Literature DB >> 31858136

Effectiveness of Shorter Versus Longer Durations of Therapy for Common Inpatient Infections Associated With Bacteremia: A Multicenter, Propensity-Weighted Cohort Study.

Leila S Hojat1,2,3, Mary T Bessesen1,2,4,5, Misha Huang1,2,6,7,8, Margaret Reid9, Bryan C Knepper10, Matthew A Miller11,12, Katherine C Shihadeh10,13,14,15, Randolph V Fugit4,5,16, Timothy C Jenkins1,2,10,13,14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National guidelines for pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infection (UTI), and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) do not address treatment duration for infections associated with bacteremia. We evaluated clinical outcomes of patients receiving shorter (5-9 days) versus longer (10-15 days) duration of antibiotics.
METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of inpatients with uncomplicated PNA, UTI, or ABSSSI and associated bacteremia. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rehospitalization, reinitiation of antibiotics, or all-cause mortality within 30 days of antibiotic completion. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, Clostridioides difficile infection, and antibiotic-related adverse effects necessitating change in therapy. A propensity score-weighted logistic regression model was used to mitigate potential bias associated with nonrandom assignment of treatment duration.
RESULTS: Of 408 patients included, 123 received a shorter treatment duration (median 8 days) and 285 received a longer duration (median 13 days). In the propensity-weighted analysis, the probability of the primary outcome was 13.5% in the shorter group and 11.1% in the longer group (average treatment effect, 2.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], .65-2.40; P = .505). However, shorter courses were associated with higher probability of restarting antibiotics (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.61; P = .046) and C. difficile infection (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.21-7.59; P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Shorter courses of antibiotic treatment for PNA, UTI, and ABSSSI with bacteremia were not associated with increased overall risk of clinical failure; however, prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the effectiveness of shorter treatment durations.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection; antimicrobial stewardship; bacteremia; pneumonia; urinary tract infection

Year:  2020        PMID: 31858136     DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz1197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  2 in total

1.  Optimizing the Management of Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections: Consensus Guidance Using a Modified Delphi Process.

Authors:  Emily L Heil; Jacqueline T Bork; Lilian M Abbo; Tamar F Barlam; Sara E Cosgrove; Angelina Davis; David R Ha; Timothy C Jenkins; Keith S Kaye; James S Lewis; Jessica K Ortwine; Jason M Pogue; Emily S Spivak; Michael P Stevens; Liza Vaezi; Pranita D Tamma
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.835

2.  Survey of infectious diseases providers reveals variability in duration of antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Gram-negative bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Joshua T Thaden; Pranita D Tamma; Qing Pan; Yohei Doi; Nick Daneman
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.