| Literature DB >> 31858365 |
Hassan Abolhassani1,2, Yasser M El-Sherbiny3,4,5, Gururaj Arumugakani6, Clive Carter6, Stephen Richards7, Dylan Lawless8, Philip Wood6, Matthew Buckland9, Marzieh Heydarzadeh10, Asghar Aghamohammadi2, Sophie Hambleton11, Lennart Hammarström1, Siobhan O Burns9, Rainer Doffinger12, Sinisa Savic13,14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inducible T cell co-stimulator (ICOS) deficiency has been categorized as a combined immunodeficiency often complicated by enteropathies, autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation, and malignancy. We report seven new patients and four novel ICOS mutations resulting in a common variable immunodeficiency (CVID)-like phenotype and show that dysregulated IL-12 release, reduced cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) expression, and skewing towards a Th1-dominant phenotype are all associated with inflammatory complications in this condition.Entities:
Keywords: ICOS deficiency; Primary immunodeficiency; antibody deficiency; chronic diarrhea; granulomatous inflammation; ustekinumab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31858365 PMCID: PMC7082411 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-019-00735-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Immunol ISSN: 0271-9142 Impact factor: 8.317
Fig. 1ICOS variants diagnosed in combined immunodeficiency. a Schematic view of the ICOS exons and domains representing the rate of missense and loss of function mutation among a normal population (extracted from genomAD), variants diagnosed in patients with ICOS deficiency. b Black and red mutations marks refer to previously reported and newly identified mutations, respectively. c Multiple sequence alignments representing conservation within positions of newly observed missense mutations (p.F119S and p.V151L) in the ICOS protein. d 3D structure of ICOS protein representing the location of the missense mutations in helical domain of the protein
Main clinical and immunological features of ICOS deficiency
| Patients | Total | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | P14 | P15 | P16 | P17 | P18 | P19 | P20 | P21 | P22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory features | 17 (77.2) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
| Bronchiectasis | 3 (13.6) | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||||||
| Severe viral infections | 11 (50) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||
| Opportunistic infections | 5 (22.7) | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||||
| Autoimmunity | 7 (31.8) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||||
| Enteropathies | 13 (59.0) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||
| Lymphoproliferation | 9 (40.9) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
| Malignancy | 2 (9.0) | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Deceased | 4 (18.1) | + | +* | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| Hypogammaglobulinemia | 22 (100) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | +** | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Normal IgG3 | 5 (29.4) | + | + | + | + | + | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | + | |||||||||||
| Low IgM | 12 (54.5) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
| Normal IgM | 5 (22.7) | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||||
| Normal IgA | 5 (22.7) | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||||||
| Specific antibody deficiency | 16 (88.8) | + | + | + | + | NR | NR | NR | + | + | + | + | NR | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| Anemia | 6 (28.5) | + | + | + | + | + | NR | + | |||||||||||||||
| Thrombocytopenia | 7 (33.3) | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | + | ||||||||||||||
| Leukopenia | 4 (19.0) | + | + | + | NR | + | |||||||||||||||||
| Neutropenia | 2 (9.5) | + | + | NR | + | ||||||||||||||||||
| Lymphopenia | 5 (23.8) | + | + | + | + | + | NR | +# | |||||||||||||||
| T cell lymphopenia | 5 (23.8) | + | + | + | + | NR | |||||||||||||||||
| CD4+ T cell lymphopenia | 7 (33.3) | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | |||||||||||||||
| CD8+ T cell lymphopenia | 8 (38.0) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | ||||||||||||||
| B cell lymphopenia | 12 (60.0) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | + | |||||||||
| NK lymphopenia | 8 (38.0) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | + | + | ||||||||||||
| Increased naïve B cells | 15 (93.7) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | NR | + | NR | + | + | + | NR | NR | + | + | + | |
| Reduced non-SM B cells | 16 (88.8) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | + | + | + | NR | NR | + | + | + | ||
| Reduced SM B cells | 17 (100) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | + | + | + | NR | NR | NR | + | + | + |
| Increased naïve CD4+ T cells | 5 (33.3) | + | + | + | + | + | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||||||
| Reduced effector CD4+ T cells | 5 (38.4) | + | + | + | + | + | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||||
| Reduced follicular CD4+ T cells | 11 (100) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | NR | NR | NR | + | NR | + | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
*Due to non-immunodeficiency related condition
**Mild transient hypogammaglobulinemia and specific antibody deficiency
#Developed later not present at the diagnosis
NR, not reported; SM, switched memory
Fig. 2a Kaplan-Meier survival rate for ICOS deficiency. b Clinical features of ICOS deficiency
Fig. 3Cytokine production after whole blood stimulation: healthy controls (C gray circles, n = 59) and patients (P16, red circles; P17, red triangles; P18, red squares; P20, red diamonds). Statistical analysis was done with two-tailed Mann-Whitney tests using the GraphPad Prism software V8.02
Fig. 4ICOSL expression on monocytes and Th1 and Th2 ratios. a. Time line changes (0–120 h) ICOSL level fold change on monocytes in patients (n = 4) determined by flow cytometry compared with health controls (n = 3) following LPS stimulation. b Mean with SD of the ratio of Th1/Th2 cells within the memory T cell population (CD45RA Neg CD4 T cells) of ICOS deficiency (n = 3), ICOS sufficient primary antibody deficiency (n = 6), and healthy controls (n = 7). Th1 cells were gated as CD183+CD196− helper memory T cells and Th2 cells were gated as CD183−CD196− helper memory T cells. Unpaired t test and p values provided. The detailed gating strategy is provided in Fig. E4.
Fig. 5CTLA expression on a Tregs and b CD4+ T effector cells. PBMC were isolated from healthy control (HC) and patients (P16 and P17). Cells were stained both prior to culture (fresh), and following culturing in 96-well plates in triplicate in the presence of PHA (Sigma, 2.5 μg/ml) for 48 h at 37 °C. Surface and intracellular levels of CTLA4 were assessed on both Tregs and effector T cell populations. The figure represents the average of 3 separate experiments. S, surface expression; I, intracellular expression. Statistical analysis was done with unpaired t test and p values provided tests using the GraphPad Prism software V8.02