Chukwudi A Nnaji1, Muki S Shey2, Olatunji O Adetokunboh3, Charles S Wiysonge4. 1. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: nnjchu001@myuct.ac.za. 2. Department of Medicine & Wellcome Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa (CIDRI-Africa), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. 4. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent upsurges in yellow fever outbreaks are increasing the demand for yellow fever vaccine, while enormously straining global vaccine supply. Fractional dose yellow fever vaccination is being considered as a dose-sparing strategy to address current vaccine shortages. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination, in comparison with those of standard dose vaccination. METHODS: We registered this review on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42018084214), developed the protocol in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) and synthesised the evidence in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We stratified meta-analyses by vaccine dose. RESULTS: We retrieved 2524 records from the literature search, eleven of them potentially eligible. From these studies, we included eight eligible trials, with a total of 2371 participants. Seroconversion rates at four to five weeks following vaccination were similar between participants who received standard doses and participants who received fractional doses containing one-third (547 participants: risk ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.04), one-fifth (155 participants: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.03), one-tenth (890 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.01), and one-fiftieth (661 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92-1.02) of the standard dose. However, the rates of seroconversion were substantially lower among participants who received fractional doses containing one-hundredth and lower fractions of the standard dose. Immunogenicity similarly persisted 8-10 years following both fractional and standard dose vaccination. Minor adverse events following vaccination did not differ across doses, and no serious adverse events were reported in any study arm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of fractional dosing as a strategy for mitigating vaccine shortages. The strategy should be specifically considered for individuals who are young, immuno-competent and well nourished.
BACKGROUND: Recent upsurges in yellow fever outbreaks are increasing the demand for yellow fever vaccine, while enormously straining global vaccine supply. Fractional dose yellow fever vaccination is being considered as a dose-sparing strategy to address current vaccine shortages. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination, in comparison with those of standard dose vaccination. METHODS: We registered this review on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42018084214), developed the protocol in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) and synthesised the evidence in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We stratified meta-analyses by vaccine dose. RESULTS: We retrieved 2524 records from the literature search, eleven of them potentially eligible. From these studies, we included eight eligible trials, with a total of 2371 participants. Seroconversion rates at four to five weeks following vaccination were similar between participants who received standard doses and participants who received fractional doses containing one-third (547 participants: risk ratio [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.04), one-fifth (155 participants: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.03), one-tenth (890 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.01), and one-fiftieth (661 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92-1.02) of the standard dose. However, the rates of seroconversion were substantially lower among participants who received fractional doses containing one-hundredth and lower fractions of the standard dose. Immunogenicity similarly persisted 8-10 years following both fractional and standard dose vaccination. Minor adverse events following vaccination did not differ across doses, and no serious adverse events were reported in any study arm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of fractional dosing as a strategy for mitigating vaccine shortages. The strategy should be specifically considered for individuals who are young, immuno-competent and well nourished.