| Literature DB >> 31861748 |
Maria Teresa Di Martino1, Mariamena Arbitrio2, Massimiliano Fonsi3, Claudio Alberto Erratico3, Francesca Scionti1, Daniele Caracciolo1, Pierosandro Tagliaferri1, Pierfrancesco Tassone1,4.
Abstract
: LNA-i-miR-221 is a novel phosphorothioate backbone 13-mer locked nucleic acid oligonucleotide-targeting microRNA-221 designed for the treatment of human malignancies. To understand the pharmacokinetic properties of this new agent, including unbound/total clearance, we investigated the LNA-i-miR-221 protein binding in three different species, including rat (Sprague-Dawley), monkey (Cynomolgus), and human. To this end, we generated a suitable ultrafiltration method to study the binding of LNA-i-miR-221 to plasma proteins. We identified that the fraction of LNA-i-miR-221 (at concentration of 1 and 10 µM) bound to rat, monkey, and human plasma proteins was high and ranged from 98.2 to 99.05%. This high protein binding of LNA-i-miR-221 to plasma proteins in all the species tested translates into a pharmacokinetic advantage by preventing rapid renal clearance. The integration of these results into multiple allometric interspecies scaling methods was then used to draw inferences about LNA-i-miR-221 pharmacokinetics in humans, thereby providing a framework for definition of safe starting and escalation doses and moving towards a first human clinical trial of LNA-i-miR-221.Entities:
Keywords: LNA-i-miR-221; PK; allometric method; first-in-human; locked nucleic acid; oligonucleotide; pharmacokinetic; phosphorothioate; plasma protein binding
Year: 2019 PMID: 31861748 PMCID: PMC7017297 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters measured in preclinical species after i.v. bolus administration of a novel phosphorothioate backbone 13-mer locked nucleic acid oligonucleotide-targeting miRNA-221 (LNA-i-miR-221).
| Species | Dose | C0/Dose | AUC 1 | AUC/Dose | CL | Terminal | Vd Terminal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg | ng/mL/mg | (h·ng/mL) | (h·ng/mL)/mg | mL/min/kg | h | mL/Kg | |
| Rat | 12.5 | 4462 | 27192 | 2160 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 2626 |
| Mouse 2 | 25 | 82 | 3226 | 129 | 129 | 1.5 | 16443 |
| Monkey | 8.75 | 7017 | 49300 | 5634 | 3.0 | 12.8 | 3286 |
1 for mouse and rat AUC was the corresponding AUC0–∞ after a single dose; for monkey, the AUC value corresponds to AUC0–48 h after single dose. 2 mouse PK parameters here reported should be considered only as indicative.
Figure 1plasma concentration versus time profiles (sparse sampling) following single intravenous (bolus) administration at 12.5 mg/kg to male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (semi logarithmic scale). Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3).
Figure 2plasma concentration versus time profiles following single intravenous (bolus) administration at 8.75 mg/kg to male Cynomolgus Monkey (semi logarithmic scale).
Figure 3plasma concentration versus time profiles (sparse sampling) following single intravenous (bolus) administration at 25 mg/kg to NOD.SCID mice (semi logarithmic scale). Plasma concentrations at 12h and 24h were below the limit of quantification (LLQ = 25ng/mL). Mouse PK was not used for the allometric extrapolation (see main text for details).
Average body weights (kg) used for allometric scaling.
| Species | Average Body Weights (kg) Used for Allometric Scaling |
|---|---|
| Mouse | 0.025 |
| Rat | 0.25 |
| Monkey (Cynomolgus) | 3.75 |
| Human | 70 |
The values have not been adjusted for the real animal weights.
Two-species direct allometric scaling, based on rat and monkey total clearance.
| b | −0.362198 |
| a | 0.6789 |
| CLhuman (mL/min/kg) | 1.02 |
| CLhuman (mL/min) | 71.7 |
Two-species allometric scaling according to Equation (3) (Tang method, 2007), based on rat and monkey total clearance.
| b | 0.65 |
| arat–monkey | 0.6789 |
| CLhuman (mL/min/kg) | 1.1 |
| CLhuman (mL/min) | 76 |
One-species allometric scaling according to Equation (4).
| Species Used for Scaling | Human CLp (mL/min/kg) | Human CLp (mL/min) |
|---|---|---|
| Single Species Allometry | ||
| rat | 1.9 | 135 |
| monkey | 1.4 | 100 |
Predicted LNA-i-miR-221 human PK parameters based on total CLp using different allometric approaches.
| Total Plasma Clearance | AUC/Dose | AUC for 0.78 ‡ mg/kg i.v. Dose | AUC for 1.82 ‡ mg/kg i.v. Dose | AUC for 5.0 ‡ mg/kg i.v. Dose | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allometric Method Used for Prediction | mL/min/kg | h·ng/mL·(mg Dose)−1 | h·ng/mL | h·ng/mL | h·ng/mL |
| Direct scaling two-species (r, mk) (Equation (1a)) | 1.0 | 16,264 | 12,686 | 29,600 | 81,318 |
| Tang et al. method two-species (r, mk) (Equation (3)) | 1.1 | 15,443 | 12,046 | 28,106 | 77,215 |
| One-species (r) allometric scaling (Equation (4)) | 1.9 | 8643 | 6741 | 15,730 | 43,214 |
| One-species (mk) allometric scaling (Equation (4)) | 1.4 | 11,711 | 9135 | 21,315 | 58,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
‡ HED predicted according to Equation (2).
