| Literature DB >> 31861423 |
César Leyva-Porras1, Pedro Cruz-Alcantar2, Vicente Espinosa-Solís3, Eduardo Martínez-Guerra4, Claudia I Piñón- Balderrama2,4, Isaac Compean Martínez2, María Z Saavedra-Leos2,4.
Abstract
Phase transition issues in the field of foods and drugs have significantly influenced these industries and consequently attracted the attention of scientists and engineers. The study of thermodynamic parameters such as the glass transition temperature (Tg), melting temperature (Tm), crystallization temperature (Tc), enthalpy (H), and heat capacity (Cp) may provide important information that can be used in the development of new products and improvement of those already in the market. The techniques most commonly employed for characterizing phase transitions are thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), thermomechanical analysis (TMA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Among these techniques, DSC is preferred because it allows the detection of transitions in a wide range of temperatures (-90 to 550 °C) and ease in the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the transitions. However, the standard DSC still presents some limitations that may reduce the accuracy and precision of measurements. The modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) has overcome some of these issues by employing sinusoidally modulated heating rates, which are used to determine the heat capacity. Another variant of the MDSC is the supercooling MDSC (SMDSC). SMDSC allows the detection of more complex thermal events such as solid-solid (Ts-s) transitions, liquid-liquid (Tl-l) transitions, and vitrification and devitrification temperatures (Tv and Tdv, respectively), which are typically found at the supercooling temperatures (Tco). The main advantage of MDSC relies on the accurate detection of complex transitions and the possibility of distinguishing reversible events (dependent on the heat capacity) from non-reversible events (dependent on kinetics).Entities:
Keywords: modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC); phase transitions; thermal analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31861423 PMCID: PMC7023573 DOI: 10.3390/polym12010005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic representation of first and second-order transitions. (a) Melting transition of a crystalline solid. (b) Glass transition of an amorphous solid.
Figure 2Schematic representation of thermal transitions in semicrystalline material obtained from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermogram [22].
Figure 3Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)-DSC thermogram of inulin obtained from Dalia at water activity aw = 0.071 and a heating ramp of 5 °C/min [22].
Figure 4Typical DMA thermogram showing the evolution of E’, E”, and tan δ as a function of the temperature [11].
Figure 5Thermal mechanical compression test (TMA) to determine transition temperature. The glass transition temperature (Tg) is considered as the temperature where a sudden dimensional change occurs [11].
Figure 6(a) Modulated DSC (MDSC) thermogram of the total heat flow of Inulin. (b) MDSC heat flow thermogram separated in two components: reversible and non-reversible events used for the identification of different transition temperatures of Inulin such as Tg, Tc, Tm, and Td [22].
Figure 7Supercooling MDSC (SMDSC) thermograms of ethylene glycol at 278 K/min: (a) DSC, (b) MDSC, and (c) SMDSC [21].
Figure 8Tg of sucrose obtained from conventional DSC at heating ramps of 1, 10, and 25 °C/min and obtained from MDSC at heating ramps of 120, 132 and 138 °C/min [49].