Literature DB >> 31860896

Surface and near-surface dose measurements at beam entry and exit in a 1.5 T MR-Linac using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.

Anthony Kim1, Stephanie Lim-Reinders, Syed Bilal Ahmad, Arjun Sahgal, Brian M Keller.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to measure surface and near-surface dose at entry and exit surfaces in a 1.5 T MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs). OSLDs were expected to be useful for measuring surface dose in a strong magnetic field because they can be taped to undersides to measure exit dose, and their dose response have been shown to be reasonably insensitive to variations in beam angle, beam energy, and magnetic fields. The surface and near-surface dose at the entry and exit of a 20 cm thick solid water phantom was measured with OSLDs for 5  ×  5, 10  ×  10, and 22  ×  22 cm2 field sizes. The solid water phantom was elevated off the couch top to produce an air gap of 3.7 cm so as to observe the electron return effect (ERE) near the beam exit surface. Measurement depths ranged from surface to 15 mm deep from entry and exit surfaces. The phantom dose distribution was also computed in the Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) Monte Carlo treatment planning system (TPS). For the 5  ×  5, 10  ×  10, and 22  ×  22 cm2 field sizes the surface dose at depth 0 mm was extrapolated from OSLD measurements to be 10.9%, 12.0%, and 13.5%. The surface entry dose was found to be far less field size-dependent compared to a conventional linac, likely due to a lack of electronic contamination due to the strong magnetic field perpendicular to the beam. The ERE effect was observed in the measurements near the exit surface of the phantom, and was in close agreement with the TPS calculation.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31860896     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab64b6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  2 in total

1.  Dosimetric evaluation of irradiation geometry and potential air gaps in an acrylic miniphantom used for external audit of absolute dose calibration for a hybrid 1.5 T MR-linac system.

Authors:  Neelam Tyagi; Ergys Subashi; Dale Michael Lovelock; Stephen Kry; Paola Elisa Alvarez; Margie A Hunt; Seng Boh Lim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Comparison of Prospectively Generated Glioma Treatment Plans Clinically Delivered on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Linear Accelerator (MR-Linac) Versus Conventional Linac: Predicted and Measured Skin Dose.

Authors:  Michael H Wang; Anthony Kim; Mark Ruschin; Hendrick Tan; Hany Soliman; Sten Myrehaug; Jay Detsky; Zain Husain; Eshetu G Atenafu; Brian Keller; Arjun Sahgal; Chia-Lin Tseng
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.