Literature DB >> 31859073

Synthetic tracheal grafts seeded with bone marrow cells fail to generate functional tracheae: First long-term follow-up study.

Thomas Fux1, Cecilia Österholm2, Raquel Themudo3, Oscar Simonson4, Karl-Henrik Grinnemo5, Matthias Corbascio6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Synthetic tracheal grafts seeded with autologous bone marrow-mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) have been described as becoming living and functional grafts representing a promising option for tracheal replacement for pathologies unamenable by segmental resection or autologous repair. This study aimed to present the first long-term follow-up of these procedures in humans.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3 patients who received synthetic tracheal grafts seeded with BM-MNCs implanted.
RESULTS: Patient 1 was a 37-year-old man with mucoepidermoid carcinoma, the first-ever human to receive a synthetic tracheal graft seeded with BM-MNCs. Patient 2 was a 30-year-old man with adenoid cystic carcinoma, and patient 3 was a 22-year-old woman with an iatrogenic tracheal injury. All patients developed graft-related complications necessitating multiple surgical reinterventions. Patient 1 was hospitalized for 8 months before dying from respiratory failure secondary to graft dehiscence 32 months after implantation. Patient 2 died 3.5 months after implantation from undisclosed causes. Patient 3 received a second synthetic tracheal graft after 11 months and an allogeneic trachea and lung transplantation 45 months after the primary implantation. Patient 3 underwent 191 surgical interventions after the primary implantation and spent 55 months in the intensive care unit before dying from airway bleeding. All patients' bronchoscopic, histologic, and radiologic investigations demonstrated graft-associated complications, including anastomotic fistulae and obstructive granulation tissue, without graft vascularization, mucosal lining, or integration into adjacent tissues.
CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic tracheal grafts seeded with BM-MNCs do not become living functional tracheal grafts and lead to debilitating complications and death.
Copyright © 2019 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  airway surgery; synthetic tracheal graft; tracheal prosthesis; tracheal replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31859073     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Growing Medical Need for Tracheal Replacement: Reconstructive Strategies Should Overcome Their Limits.

Authors:  Davide Adamo; Giulia Galaverni; Vincenzo Giuseppe Genna; Filippo Lococo; Graziella Pellegrini
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  A year in general thoracic surgery published in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery: 2020.

Authors:  Michael Lanuti; Jules Lin; Thomas Ng; Bryan M Burt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Re: Tracheal Allotransplantation-Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Pawan Agarwal; Dhananjaya Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-11-30

4.  Commentary: Great toenail grafts for tracheal reconstruction: Adopt it or kick it to the curb-your choice.

Authors:  Robert B Cameron
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-11-10

5.  Tracheal reconstruction with nail grafts: A novel approach.

Authors:  Hui-Fu Huang; Juey-Jen Hwang; Pei-Ming Huang
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-19

6.  Commentary: The search for a breakthrough in tracheal replacement surgery: The good, the bad, and the downright ugly.

Authors:  Robert B Cameron
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.