference compared to normal weight (p < 0.01); and *** significant difference compared to normal weight (p < 0.001).