Predicted LNA-i-miR-221 human PK parameters based on unbound CLpu using different allometric approaches.
| Total Plasma Clearance | AUC/Dose | AUC for 0.78 ‡ mg/kg i.v. Dose | AUC for 1.82 ‡ mg/kg i.v. Dose | AUC for 5.0 ‡ mg/kg i.v. Dose | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allometric Method Used for Prediction | mL/min/kg | h·ng/mL·(mg Dose)−1 | h·ng/mL | h·ng/mL | h·ng/mL |
| Direct scaling two-species (r, mk) (Equation (1a)) | 1.0 | 16,386 | 12781 | 29,823 | 81,931 |
| Tang et al. method two-species (r, mk) (Equation (3)) | 1.15 | 14,462 | 11280 | 26,320 | 72,309 |
| One-species (r) allometric scaling (Equation (4)) | 2.2 | 7749 | 6044 | 14,103 | 38,743 |
| One-species (mk) allometric scaling (Equation (4)) | 1.5 | 11,106 | 8662 | 20,212 | 55,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M = mouse, r = rat, mk = monkey; ‡ HED predicted according to Equation (2); human PAD predicted according to Equation (5); assuming hum NOAEL = rat NOAEL.
Protein binding values for the test item in human, monkey and rat plasma. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Unbound fraction (fu) values (averages of the two tested concentrations) used for the unbound clearance estimation.
| Species | LNA-i-miR-221 Concentration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 µM | 10 µM | Mean PPB | Mean fu | |
| Human | 98.6 ± 0.32 | 98.5 ± 0.09 | 98.55 | 0.0145 |
| Monkey | 98.2 ± 0.39 | 99.05 ± 0.39 | 98.63 | 0.0138 |
| Rat | 98.5 ± 0.17 | 98.9 ± 0.17 | 98.70 | 0.0130 |
PPB = plasma protein binding; mean fu = (100 − mean PPB%)/100.
Blank plasma used in the study.
| Species | Sex | Supplier | Anticoagulant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rat a | Male | Citoxlab | K2EDTA |
| Monkey b | Male | Citoxlab | K2EDTA |
| Human c | Male | Biopredic (PLA152A050) | K2EDTA |
a. (animal age: range 9–12 weeks, median 10 weeks) (animals’ body weight not recorded); b. the animals were 33 to 58 months old (median 44 months) and they had a mean body weight of 4.1 kg (range: 3.2 kg to 4.8 kg); c. (all Caucasians, aged 32–64 years, median 48 years).
Rats’ individual PK parameters and the relative statistics.
| Sex | λ | t1/2 | C0 | AUC0–∞ | AUC0–∞/Dose | AUC Extrapolated | Vz | Cl | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/h | h | ng/mL | h·ng/mL | % | mL/kg | mL/min/kg | |||
|
| 0.174 | 3.99 | 43,094 | 23,980 | 1918 | 0.869 | 3000 | 8.7 | |
| 0.187 | 3.70 | 47,033 | 24,961 | 1997 | 0.603 | 2672 | 8.3 | ||
| 0.187 | 3.70 | 64,272 | 31,455 | 2516 | 0.561 | 2120 | 6.6 | ||
|
| 0.183 | 3.80 | 51,467 | 26,799 | 2144 | 0.678 | 2597 | 7.9 | |
|
| 0.008 | 0.168 | 11,264 | 4062 | 325 | 0.167 | 445 | 1.1 | |
|
| 4 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 15 | 25 | 17 | 0.2 | |
|
| 0.178 | 3.90 | 49,251 | 24,364 | 1949 | 0.724 | 2890 | 8.6 | |
| 0.184 | 3.76 | 86,432 | 34,091 | 2727 | 0.490 | 1990 | 6.1 | ||
| 0.175 | 3.95 | 44,593 | 23,120 | 1850 | 0.792 | 3083 | 9.0 | ||
|
| 0.179 | 3.87 | 60,092 | 27,192 | 2175 | 0.669 | 2654 | 7.9 | |
|
| 0.005 | 0.099 | 22,930 | 6008 | 481 | 0.158 | 583 | 1.6 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 38 | 22 | 22 | 24 | 22 | 0.3 | |
|
|
| 0.181 | 3.83 | 55,779 | 26,995 | 2160 | 0.673 | 2626 | 7.9 |
|
| 0.006 | 0.131 | 16,834 | 4592 | 367 | 0.145 | 465 | 1.2 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 30 | 17 | 17 | 22 | 18 | 0.0 |
Figure 4Schematic representation of the methodological approaches and results discussed in the work. Arrows connect the input information used to estimate the corresponding output parameter; references to the applied methods are also cited. Based on the estimated parameters, a short conclusion is reported. Additional details are described in the main text.