Literature DB >> 31858255

Team performance during postsurgical patient handovers in paediatric care.

Matthias Weigl1, Maria Heinrich2, Julia Keil3, Julius Z Wermelt4, Florian Bergmann5, Jochen Hubertus5, Florian Hoffmann3.   

Abstract

Postsurgical handover of paediatric patients from operating rooms to intensive care units is a critical moment. This process is susceptible to errors and inefficiencies particularly if poor teamwork in this multidisciplinary and ad hoc collaboration occurs. Through combining provider- and observer-rated team performance, we aimed to determine agreement levels on team performance and associations with mental demands, disruptions, and stress. An observational and multisource study of provider and concomitant expert-observer ratings was established. In an Academic Paediatric Hospital, we conducted standardized observations of postsurgical handovers to PICU. We applied established observational and self-reported teamwork tools. Nested fixed and mixed models were established to estimate agreement within teams, between providers' and observer's ratings, as well as for estimations between team performance and mental demands, disruptions, and stress outcomes. Thirty-one postsurgical patient handovers were included with overall 109 ratings of involved providers. Provider-perceived team performance was rated high. Within the receiving sub-team, situation awareness was perceived lower compared to the handoff sub-team [F(df = 1) = 4.41, p = .04]. Inter-provider agreement on handover team performance was low for the overall team yet higher within handover sub-teams. We observed that high level of distractions during the handover was associated with inferior team performance rated by observers (B = - 0.72, 95% CI = - 1.44, - 0.01).
Conclusion: We observed substantial disagreements on how involved professionals as well as observers rated teamwork during patient transfers. Investigations into paediatric teamwork and particular team-based handovers should carefully consider if concurrent provider and observer assessments are a valid and reliable way to evaluate teamwork in paediatric care. Common handover language should be established and mandatory before jointly evaluating this process. Our findings advocate also that handovers should be performed under low levels of distractions.What is Known:• Efficient teamwork during transfers of critically ill children is fundamental to quality and safety of handover practice.• Postoperative handovers are often performed by ad hoc teams of caregivers with multiple backgrounds and are prone to suboptimal team performance, communication, and information transfer.What is New:• Our provider and expert evaluations of team performance during OR-PICU handovers showed poor agreement for team performance. Our findings challenge previous results drawing upon single source assessments and inform future studies to carefully consider what approach of team performance assessments is required.• We further demonstrate that high levels of disruptions are associated with poor team performance during patient handovers and that efforts to ensure undisrupted handover practices in clinical care are necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensive care unit; Operating room; Paediatric care; Patient handover; Stress; Teamwork

Year:  2019        PMID: 31858255     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03547-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  32 in total

1.  Can we talk? The art (and science) of handoff conversation.

Authors:  Julie K Johnson; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Factors compromising safety in surgery: stressful events in the operating room.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Louise Hull; Nick Sevdalis; Tanya Tierney; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Effective handover communication: an overview of research and improvement efforts.

Authors:  Tanja Manser; Simon Foster
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-06

4.  Evaluation of postoperative handover using a tool to assess information transfer and teamwork.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; May Abboudi; Lukas Fischler; Tanja Schmidt; Amit Vats; Chhavi Manchanda; Nick Sevdalis; Daniel Scheidegger; Charles Vincent; Krishna Moorthy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; David M Neyens; James Abernathy; David Allison; Anjali Joseph; Scott T Reeves
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Associations of Intraoperative Flow Disruptions and Operating Room Teamwork During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias Weigl; Jeannette Weber; Elyse Hallett; Michael Pfandler; Boris Schlenker; Armin Becker; Ken Catchpole
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Clinical handover incident reporting in one UK general hospital.

Authors:  Cinzia Pezzolesi; Fabrizio Schifano; John Pickles; William Randell; Zakar Hussain; Helen Muir; Soraya Dhillon
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Clinician perceptions of operating room to intensive care unit handoffs and implications for patient safety: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lisa M McElroy; Kathryn R Macapagal; Kelly M Collins; Michael M Abecassis; Jane L Holl; Daniela P Ladner; Elisa J Gordon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Patient handover from surgery to intensive care: using Formula 1 pit-stop and aviation models to improve safety and quality.

Authors:  Ken R Catchpole; Marc R de Leval; Angus McEwan; Nick Pigott; Martin J Elliott; Annette McQuillan; Carol MacDonald; Allan J Goldman
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 10.  Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lee Ann Riesenberg; Jessica Leitzsch; Jaime L Massucci; Joseph Jaeger; Joel C Rosenfeld; Carl Patow; Jamie S Padmore; Kelly P Karpovich
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A narrative review of modern approach and outcomes evaluation in congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Antonio F Corno; Damien J LaPar; Wen Li; Jorge D Salazar
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-08

2.  Evaluation of a Paper-Based Checklist versus an Electronic Handover Tool Based on the Situation Background Assessment Recommendation (SBAR) Concept in Patients after Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Carolin Rehm; Richard Zoller; Alina Schenk; Nicole Müller; Nadine Strassberger-Nerschbach; Sven Zenker; Ehrenfried Schindler
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.