| Literature DB >> 31858936 |
Abstract
Advance directives entail a refusal expressed by a still-healthy patient. Three consequences stem from that fact: (a) advance refusal is unspecific, since it is impossible to predict what the patient's conditions and the risk-benefit ratio may be in the foreseeable future; (b) those decisions cannot be as well informed as those formulated while the disease is in progress; (c) while both current consent and refusal can be revoked as the disease unfolds, until the treatment starts out, advance directives become effective when the patient becomes incapable or unconscious; such decisions can therefore not be revoked at any stage of the disease. Therefore, advance directives are binding for doctors only at the stage of advance treatment planning, i.e., only if they refer to an illness already in progress.Entities:
Keywords: advance care planning; advance directives; binding value; conscientious objection; self-determination
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31858936 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180119000823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Camb Q Healthc Ethics ISSN: 0963-1801 Impact factor: 1.284